
The majority of States in the Arab League backed the idea of a no fly zone, but the support was not unanimous. Syria and Algeria gave dissenting votes to the idea.
A report indicates that the Arab League supports the idea of a no fly zone, but rejects the idea of a full scale military intervention. The consent of the Arab League was one of the pieces in the puzzle that NATO needed to get full legal authorization, which also includes the African Union and a resolution by the United Nations.
While David Cameron of the UK and Nicola Sarkozy, France have pushed for the idea, they have been unable to garner support from the EU and NATO. France has also recognized the Lybia Interim Governing Council.
The vote and backing by the Arab League further isolates Muammed Gadaffi and should provide food for thought to those military leaders and members of his regime of the consequences of supporting him.
Despite the the latest developments, Gadaffi's forces have recaptured many of the areas taken by the Rebels, including the oil port of Ras Lanuf. Reports have also suggested that the Rebel front line has been pushed back towards the town of Uqaylah.
The Arab League has also said that it would meet with representatives of the new governing council.
The request for a no fly zone will now be presented to the UN. If a no fly zone were authorized it would permit the shooting down of any of Gadaffi's air assets. Presumably it would also require a neutralizing attack on his ground to air systems.
Russia has in the past expressed serious reservations on a no fly zone. It could use its veto to prevent the passing of a resolution.
Regardless how this goes in the UN, Gadaffi now has a clear message from the Arab States that they no longer consider him the legitimate leader of Libya. Whether he takes heed, remains to be seen.
Or add related content to this report
News Stories | Blogs | Images | Videos | Comments
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccludIOHySo
ciao
Oh and FYI - you are the one that sounds like a parrot - you say the same thing over and over without the conviction to reveal your own name, for all we know you are one of Gadaffi's fearmongers spreading dissent - how can we possibly give you an ounce of credibility? Stand up and be a man - or woman - tell us your name
John Donne tells us "No man is an island, entire of itself." Unless one is a meglomaniac.
Gaddafi is willing to confront with indignation his Arab brothers and sisters in his quest for power and maintaining his dictorship. He will stop at nothing less. What are the risks to the rest of the world, and more importantly to Libyan civilians, if we do nothing or if we venture into a military action, which the no fly zone really is.
Some might view the no fly zone initiation as an act of war against a soverign nation. I have vacillated about this myself the last few days because he is killing his own people, which perhaps should divest him of the protection of soverignty.
Gadaffi has long given up on the League and was supporting African unity. The no fly zone may not make much difference even if it does finally get done since Gadaffi's air power is very limited.
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/8455717-arab-league-voted-against-foreign-interventions-allows-no-fly-murders
Saudi Arabia does not allow free association of it's Citizens.
Let's face facts, A No Fly Zone over Libya means an invasion. The 'Mad Dog' was never going to be tamed. The 1988 Lockerbie Tragedy was his response for the Killing of his daughter in the American bombing campaign of 1986.
Any military intervention in Libya, directly or by proxy is untenable.
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/8455717-arab-league-voted-against-foreign-interventions-allows-no-fly-murders .