Army Sending Long Range Rifles To Afghanistan
Local to Global News
 
 Connect 
Sign up now!

Army Sending Long Range Rifles To Afghanistan

Kabul : Afghanistan | Mar 22, 2010 at 11:07 AM PDT
25 15
Views: 3,007
 
M14 Enhannced Battlefield Rifle

Double the killing power

The Army is sending rifles to Afghanistan that will double the killing range of troops.

The M14 Enchanced Battle Rifle is accurate out to 800 yards, Army Times reported.

“It’s a very precise weapon system,” said Spc. Andrew McMeley, a squad designated marksman serving in Afghanistan with B Company, 2nd Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment. “All the improvements on it are fantastic.” Up to now only a squad’s designated marksmen got the long-range rifle.

Not all soldiers will get them. Only 5,000 have been ordered. That means there will be two members of each squad with one.

“Comments from returning noncommissioned officers and officers reveal that about 50 percent of engagements occur past 300 meters,” Maj. Thomas Ehrhart wrote in his Nov. 30 position paper “Increasing Small Arms Lethality in Afghanistan: Taking Back the Infantry Half-Kilometer” at the School of Advanced Military Studies at the Army’s Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, Kan.

Units will get three days of training when they receive the new weapons.

Liabilities are that the weapon’s ammo is heavier, and it is more difficult to maintain. Soldiers who have tried them out say they are more difficult to take apart and clean.

The Army Times report did not mention how the weapon will perform in close quarters, such as inside buildings. Another question is whether they will have detachable optics.

Wikipedia link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mk_14_Mod_0_Enhanced_Battle_Rifle

Back
1 of 2
Next
032210_army_m14_640.JPG
032210_army_m14_640.JPG

Robert Weller is based in Denver, Colorado, United States of America, and is an Anchor for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Posted By bassmanfinn Ryan Finney | about 2 years ago
Sounds like a great idea to me! I bet those rifles are awesome!
Posted By robertweller Robert Weller | about 2 years ago
Some of models I saw had long sights that would seem to interfere with fighting in close quarters. It's not clear whether detachable sights will be available. In dusty Afghanistan some soldiers may be spending a lot of their time cleaning these things. Further they and their parts are heavier. Only time will tell. The Army hasn't had a good record in selecting rifles since world war 2.
Reply By albertacowpoke Karl Gotthardt | about 2 years ago
It seems to me that they will designate two soldiers per squad as sharpshooters to take out longer range targets. So it looks like there will be six of those weapons per platoon and possibly another in platoon headquarters.
Reply By albertacowpoke Karl Gotthardt | about 2 years ago
Here is a wikepedia link with more details
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mk_14_Mod_0_Enhanced_Battle_Rifle
Posted By robertweller Robert Weller | about 2 years ago
Karl: I have never been a soldier but I have been with soldiers from several armies when they went from house to house I wouldn't want to have to use that monstrosity. I also thought most of the fighting was close quarters. Do you think these rifles can be effective in such situations. It would seem the shotguns the Army is working on would be better. But it looks like every squad is going to be stuck with these, regardless of their task.
Reply By albertacowpoke Karl Gotthardt | about 2 years ago
This rifle would not be suited for house to house. It would definitely be a monstrosity to carry around. I know when we were in Bosnia sharpshooters as opposed to snipers were in high demand. The sharpshooters were soldiers within an infantry company that were designated to take out high value targets up to 1000 meters. The normal assault rifle, the M 16 or C7 what we call the Canadian version is not suited for these longer ranges.

I would assume that the M 14 has been introduced to serve a function similar to that of a Sharpshooter. Our sharpshooters used a bolt action Sniper Rifle.
Posted By TwobirdsFlyingPub TwobirdsFlyingPub | about 2 years ago
The EBR is an outstanding platform. The chassis adds a level of functionality that was previously unavailable. The concerns about their suitability for CQC and CQB are not a real issue because the DMRs, if properly employed, will provide cover for the entry team to make sure that you have a secure perimeter.
Afghanistan, unlike Iraq, is not "generally" considered a MOTU theater. The Taliban make extensive use of the terrain offered by the Hindu Kush so engagements are more likely to occur in mountainous areas. Those of you that hunt in the Rockies know what I'm talking about. Six hundred yard shots are common.
Posted By robertweller Robert Weller | about 2 years ago
I understand your points. But I don't think that you can guarantee that things will always play out that way. The squad that is available will go in ... with the weapons they have. And there have been many raids into suspected taliban houses, often leaving civilians dead. nice try. but like isn't that simple.
Advertisement
 

Related Allvoices Contributions

News Stories

 
  • Marksmen issued better rifles in Afghanistan

    The Frontier Post
    The Army is doubling the number of 7.62mm weapons in the infantry squad, increasing soldiers’ long-range killing power in the wide-open expanses of Afghanistan. Since the beginning of the war, a typical nine-man infantry squad has included a single...
  • British soldier killed in Afghanistan

    ITN
    The soldier, from A Company 3rd Battalion The Rifles, died as a result of an explosion which occurred in Helmand Province on Monday morning. In a statement, Lieutenant Colonel David Wakefield said: "The soldier was operating in support of a foot...
 
Advertisement
 

Images

 >
 

Videos

 >
 
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_103

Sitemap


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2012. All rights reserved.