23 Experts claim surge in Afghanistan not working.
Local to Global News
 
 Connect 
Sign up now!

23 Experts claim surge in Afghanistan not working.

Kabul : Afghanistan | Dec 14, 2010 at 3:12 PM PST
9 0
Views: 1,136
 
General Stanley McChrystal said troops could take on the Taliban in Kandahar this summer

Of course one could also probably round up 24 others who would claim it was working fine or perhaps at least progressing but with speed bumps. The experts have written an open letter to president Obama.

The letter warns that the offensive of General Petraeus in the South is not going well. They also claim the war is financially unsustainable. Well if tax cuts for the rich are sustainable surely a war to keep Al Qaeda on the run and the Taliban busy killing NATO troops is just as sustainable. What is needed are jobs for the military industrial complex. The deficit can come later with cuts to the social safety net. This will happen as early as next year. Look at what is happening with austerity programs already well on their way in Europe. The stock market thinks it is OK. The vast majority of Americans want budget cuts. With the Republicans tax cuts and foreign wars they will come fast and furious.

The letter warns that security is worsening and Islamabad's support for the Taliban means "it is not realistic to bet on a military solution". The letter suggests that Washington should "seriously explore the possibility of a political settlement in which the Taliban are part of the Afghan political system". But this was already contemplated. However, the plan was for the surge to weaken the Taliban first so that the U.S. and Afghans could negotiate from a position of strength.

The letter says that the claim that security pockets in southern Afghanistan and Kabul have been established is misleading. The campaign is only "suppressing, locally and temporarily, the symptoms of the disease, but fails to offer a cure". Also, The counter-insurgency strategy "is now a full-scale military campaign causing civilian casualties and destruction of property"."Due to the violence of the military operations, we are losing the battle for hearts and minds in the Pashtun countryside, with a direct effect on the sustainability of the war." This seems to be correct. Stanley McChrystal was more cognizant of the problem of civilian casualties it seems. However the curbs on action was very unpopular with troops.

The letter also claims that plans to build an Afghan army and police force to take over security by 2014 is unrealistic. Almost 1,000 Canadian troops will be left in Afghanistan to help in this task after the Canadian combat mission ends next year.

Many districts now still remain outside of government control even in the south. Security is worsening in the north. Both insurgent attacks and civilian deaths are at record levels as are troop casualties. On Thursday Obama will no doubt give a quite different spin on what is happening.

Obama is to present the results of a one-year review of his Afghan policy. No doubt it will be moderately optimistic and call for staying the course. But we will see. I could be wrong.There will likely be briefings by bigwigs, Robert Gates and Hilary Clinton, after the report. A public version of the report is also to be released. Press Secretary Robert Gibbs has already said that Obama is confident the U.S. is making progress in Afghanistan so we more or less should know what to expect.

Back
1 of 17
Next
Troops on patrol in Afghanistan
Views on whether the US troop surge in Afghanistan is working vary widely P

northsunm32 is based in Brandon, Manitoba, Canada, and is an Anchor for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Posted By Punditty Punditty | over 1 year ago
This armchair pundit agrees with the 23 experts referred to in this headline.
Reply By robertweller Robert Weller | over 1 year ago
Here is another phrase, newer. Parlor assassins.
Posted By robertweller Robert Weller | over 1 year ago
This reminds me of a photographer/writer friend who was in Vietnam for years. He went there as a construction worker and ended up working for AP and others. When he was in hell and wrote about then when he got back to the office he found out that what he had written was all wrong. You see our Defense writer explained what was really going on. Matt thought Fred had a big globe that sat above the world and looked down to see what was going on here and there. God help us from this kind of reporting. And the arrogance that would cause the NYT and NPR to leave out Richard Holbrookes last words about Afghanistan.
Reply By KambizShabankare Alireza Shabankareh Bandari | over 1 year ago
Dear Robert
you are absolutely right. I was in Afghanistan as a journalist and exactly in south of it.
Posted By BorderExplorer BorderExplorer | over 1 year ago
I'm not an expert, so what I think carries no weight. Nevertheless, I side with the experts. And Punditty. Everytime.
Posted By rmang rmang | over 1 year ago
I do agree with all the above comments.
Nice knowing what's up in Afghanistan.

