Broteem, that is precisely what this is about: Intelligence error. If you have made your own interpretation about some sort of conspiracy theory, please don't blame others for 'creating' fictions. The article in no way suggests that the attacks were deliberately allowed to take place but that there were information available prior to it - much like the same way U.S. intelligence had information about 9/11 but still could not prevent it. There are just too many information all the time about these things and unfortunatelly authorities find it hard to deal with all of them. Don't forget that it was an Indian police officer who spoke about the Indian national involved in the plot and not me who created it. Authorities make mistakes all the time, intelligence services more often than not work effectively, but that doesn't mean they are conspiring to destroy their own country. So, please, don't go around making accusations. Peace

It is Olmert's concern, and not mine, that Iran might acquire nuclear weapons while the US fails to prevent it. He spoke about it to George Bush in their last meeting. As for Obama's approach, many in the Israeli political arena see it as soft due to the fact that he is willing to talk to Iran without pre-conditions and because he prefers a diplomatic solution (something the Israelis are skeptical about, as they would likely remain suspicious unless the regime of the Ayatollahs collapsed) over a military one, though he has not ruled out the latter.