Arizona school district becomes first to join litigation opposing SB1070
Local to Global News
 
 Connect 
Sign up now!

Arizona school district becomes first to join litigation opposing SB1070

Tucson : AZ : USA | Jun 09, 2010 at 12:39 PM PDT
14 4
Views: 542
 
award wining Sunnyside Unified School District students

At its June 8 meeting, the Governing Board of the Sunnyside Unified School District (SUSD) voted to join civil litigation opposing SB1070, thereby becoming the first school district in Arizona to enter into litigation opposing the immigration law. The controversial law is slated to go into effect on July 29, 2010.

At a special meeting May 25, the SUSD Governing Board adopted a resolution opposing SB1070 as a law which "has a significantly negative impact on all students, teachers and community" and "seriously jeopardizes public safety and education and drives a wedge between law enforcement, educational institutions and ethnic communities."

The school district joins the suit a Tucson police officer filed to block the law which has sparked national debate and a multitude of lawsuits. The City of Tucson voted to join the lawsuit last week.

The resolution the board approved calls for finding pro bono legal representation.

It states that the Sunnyside District views the enforcement of the law as unconstitutional, calls for federal comprehensive immigration reform, and urges other school districts to oppose SB1070 and support efforts to develop reasonable alternatives to the law that "recognize the need for federal-level reform that assists struggling border

communities while respecting the humanity of all the people living and working in these communities."

Sunnyside School Board president Louie Gonzales reviewed some of the boards concerns to a local news channel:

"We do have officers on the campuses. We have officers at our functions, football games. Well, how is that going to correlate with what we are doing. Are these children going to have to carry their documents. Are they going to be affected? Are they going to be detained until documents can be provided?"

Gonzales also mentioned the concern that officers who work with students on campuses may lost students' trust, making the schools less safe.

The school district encompasses the southern part of the City of Tucson and areas adjacent in Pima County, including the northern two miles of the Tohono O'Odham Nation.

Back
1 of 2
Next
SUSD Governing Board
members:  Robert Jaramillo, Member, Eric Giffin, Member, Louie C. Gonzales, President, Magdalena Barajas, Clerk, Eva Carrillo Dong, Member. Photo credit: from SUSD website.

BorderExplorer is based in Davenport, Iowa, United States of America, and is an Anchor for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Posted By DavaCastillo Dava Castillo | almost 2 years ago
Thank you for the report Billie.

In addition to the concerns of School Board President Gonzales, I would add that parents might be afraid to allow their children to go to school adding another layer of social anxiety. Children need to be in school and not roaming about without supervision.
Reply By Truthteller Truthteller | almost 2 years ago
If they are here legally they can go to school. If they are NOT here legally then they shouldn't be in OUR schools costing us MORE money!!!
AMEN
Posted By firesisle Hardy Wright | almost 2 years ago
"At a special meeting May 25, the SUSD Governing Board adopted a resolution opposing SB1070 as a law which 'has a significantly negative impact on all students, teachers and community' and 'seriously jeopardizes public safety and education and drives a wedge between law enforcement, educational institutions and ethnic communities.'

Absolute hogwash. How can maintaining the law in a manner which respects and protects the civil rights of all parties have "a significant negative impact on all students, teachers, and community"?

School Board President Gonzales is a complete idiot. Why should parents be afraid to let their kids go to school? Nobody is going to be asking kids for their "papers". The idea is ludicrous. Kids don't have any papers, and aren't required by law to carry any.

Stupid is as stupid does, and Gonzales is a perfect example. His own actions promote a lack of respect for law and law enforcement.
Reply By Digger55 Digger55 | almost 2 years ago
You know, Wright, calling other people "idiots" because they do things you don't agree with, only reflects back on your personal bias and intolerance.

This school board has every right to join a legitimate law suit for legitimate reasons. That is how democracy works, whether you agree with it or not.

Respect for law enforcement? There are police officers included in this law suit. There are entire police associations that have come out against this law.They think it should be handled by the federal government.

Stupid is as stupid does? Wow...that's really profound.
Reply By LAVanNatta Lori VanNatta | almost 2 years ago
Arizona Police Associate just endorsed Jan Brewer :-)
Maybe there is just one crybaby who should go back to his own country?!?!??
Reply By nathanielinbrazil Nathaniel Hines | almost 2 years ago
Insightful. Well-grounded comment.
Reply By LAVanNatta Lori VanNatta | almost 2 years ago
YES digger it is much better to call people narrow minded and accuse them of brow-beating and tell them you wish they would shut up is MUCH more intelligent.
YOU are the moron.
I notice you have a lot to say about what everyone else write but you STILL have NOT written one piece yourself.
Wonder why????
Posted By DavaCastillo Dava Castillo | almost 2 years ago
SB 1070 does not state an exemption for children. It states "persons" and does not address the status of a minor. If parents are illegal and their children go to school and are questioned about immigration status this could lead to the parents falling under the "reasonable suspicion" clause. The same situation could apply in seeking medical care. If they present at the emergency room, will they be questioned regarding their immigration status? This is a good question, because it might deter people from seeking care.
Posted By LAVanNatta Lori VanNatta | almost 2 years ago
Gee - Imagine that ---THEN they should go home to their own country for education and medical care.
VERY SIMPLE SOLUTION!!!!
DUH?!!?!?!??!
Posted By LAVanNatta Lori VanNatta | almost 2 years ago
I have a really good idea, how about if the state doesn't give these people any state aid until they quit aiding and abetting criminals.
NOT THAT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE AND NEWSWORTHY.
NOT all these trumped up sensational cry babies!
And, maybe we should all start saying that four of them are racist.
I repeat when will any of you care one iota about the human rights of LEGAL AMERICAN CITIZENS????
Posted By Kristina84 Kristina84 | almost 2 years ago
Before America used to be ok with illegal flood coming across Mexican border. Why not...they work for chicken feed, do the dirty work...Otherwise, believe me, borders would have been already secured! But now, during the economical slow down too many illegals appeared to reside in US. So the American society isn't complacent as before. They say - "ok, we do not need you anymore, go back home." It's the same when you take a hungry dog from the street, give it food, comfort and after some time kick it out of the house. That's why I think we need a comprehensive immigration reform rather than Arizona New Immigration Law...and maybe amnesty for those who lived in this country more than 5 years and don't have any criminal record. And of course, we must close our borders from illegal invasion once for all!

Nevertheless, this is my personal view of this problem, share your thoughts on http://immigration.civiltalks.com/
Posted By mhatter99 Martin Kloess | almost 2 years ago
Let me simply say: At what point did anyone see this coming?
Martin
Posted By Coarsegold Coarsegold | almost 2 years ago
Yes, the school board has the right to join in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the law. Whether it is in the best interest of the school district or not, I can't say.

Much of the problem regarding this issue is that the United States has become a welfare state, where money from some people is taken and then redistributed to others. That is charity. And charity used to be the province of individuals, churches, and private charity organizations, all of which were much more frugal and efficacious with their money than federal or state bureaucrats. Whenever the government gets involved there is always waste and corruption. Further, there is no free medical or schooling for immigrants in Mexico. And if you are there illegally, and discovered--and unable to pay a bribe--you will be deported.

Also, there is no way in reality that we can do what is necessary to "close our borders from illegal invasion once [and] for all." However, with that in mind, if you want to read a satirical piece dealing with that issue, you can go to http://logicversusemotion.blogspot.com/2009/02/mexicans-why-are-they-here.html and read "Mexicans, why are they here?"
Advertisement
 

News Stories

 

Videos

 >
 
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_103

Sitemap


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2012. All rights reserved.