Worthwhile reading. Rated up!
Posted By BMcPherson BMcPherson | over 1 year ago
Imposed military 'solutions' have never worked in Afghanistan - not since Alexander the Great anyway.
Posted By northsunm32 northsunm32 | over 1 year ago
Thanks for all the comments. It will be interesting to see if Obama has anything new to say on Thursday. By what Gibbs has said it does not seem too likely.
Posted By GoldenParchment GoldenParchment | over 1 year ago
This was a great report. I hope he can do more on Thursday, but I am sceptical. Rated up!
Posted By miker5 miker5 | over 1 year ago
The politicos tell us if we don’t keep fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, that al-Qaeda will take over these countries and turn them into training grounds for terrorists. They would then presumably come here and kill more of us like they did on 9/11.
A more sensible solution might be to simply stop granting visas to al-Qaeda operatives to come to America in the first place. All nineteen of the 9/11 terrorists and the underwear bomber had government-issued visas. How would they have gotten here without them? Our east and west coasts are protected by vast oceans, and we can protect our north and south by bringing the troops home and stationing them on those borders.
Some concerns with this plan are:
1) How do we know who to refuse visas to?
The answer is anyone that is an Arab Muslim. This will involve some racial and ethnic profiling, which members of some political groups (that aren’t on their way to a war in the Middle East) may find more horrific than war. The moratorium on Arab Muslim visas can be lifted just as soon as the jihad is over.
2) If our troops secure the borders, how will nannies and gardeners from Mexico be able to come to America for a better life?
They will have to enter the U.S. legally by filling out an immigration application. This policy change will upset the political groups that fail to understand that there is nothing wrong with Mexico that the Mexicans can’t fix themselves.
3) What about terror cells already in the United States?
Sending more troops to the Middle East won’t get rid of them. If Homeland Security does its job, we can eventually disband the TSA.
4) If we pull out of Iraq and Afghanistan, won’t it be taken over by al-Qaeda?
Maybe, but since the President announced our withdrawal timeline, al-Qaeda operatives will just hide in the mountains or get some R&R in Iran until we leave and then take over anyway. We can’t save Iraq and Afghanistan unless we’re prepared to stay there indefinitely, or to neutralize Iran.
5) Americans want Osama bin Laden’s head. What about our revenge?
Give it up. Osama’s head isn’t worth the life of one more American soldier. Besides, the spread of Islam along with its militant faction is a numbers game we can’t win. We should cut our losses now and concentrate on protecting our homeland.

Please consider this politically incorrect but more cost-effective and practical alternative to war, and bring it up with your congressman.
Advertisement
 

News Stories

 
  • Obama signs off on Afghanistan war strategy

    NY Daily News
    In a lengthy review of U.S. and allied involvement in Afghanistan, Obama's national security team said Obamas's surge of 30,000 U.S. troops and the counterinsurgency tactics of Gen. David Petraeus have given Afghans the chance to take charge of their...
  • Obama to publicly discuss Af-Pak strategy

    United Press International
    A report on the U.S. strategy in Afghanistan and Pakistan focuses on three areas: the two countries and al-Qaida's senior leadership, the White House said. "In each area, the president and his team discussed both the progress that has been made, as...
  • Gibbs: No surprises in Afghanistan review

    The Hill
    President Obama met with his national security team Tuesday to discuss the draft annual review of his strategy in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Obama will address the report Thursday from the White House, but press secretary Robert Gibbs said not to...
  • Gates: Pace of US withdrawal depends on conditions

    Seattle Times
    Defense Secretary Robert Gates says the pace for withdrawing U.S. troops from Afghanistan depends on conditions on the ground there. He says that as Afghan security forces continue to improve, the U.S. drawdown will accelerate. Gates said Thursday...
  • Gates confident Afghans can take security leads

    Miami Herald
    Defense Secretary Robert Gates says he is confident Afghans can begin taking control of their own security starting in July. Gates says that transition is the only way for U.S. and coalition forces to end their combat commitments in the region.
  • Intel Reports Doubt Afghan War Success

    Fox
    Marines launched a major offensive into the Taliban heartlands of southern Afghanistan before dawn as President Obama's new war plan swung into action...Afghanistan reportedly say there is a limited chance of success unless Pakistan hunts down...

Blogs

 >
  • Richard Holbrooke dies: Veteran U.S. diplomat brokered Dayton ...

    kaystreet.wordpress.com
    ... of its strategy for the war in Afghanistan, which relies not just on military gains but development assistance and diplomatic initiatives with the governments in Kabul and neighboring Pakistan that had been his principal focus. ...
  • Obama war cabinet mulls Afghan review | France

    france.world-countries.net
    Since then, Obama has sacked his former top war general Stanley McChrystal for insubordination, seen his administration wage public spats with Karzai and traveled twice to Afghanistan, to honor the sacrifice of US soldiers. And though the war has
  • US Afghan report set to see progress and hurdles | Guns~N~Dolls

    www.gunsndolls.com
    And the review may leave fundamental questions over the future of the war unanswered: including; are US gains sustainable? Will Afghan forces merge into a true fighting force? Will the Taliban simply outwait foreign soldiers? ...
  • World War 12-14-10 | Dprogram.net

    dprogram.net
    Patrick Cockburn reports from Kabul on the rampant corruption that has left the country on its knees Read More Here. (TheLocal) – Military staffer knew about attacks: report. A Swedish Armed Forces (Försvarsmakten) employee warned an ... Richard

Images

 >
 

Videos

 >
 

Related People

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_103

Sitemap


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2012. All rights reserved.