Federal Budget Cuts Left Scientists Unprepared For BP Oil Spill
Local to Global News
 
 Connect 
Sign up now!

Federal Budget Cuts Left Scientists Unprepared For BP Oil Spill

New Orleans : LA : USA | Jun 13, 2010 at 10:06 AM PDT
15 0
Views: 733
 

BP's ability to convince the public that it has the Gulf oil spill under control disappeared weeks ago. Multiple attempts to stop or even slow the flow of oil from the undersea well ranged from laughable to obvious, but all have failed.

Oceanographers and marine scientists, who could have been helpful in assessing the spill and offering up ideas for minimizing the damage have either been brushed aside by BP or handicapped by more than a decade of quiet budget cuts.

The NY Times reports that oceanographers studying the Gulf of Mexico have continually requested federal funding for a network of radar, buoys and other sensors that would provide the equivalent of a weather forecast system for the area. Instead of responding favorably, especially in the years following Hurricane Katrina, federal funding for these programs has dropped by half or more in recent years.

As a result, oceanographers have been forced to rely on satellite snapshots and imperfect models to guess where the oil will travel, dragged by underwater currents that they can't accurately track.

Various media outlets are reporting that oil is already washing up on beaches in Alabama, and officials on Florida's west coast are waiting with baited breath as some rumors spread that the oil is only four miles away from their beaches as well.

Researchers at National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo. report that if their computer modeling is accurate, the strong loop current "could propel the oil to Florida's Atlantic coast within weeks, with the spill spreading as far north as Cape Hatteras in North Carolina by July or August before turning east" (NY Times Green Blog).

Although BP has been slow to accept help from conservation experts and federal scientists have been forced to keep their mouth shut about many of the initial air and water quality findings, the scientific community isn't waiting for approval to take action.

Non-Federal scientists met at Louisiana State University on Thursday to discuss the urgent issues involved with both short-term response actions for the spill and long-term monitoring of the environmental and human health impacts.

"As the efforts continue in the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, we need to ensure that we bring the full capabilities of the nation's research community to deal with the short-term and long-term impacts of this incident," said Robert B. Gagosian, President & CEO of the Consortium for Ocean Leadership in a press release.

Like this story? Follow Beth on Twitter or Stumble!

Source: Care2

Back
1 of 1
Next
Will oil reach the East Coast before the spill is stopped?
Image Credit: Flickr Creative Commons - deepwaterhorizonresponseU.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 2nd Class Luke Pinneo.

Beth Buczynski is based in Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America, and is a Stringer for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Posted By DavaCastillo Dava Castillo | almost 2 years ago
Oceanographers should be given research grants for weather forecasting in the gulf and also in other coastal areas. Also, similar to environmental impact studies that are required for land development and are the responsibility of the developer, oil companies should be responsible for R & D and implementing weather forecasting devices that can give fair warning when oil rigs could be in danger due to weather events. This should be part of leasing agreements should oil drilling be deemed safe in the future, therefore, built into the system.
Posted By slydog Andy Mathisen | almost 2 years ago
Much like governments (like Canada and the US) puts foreign observers on fishing vessels from outside the country onboard ships...so should drill rigs have a resident Oceanographer AND Biologist on board to both monitor and collect data around these rigs. The Feds and industry could jointly fund a program like this.
Posted By weinmang weinmang | almost 2 years ago
I think quite a few journalists need to read history. Budget cuts have nothing to do with deep water drilling and our woefully inadequate response to the current catastrophe.
1) President Clinton signed into law a royalty exemption for deep water drilling. This caused a ten fold expansion in energy production from deep water wells. However, no funds flowed to Minerals Management Service to prepare for any problems. No funds equals no action.
2) The Merchant Marine Act of 1920 (Jones Act) essentially prohibits non-US flagged vessels from assisting us. Several countries offered help but were turned down because of that act.
3) No one in our government bothered to ask BP whether the company lacked anything to clean up the spill or to stop the spill.
4) The Federal response to private entrepreneurs' offers of assistance has been silence.
No wonder we are where we are.
Greg Weinman
gregory@messerweinman.com
Posted By DavaCastillo Dava Castillo | almost 2 years ago
Thank you for the additional inforamtion weinmang.

