Los Alamos Fire Just Gets Worse Weapon Grade Plutonium on Site
Local to Global News
 
 Connect 
Sign up now!

Los Alamos Fire Just Gets Worse Weapon Grade Plutonium on Site

Los Alamos : NM : USA | Jun 29, 2011 at 11:19 AM PDT
10 1
Views: 842
 

How can those who should be protecting us be so stupid and negligent in their duties. The out of control fire at Los Alamos brings more and more bad news. The town of Los Alamos has been evacuated. Those people are relatively safe, but the big word is relatively. Massive amounts of plutonium and radioactive garbage stand to burn and spread their deadly poisons far and wide.

Weapons grade plutonium is stored at the site. It takes an infinitesimally small amount to kill a person if it is breathed in or ingested. Officials have assured the public that it is safe and that the fire won’t breach the containers. We have to take them at their word, don’t we?

There is also a huge stockpile of radioactive garbage vulnerable to the flames.

Los Alamos County fire Chief Doug Tucker, whose department is responsible for protecting the lab, said the barrels are stacked about three high inside tents on lab propertyCBC News



Again, we have been assured that the barrels of highly poisonous material, stored in tents, is in no danger of burning and releasing radioactive particles into the air that people are breathing. They have had to evacuate the town, it may burn, but the stuff stored in tents is perfectly safe.

This comes on the heels of the flooded nuclear power plants in Nebraska that are also perfectly safe. Followed yesterday be the news that the report for the safe storage of radioactive waste in Yucca Mountain had been fiddled with, much to the chagrin of scientists who worked on the report.

Fukushima Daiichi was perfectly safe we were told. So was Windscale, Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and numerous other installations. It’s estimated that over the past 20 years over 50 000 people have died early from the disaster at Chernobyl, how many more will die if the plutonium gets vaporized?

BMcPherson is based in Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada, and is an Anchor for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Posted By catspirit catspirit | 11 months ago
Great report!!!!!!!!!! It seems all the major news sites have this story listed at the bottom! Why??????? This is possibly catastrophic news. I'm glad your post made it to the top.
Posted By robertweller Robert Weller | 11 months ago
Hey, did you know there are a couple of wars going on. oh yeah, a hotel got attacked last night.
Posted By ahol888 Adrian Holman | 11 months ago
You may think that authorities are being negligent, but man cannot control a wildfire.
Reply By BMcPherson BMcPherson | 11 months ago
That's absolutely true Adrian, no more than they can control a tsunami or a flood or an earthquake. Still, our leaders tell us that these radioactive poisons are perfectly safe where they are. What are they going to tell us when the fault line under the nuclear facility at Diablo Canyon ruptures?
Reply By ahol888 Adrian Holman | 11 months ago
Well, you won't have to worry about that scenario because the wildfire will cause the nuclear plant to explode on Independence Day weekend. There will be fireworks seen from the New Mexico plant.
Posted By StephEaly Stephanie Ealy | 11 months ago
SCARY! Thanks for the info Barbara!!! UP
Posted By dunite dunite | 11 months ago
i guess the government didn't want to create a frightful scenario requiring more tending than their present herculean task thanks^^^!
Posted By lynspace lynspace | 11 months ago
The mainstream media has the responsibility to drum up important news stories over the trivial ones. But who judges the trivial from the grand ones? The consumers and the public, which may not be interested in the media exposure but are themselves affected by the news.
Sensationalizing a story to cover a more delicate event is a crime.
Posted By RaulDeSouza RaulDeSouza | 11 months ago
I am sure the authorities are trying their best to prevent it. But it does take time and its really hard.
Posted By FauziaSultana FauziaSultana | 11 months ago
It is indeed alarming to know from your report that this matter is not being taken seriously as authorities claim the radio-active material is safe.it is hoped they are taking full responsibilty.Rated up.
Posted By brigidprimrose Brigid Jean Primrose | 11 months ago
Are the people in the know playing things down to avoid panic? Great report. Rated up.
Posted By northernlight Yoko Otake | 11 months ago
Where to put radioactive waste is actually a huge problem raised from nuclear plants. Low level, and/or high level radioactive wastes are needed long time monitoring; low one for 300 years and high one 100,000 years which have to be buried deep down, somewhere 500m under the surface. Whichever the level, they are quite dangerous for our health, attacking our DNAs; though your/our governments have been kept hiding the truth. People of Japan have become guinea pigs, human experimental materials, in Hiroshima, Nagasaki and now in Fukushima. So did many US soldiers, workers, people and even movie stars who were around nuclear facilities and/or nuclear bomb experiments sites. Do you know that women around nuclear power plants have twice higher risk of breast cancer?
Marie Curie died from leukemia in 1934 and 11 years later the first nuclear bombs dropped and 66 years later Fukushima... WE MUST MAKE THIS OVER!!!
Posted By solarp Surya Gaire | 11 months ago
Thank you very much for sharing this Interesting news.rated up!
Advertisement
 

News Stories

 
  • More crews fight Los Alamos blaze

    BBC
    More firefighters deploy in New Mexico Doug Tucker, Los Alamos fire chief: "We're doing our best to keep it off the lab" Hundreds more firefighters are being deployed to battle a wildfire near a top US nuclear weapons research lab in New Mexico amid...
  • Towns near NM fire, nuclear lab wary of smoke

    AP Online
    N.M. (AP) — Residents downwind of a wildfire that is threatening the nation's premier nuclear-weapons laboratory are worried about the potential of a radioactive smoke plume if the flames reach thousands of barrels of waste stored in above-ground...
  • Fire burning near Los Alamos 3 percent contained

    Denver Post
    N.M.A wildfire 12 miles southwest of Los Alamos is 3 percent contained after burning across nearly 61,000 acres or 95 square miles. Forest Service fire managers described the fire as active with short range spotting and short crown runs with fire...
  • Wildfire Moves Closer Toward N.M. Nuclear Lab

    Fox
    Flames from the Las Conchas fire burn in the hills above Los Alamos National Laboratory, a nuclear facility. N.M. -- A wildfire near the desert birthplace of the atomic bomb advanced on the Los Alamos laboratory and thousands of outdoor drums of...
  • Fire chief says Los Alamos lab is safe from wildfire

    CNN Blog
    The Los Alamos National Laboratory in the New Mexico town of the same name will be spared from a fire raging in the vicinity, the Los Alamos fire chief told CNN Wednesday. "We feel very comfortable that material is secure," Chief Doug Tucker said.
  • Fire chief: Wildfire will miss Los Alamos

    United Press International
    The 110-square-mile wildfire burning near New Mexico's Los Alamos National Laboratory will likely miss the lab and residents' homes, the town's fire chief said. A buffer created around the secretive U.S. military nuclear lab is holding up and is big...
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_103

Sitemap


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2012. All rights reserved.