Federal Court Ruled Against BCBS Overpayment Recoupment Practice - Free Webinars on Its Impact for Entire Healthcare Industry
Linkedin

Federal Court Ruled Against BCBS Overpayment Recoupment Practice - Free Webinars on Its Impact for Entire Healthcare Industry

Hanover Park : IL : USA | Nov 01, 2010 at 1:10 AM PDT
Source: PRWeb
XX XX
Views: Pending
 

Blue Cross stated its conclusion that the miscoding was an "intentional misrepresentation and demanded repayment of $412,952.93. Rhode Island, among other things, alleging: Count I alleges that Defendants breached their Provider Agreements, by submitting claims for unauthorized services, and, in the case of Defendant Korsen, by terminating the Provider Agreement without proper notice to Blue Cross. Count II is for fraud based on false and fraudulent claims submitted by Defendants for compensation...Based on the allegations in the Amended Complaint, it appears that Blue Cross defines permissible, compensable medical services; it determines which services are medically necessary for its subscribers; and it audits medical providers to determine if their services are medically necessary and generally accepted in the medical community.

 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Advertisement
 

More From Allvoices

 
Tap_logo_330_110_event
 


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2013. All rights reserved.