Requests for waivers in the Jones Act for certain provisions of the act can be reviewed by the United States Maritime Administration on a case-by-case basis. Waivers have been granted in cases of national emergencies or in cases of strategic interest. For instance, declining oil production prompted MARAD to grant a waiver to operators of the 512-foot Chinese vessel Tai An Kou to tow an oil rig from the Gulf of Mexico to Alaska. The jackup rig will be under a two-year contract to drill in the Alaska's Cook Inlet Basin. The waiver to the Chinese vessel is said to be the first of its kind granted to an independent oil-and-gas company.

In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff temporarily waived the U.S. Shipping Act for foreign vessels carrying oil and natural gas from September 1 to September 19, 2005.

If foreign vessels would make a significant commitment, perhaps the U.S. should consider a waiver in this case.
Posted By namakuimut namakuimut | almost 2 years ago
Oil company BP is a capitalist enterprise, which undermines the natural resources wherever he is trying to...
Posted By rmang rmang | over 1 year ago
Hi!

This is a very good topic. Thank you for sharing.

I rated you up.

All the best,
rmang
Posted By raaziaassad raazia assad | over 1 year ago
u choose very good topic thank u 4 sharing
Posted By Adebanjos Adebanjos | 6 months ago
Excellent written principle and attitude. rated up!
Advertisement
 

Related Allvoices Contributions

News Stories

 
  • Gulf Coast radar system limitations thwarted tracking of BP oil spill

    The Naples Daily News
    The team proposed expanding the radar network to include 36 sites along the Gulf coast and put the cost at about $2 million per year for five years...When oil began spewing from the blown-out Deepwater Horizon well, Stephan Howden started scrambling.
  • Researchers Sail to the Spill Site

    The New York Times
    17 am One journey I'll be following closely over the next week is the voyage of the Cape Hatteras, a 135-foot research vessel operated by the Duke/University of North Carolina Oceanographic Consortium. As we reported here last week, scientists from...
  • BP oil spill: Robert Gibbs gives preview of Obama's Tuesday night ...

    The Examiner
    White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs gave an overview of President Barack Obama's Tuesday night address from the Oval Office to the nation on the BP oil spill disaster and steps forward for the nation to make sure such a catastrophe never happens...
  • BP Spill Response Costs Rise To $1.6 Billion

    Fox News
    BP said Monday that the cost of its response to the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico has reached $1.6 billion, including new grants of $25 million each to the states of Florida, Alabama and Mississippi and the first $60 million in funds for the...
  • BP's response to massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico now costing $1.6 ...

    Examiner
    BP's costs for responding to the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico have risen to $1.6 billion. According to a company news release, that includes new $25 million grants the British oil giant has given to Florida, Alabama and Mississippi. It...
  • Q&A: How much oil has spewed into the gulf?

    Moreover Silicon Valley
    Teams of scientists have employed various methods to calculate the flow rate, and with each study, they have revised estimates upward. Meanwhile, others are working to pinpoint where the oil has gone and where it might head next...Probably between 1...
 
Advertisement
 

Blogs

 >
  • 89.3 WFPL | Oil Spill Affecting Pricing, Availabilty of Seafood ...

    www.wfpl.org
    The oil that has spread throughout the Gulf of Mexico since April's spill is now impacting local availability and pricing of some seafood. It comes after the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has closed about 32 percent of ...
  • Oil Spill | Alea

    www.aleablog.com
    If the oil disperses evenly, the impact is near zero, if it doesn't, most of the water in the Gulf is unaffected. The Gulf war oil spill off Kuweit was much worse than that, 10 times the volume oil covering a much smaller area and the ...
  • Gulf oil spill: 'Kevin Costner solution' has green light, but no ......

    latimesblogs.latimes.com
    Actor Kevin Costner's oil-spill device has all the approval it needs to scoop the goop from the Gulf of Mexico, but is waiting for money from BP, according to the actor and his business partner. BP has issued a letter...
  • Online Reputation Management Case Studies: BP Oil Spill, Toyota ...

    blog.searchenginewatch.com
    Two years ago, I wrote "Online Reputation Management Requires Cabinet War Rooms." In the post, I asked, "Is your company prepared for the inevitable crisis to come?" Today, one of the most important lessons learned from the BP oil spill ...

Images

 >
 

Videos

 >
 
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_103

Sitemap


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2012. All rights reserved.