Most Americans Want to End U.S. Foreign Aid to Arab Nations
Local to Global News
 
 Connect 
Sign up now!

Most Americans Want to End U.S. Foreign Aid to Arab Nations

Washington : DC : USA | Feb 26, 2011 at 12:38 PM PST
6 0
Views: 1,306
 
A top US lawmaker vowed Thursday to cut the US State Department and foreign aid budgets

As oil prices surge and concerns mount that instability in the Middle East and North Africa may derail a global economic recovery, most Americans favor cutting U.S. foreign aid, particularly to Arab nations, according to a new national survey from Rasmussen Reports.

Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq and Egypt are among the top recipients of U.S. foreign aid, trailing only Israel in core assistance and diplomatic support. The Department of State/USAID 2012 budget for sustainable, long-term investments in operations and assistance totals $47 billion—only 1 percent more than comparable full-year 2010 levels. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says the budget requests provide the necessary resources for diplomats and development experts to address complex threats to U.S. national security.

Billions of U.S. dollars are provided in aid to the Middle East, including $5.3 billion in support to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.

Afghanistan: $2.3 billion in assistance to target the priority sectors of governance, rule of law, counternarcotics, agriculture, economic growth, health, infrastructure, and education in Afghanistan.

Pakistan: $1.9 billion in assistance to promote a secure, stable, democratic and prosperous Pakistan with a focus on energy, economic growth, agriculture, infrastructure and the delivery of health and education services, and strengthening the Government of Pakistan’s capacity to govern effectively and accountably.

Iraq: $1 billion in assistance to support Iraq’s economic growth activities in the provinces and at the local level with a particular focus on agriculture, job creation, and essential service provision as well as infrastructure support and educational and cultural exchange programs.

The U.S. State Department also allocated $7.4 billion for the support of key U.S. allies and partners critical to American national security, including:

- $3.1 billion in military assistance to Israel

- $1.3 billion in military assistance for Egypt, maintaining traditional levels of funding as we support the Egyptian people in their moment of transition

- $300 million in military assistance to Jordan

- $350 million for Pakistan

- $500 million + for 70 other strategic partners around the world

Another $9.1 billion is doled out for conflict resolution and economic security including:

- $3.3 billion in economic assistance to Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan to help strengthen governance, strengthen the rule of law (a subset of the frontline states mentioned above).

- Nearly $1 billion in economic and development assistance to help strengthen and stabilize fragile states, including support to Yemen, Haiti, Liberia, Bangladesh, and Sudan.

- $4.5 billion to provide peacekeeping and development assistance to help developing countries recover from crises, establish good governance, and engage in the global economy, which will create greater stability worldwide.

Now, as concerns mount over instability in the Middle East and North Africa most Americans favor curbing U.S. foreign aid, particularly to Arab nations, according to a new national survey from Rasmussen Reports.

The research shows that only 20% of Americans think the U.S. should continue providing foreign aid to Arab countries in the Middle East. More than half, 58%, says it should be cut entirely. On the other hand, about half, 51%, of Americans, support continued U.S. foreign aid to Israel, while 32% oppose it.

Still, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) has called for an end to all foreign aid, including the more than $3 billion the U.S. gives annually to Israel, as part of a proposed package of deep spending cuts.

Meanwhile, a growing number of Americans believe the U.S. should limit involvement in the upheaval in Libya and Egypt. In fact, 67% of Americans think the U.S. should stay out of the ongoing political unrest in Libya and other Arab nations. Only 29% think a change of government in any of these countries will be good for America. The survey finds that most Americans now fear that the political unrest roiling these countries may drag the U.S. country into another ongoing war.

Back
1 of 8
Next
Rasmussen said the NATO-led force was willing to provide "practical assistance" to Afghan reconciliation efforts
Rasmussen said the NATO-led force was willing to provide "practical assistance" to Afghan reconciliation efforts

Mary Elizabeth Dallas is based in New York City, New York, United States of America, and is an Anchor for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Posted By Jonalex Jonalex | about 1 year ago
It is hard to see so many billions be used for other countries when many Americans would love to see this go towards infrastructure and job creation.
Posted By DavaCastillo Dava Castillo | about 1 year ago
Scaling back on foreign aid can be done without jeopardizing American interests. But its a hard sell to our government, similarly to cutting defense spending. Both are considered essential to round out our foreign policy, and I don't think most question that. But in these times when Americans are being asked to tighten their belts, its not unreasonable to ask a reduction in defense and foreign aid.
Posted By Inbrains Inbrains | about 1 year ago
the idea is that even arab activists are looking toward ending this foreign aids coming from the United States , which makes us ask a very important question "if the donor and the beneficiary are both looking toward cutting out the aids, so what will be shown up in the next period?"

a very confusing question that will be answered by time
Posted By raymondlinner raymondlinner | about 1 year ago
When we cannot drive down a Road without holes in it foreign aid seems silly.
Posted By Punditty Punditty | about 1 year ago
Quality, not quantity.

