September 29,2010, South Gate, California]-----should public school teachers’ performance be graded, then made public by printing them in the newspaper?
That’s just what The Los Angeles Times in South Gate, California is doing and one teacher’s suicide is being blamed on this practice.
Rigoberto Ruelas Jr., a 39 year old fifth grade teacher, was found dead at the foot of a remote forest bridge on Sunday. Authorities say the Miramonte Elementary School teacher apparently jumped and killed himself. However, the investigation is still ongoing, reports the Associated Press.
No conclusive reason is given for Ruelas Jr.’s alleged suicide, but the union and others are placing the blame squarely on the shoulders of The Times, who had recently published the teachers poor scores in their newspaper, which was “average” for English and “less than average” in math.
Those close to him say he was a good teacher and was very distraught over the public humiliation.
Everyone agrees that America’s public schools need improving, but many differ on ways to accomplish that goal.
The Times have decided that one way of achieving improvement in teachers performance was to print their overall grade in their paper. The ratings are divided into 5 categories: from least and less effective to average, more effective and most effective.
Teachers are reportedly outraged by this public rankings and urge a boycott of The Times until they stop printing these results.
They say basing a teacher’s performance solely on standardized test scores is unfair and counterproductive. Publishing them in the local paper is irresponsible and dangerous.
What do you think: should teachers be graded by how well children do on standardized tests scores? Should these ranking be published in the newspapers?
By Veronica P Roberts 9.29.10
Or add related content to this report
News Stories | Blogs | Images | Videos | Comments