US finally accepts Dutch skimmer help in BP oil spill
Local to Global News
 
 Connect 
Sign up now!

US finally accepts Dutch skimmer help in BP oil spill

Washington : DC : USA | Jun 14, 2010 at 7:40 PM PDT
20 10
Views: 5,100
 
Contract workers from BP use skimmers to clean oil from a marsh near Pass a Loutre

After initially declining, U.S. Government officials have decided to accept an offer from the Dutch government to send four large oil skimmers to the site of the BP Deepwater Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Oil skimmers are large arms that can be used by oil tankers to pump oil and water from the ocean surface into the tankers. The oil then rises to the top, while the water sinks to the bottom. The water is then pumped back out to sea, making space for more oil. Each system can collect 5,000 tons of oil each day.

Unlike the US, the Dutch have developed effective rapid response systems for oil spills. The Dutch skimming system has been used successfully in a number of smaller spills in Europe.

The Dutch first offered to fly their skimmer arm systems to the Gulf just a few days after the oil spill started. However, the offer was declined by EPA officials, who cited restrictions agains pumping any water with oil in it into the ocean (no matter how much oil was removed, no matter the overall environmental gain, in the process). No system can keep all the oily water in the ship.

One ton of oil is equal to approximately 7.3 barrels, so 5,000 tons a day is about 36,500 barrels per day. Collectively, the four skimmers can take up to 146,000 barrels per day.

The Netherlands-based Royal Dutch Shell is one of the largest global energy companies. Unlike the US, the Dutch have invested time and money developing state of the art rapid response systems for oil spills. The Dutch system has been used successfully in smaller European spills.

Dutch government officials in the Netherlands first offered to deliver their skimmer arm systems to the spill site just three days after the oil spill began. The story is the subject of an article by Yobie Benjamin for the Chronicle.

At the time, says Benjamin, U.S. officials rejected the offer because EPA regulations prohibit the discharge of water that contains oil into the ocean. He points out that by initially rejecting the Dutch offer, US officials missed an opportunity to collect much more oil and possibly to mitigate the damage.

Back
1 of 2
Next
US accepts Dutch skimmers help in BP gulf oil disaster
After initially declining, U.S. Government officials have decided to accept an offer from the Dutch government to send four large oil skimmers to the site of the BP Deepwater Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Jefferson_Adams is based in San Francisco, California, United States of America, and is a Stringer for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Posted By SoulJah_McGee SoulJah_McGee | almost 2 years ago
All we can say is that the oil spill is doing nothing but get worse and worse.We hacve thrown "our best shot" but we know we can do better. Americans need all the help they need to stop the flow of the oil or some how be able to use it.. Dutch governments, Americans should thank you for helping this just shows how helpless the United States are at home. Over All BP (British Petroleum) not only help with the oil spill problem but also be fined for the harm of the animals. Well till everything is better we can only try ans try again.
Posted By CJrun CJrun | almost 2 years ago
Some of the information in this News is inaccurate and all of it is unsourced. It appears to have been taken from other sources, without the benefit of crediting those sources. As such, this is disappointing.

No reader has any idea where the facts, or quotes, come from. Nobody has any idea whom Benjamin is. The numbers are wrong. Where does a relaxation of the Clean Water Act standards come from, a guess?