We could cut foreign aid and still be a helpful presence in the region. However, as much as I prefer Sen. Paul's father to the senator, I have to agree that if we start cutting foreign aid, Israel cannot be immune to the budget cuts.
Posted By robertweller Robert Weller | about 1 year ago
I usually am with all of you, especially on rebuilding at home. But cutting aid to Arab countries now is not sound. They need help more than ever. A sort of Marshall Plan could restore our prestige in the region, and deter efforts by Iran to fill the vacuum.
Posted By raymondlinner raymondlinner | about 1 year ago
A Marshall plan with strings-tied to precise plans and behaviors ,ok. This does beg the question, why do we need to give money to nations swimming in oil?
Posted By AimeeMaliglig AimeeMaliglig | about 1 year ago
"Current US nuclear weapons policy is immoral, illegal, militarily unnecessary, and dreadfully dangerous. The risk of an accidental or inadvertent nuclear launch is unacceptably high.

Far from reducing these risks, the Bush administration has signaled that it is committed to keeping the US nuclear arsenal as a mainstay of its military power - a commitment that is simultaneously eroding the international norms that have limited the spread of nuclear weapons and fissile materials for 50 years.

Much of the current US nuclear policy has been in place since before I was secretary of defense, and it has only grown more dangerous and diplomatically destructive in the intervening years."
Posted By logicalreasoning logicalreasoning | about 1 year ago
Simple formula stop arm sales to all dictators but under strict supervision aid should be provided to the people of the those countries.
Posted By gino510 Gino C. Matibag | about 1 year ago
Why does the US spend billions of dollars helping oil-rich countries to start with? Do they really need it? Rated up!
Reply By MaryElizabethDallas Mary Elizabeth Dallas | about 1 year ago
If Mubarak reportedly has up to $70 billion in assets around the world..and many more of his cronies are also being investigated...(for alleged corrupt business dealings etc), I'm sure the economy and infrastructure of Egypt certainly does need USAID...
Posted By raaziaassad raazia assad | about 1 year ago
thanks 4 ur report
rated up
Advertisement
 

News Stories

 
  • Clinton Points East to Justify State Department’s Budget Needs

    Epoch Times
    Secretary of State Hillary Clinton participates in a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing on March 1, 2011 in Washington, DC. State Hillary Clinton has seized on the crucial role of US diplomacy in the Middle East amid recent uprisings to bolster...
  • Opening Remarks Before the House Foreign Affairs Committee

    Scoop
    Late last night, I came back from round-the-clock meetings in Geneva to discuss the unfolding events in Libya...We have joined the Libyan people in demanding that Qaddafi must go now, without further violence or delay and we are working to translate...
  • Proposed US Budget Trims Assistance To Caucasus, Central Asia

    Eurasianet
    US President Barack Obama sent Congress his $3.7 trillion budget proposal for 2012 on February 14, promising that it would reduce the deficit by $1.1 trillion over the next decade...Secretary of State Hillary Clinton described her department's budget...
  • Clinton Says All Options Open on Libya

    Voice of America
    Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says Washington will continue considering all options on Libya as long as the government there continues to "turn its guns on its own people." Clinton testified Tuesday at a congressional hearing on U.S. foreign...
  • Hillary`s Geneva trip seeks consensus on Libya!

    Zee News
    Hillary's Geneva trip seeks consensus on Libya Washington: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will try to rally support against Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi on Monday at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, a group Washington once dismissed as...
  • Obama and "grand strategy" | Michael Tomasky

    The Guardian
    Obama and "grand strategy" Here is an interesting tidbit from the Washington Post: Obama has not spoken publicly about Libya since last week, when he warned the Libyan leader against continued violence toward his people. Last weekend, the White House...

Blogs

 >
  • 2011: Labor's Last Stand Against Corporate Control of America

    www.antifascistencyclopedia.com
    Obama's capitulation on health care reform, without even attempting to stand for single-payer or medicare for all leaving the insurance companies in the drivers seat, was the first obvious blow to the Obama fantasy. ... Non-union workers are being
  • Our Secret Connections with the Muslim Brotherhood

    www.antifascistencyclopedia.com
    As US-backed strongmen around North Africa and the Middle East are being toppled or shaken by popular protests, Washington is grappling with a crucial foreign policy issue: how to deal with the powerful but opaque Muslim Brotherhood. ...
  • “LIES COME CRASHING DOWN” | Thoughts Of An Old Man

    jpfinn7.wordpress.com
    For their part, the Pakistani government and military adhere to a radically anti-American line, and Pakistan's powerful ISI intelligence service and large sections of its military continue to maintain intimate ties with al-Qaida and the Taliban. Last
  • Richard Perle: Libya Lobbyist & Gaddafi's PR Manager

    www.antifascistencyclopedia.com
    A later Monitor memo says the company will assist Libya in the creation of its National Security Council and the training of its employees, continue to help advise and coordinate Libya's modernization program, continue the cultivation ...

Images

 >
 

Related People

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_103

Sitemap


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2012. All rights reserved.