There are some facts, in the post linked below. If you have some facts and actual, attributed quotes, please provide them.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=558639285&v=app_2347471856#!/notes/chris-johnson/a-new-cj-rant/403245568167
Posted By Gerry1211 Gerry1211 | almost 2 years ago
CJrun
Please provide what information is false. And what is outsourced? The information?
Dutch News reported the offer of help THREE days after disaster struck. It was refused precisely on the grounds the article mentions. At that time they showed SOLID boom abt 2.5 feet high which will withstand 15kph winds, unlike our booms that are fine for rivers but not for oceans. They also showed the skimmers, all of which were developed and paid for by the Dutch Government and are stored in warehouses in case, God forbid, they'd have a disaster in the North Sea with one of the rigs there. At that time the question was asked "Who is in charge in America...Are they all children?" This from Dutch tv!! I speak the lingo!!
Now we have heard that the U.S. Government has accepted Dutch help and supposedly four skimming arms have been flown to the U.S. In fact listening to a recorded phone conversation from the Dutchman in charge(also on Dutch tv) 2 are already working while a third is being outfitted. (that totals 3 not 4) They require large tankers, which the U.S. does not have. So we need foreign tankers if we want to do things right. We've been listening to drivel from Washington that the Jones act prohibits foreign flag vessels to enter/work in the U.S. Its aim was to protect U.S. Merchant Marine. One can hardly call a foreign tanker in the pursuit of cleaning oil and saving the region from total destruction,as engaging in commerce. So that is a crock. During the grain sales to the Soviet Union in the 1970s, 50% of the vessels were U.S. flag and 50% were Soviet flag. So Soviet vessel were coming and going. I drew up the charter contracts, so I should know. So there is something else at play here. We might want to find out what that is. If Mr. Benjamin wrote an article quoting the above information, which is correct, GOOD ON HIM.
In the meantime I have not seen any large tankers with skimmers on our televisions. One would think that considering all the inertia of the past 7 weeks THAT would be a big deal.
Posted By willab willab | almost 2 years ago
Subtracting time needed to get to the area, at 146,000 barrels per day that translates into 9 million barrels that could have been processed since the inttial offer was made by the Dutch.
Advertisement
 

News Stories

 
  • BP Outlines Game PlanTo Speed Up Oil Effort

    Fox
    The drilling rig Discoverer Enterprise recovers leaking oil in the Gulf of Mexico on June 13. (AP Photo) As President Obama took his fourth trip to the Gulf Coast to survey oil spill damage, BP outlined a plan it said would speed up the containment...
  • More oil skimmers may be bound for Gulf of Mexico

    Seattle Times
    A decision is expected shortly on whether as many as 55 additional skimmers can be sent to help clean up oil from a gushing well in the Gulf of Mexico...James Watson tells The Associated Press that he expects to begin hearing Friday about whether his...
  • U.S. to tap foreign aid for spill

    Washington Post
    We'll let BP decide on what expertise they do need," State Department spokesman Gordon Duguid told reporters on May 19. "We are keeping an eye on what supplies we do need. And as we see that our supplies are running low, it may be at that point in...
  • US taps into foreign assistance for Gulf oil spill

    Inquirer.net
    DC, United StatesWith workers locked in a race against time to stem the massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill, the US government said Monday it has received aid offers from 17 countries and four international bodies so far. The US State Department said it...
  • Dutch say They Could Speed Gulf Oil Recovery with US Permission

    Voice of America
    Articles In Louisiana and other states on the Gulf of Mexico there is frustration over what many residents see as a slow response by the U.S. government to protecting coastal areas.  Some critics of the Obama administration cite offers by the...
  • New BP plan to collect 50,000 bpd

    Press TV
    A US Administration official requesting anonymity told AFP that after setting a deadline for the company, "BP is now stepping up its efforts to contain the leaking oil." "They have now outlined a path to contain more than 50,000 barrels of oil per...

Blogs

 >
  • StrategyDriven Editorial Perspective – Creating Event Certainty ...

    www.strategydriven.com
    The U.S. State Department notice characterized the assistance as being offers that “include experts in various aspects of oil spill impacts, research and technical expertise, booms, chemical oil dispersants, oil pumps, skimmers, and wildlife
  • White House refuses European assistance and technology to clean up ...

    www.thoughtsfromaconservativemom.com
    What do the Dutch have that the Americans don't when it comes to tackling oil spills at sea? “Skimmers,” answers Wierd Koops, chairman of the Dutch organisation for combating oil spills, Spill Response Group Holland. The Americans don't have spill

Images

 >
 

Videos

 >
 
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_103

Sitemap


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2012. All rights reserved.