Military Response, 9/11 “Shoot-Down” Authority Impacted by Secret Directive
Local to Global News
 
 Connect 
Sign up now!

Military Response, 9/11 “Shoot-Down” Authority Impacted by Secret Directive

Washington : DC : USA | Jan 14, 2010 at 12:28 PM PST
9 0
Views: 1,136
 

FROM THE COINCIDENCE FILE:

By Ken Boyte

Three months before Sept. 11, 2001, the Bush administration changed the protocol for responding to commercial hijackings.

Donald Rumsfeld, secretary of defense under President George W. Bush, issued directive J-3 CJCSI 3610.01A to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on June 1, 2001.

Prior to Rumsfeld’s protocol change, some experts believe that the authority to shoot down a hijacked airplane was delegated by the president to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The 9/11 Commission concluded that approval was needed from the president to shoot down the hijacked aircraft.

Rumsfeld’s position has been that the 2001 directive merely updated a 1997 directive by clarifying language relating to the protocol for responding to hijacked aircrafts.

Directive J-3 CJCSI 3610.01A—which Rumsfeld issued to the chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff on June 1, 2001—states: “When notified that military escort aircraft are needed in conjunction with an aircraft piracy (hijacking) emergency, the DDO, NMCC, will notify the appropriate unified command or USELEMNORAD to determine if suitable aircraft are available and forward the request to the secretary of defense for approval in accordance with DODD 3025.15, paragraph D.7.”

The language “aircraft piracy” or “hijackings” is not included in the 1997 directive, which J-3 CJCSI 3610.01A replaced.

Compare section 4.5 of the directive 3025.15 issued Feb. 18, 1997: “With the exception of immediate responses under imminently serious conditions, as provided in subparagraph 4.7.1 below, any support that requires the deployment of forces or equipment assigned to a combatant command by secretary of defense memorandum, must be coordinated with the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Saff. The chairman shall evaluate each request to use combatant command forces or equipment to determine if there is a significant issue requiring secretary of defense approval. Orders providing assistance to civil authorities that are approved by the secretary of defense involving the use of combatant command forces or equipment shall be issued through the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Upon secretary of defense approval, the secretary of the army, when designated ‘the DoD Executive Agent,’ shall implement and oversee DoD support in accordance with such approval orders.”

Section 4.6 continues: “This Directive does not address non-Federalized National Guard assets in support of local and/or state civil agencies approved by the governor.”

Section 4.7.1: “Requests for an immediate response (i.e., any form of immediate action taken by a DoD component or military commander to save lives, prevent human suffering, or mitigate great property damage under imminently serious conditions) may be made to any component or command.”

Chain of Command

On Sept. 11, 2001, General Richard Myers was acting chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Henry Shelton, chairman, was out of the country. General Myers was promoted to chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff three days after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

According to Myers’ testimony before the 9/11 Commission on June 17, 2004, “The Chairman serves as the principal military advisor to the president, the National Security Council, and the secretary of defense; and makes recommendations to Congress. The chairman’s responsibilities include strategic planning, contingency planning and readiness of the armed forces.

“Unified command roles are directed by Title 10 and the Unified Command Plan. Each of the combatant commander’s chain of command runs through the secretary of defense to the President. Several other documents outlined the armed forces’ roles and responsibilities in combating terrorism: The National Security Strategy for a Global Age (2000), Presidential Decision Directives 39 (1995) and 62 (1998), and the National Military Strategy (1997)."

Regardless of the motives behind Rumsfeld's protocol change on June 1, 2001—which specifically states that the secretary of defense must approve the shooting down of hijacked airplanes—the secretary of defense could not be found the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, from the time the hijackings began until the last airplane had crashed.

The Los Angles Times reported on Aug. 13, 2004: “Rumsfeld was missing in action that morning, 'out of the loop' by his own admission. For more than two hours after the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) became aware that the first plane had been violently overtaken by Middle Eastern men, the man whose job it was to order air cover over Washington did not show up in the Pentagon's command center. It took him almost two hours to 'gain situational awareness,' he told the commission. He didn't speak to the vice president until 10:39 a.m., according to the report. Since that was more than 30 minutes after the last hijacked plane crashed, it would seem to be an admission of dereliction of duty.”

According to the official conclusion of the 9/11 Commission, Dick Cheney, vice president under Bush, did not authorize NORAD jetfighters to shoot down the hijacked airplanes until after the last aircraft crashed into the Pentagon.

The final report of the 9/11 Commission does not reference the protocol change for responding to hijackings that Rumsfeld issued on June 1, 2001.

The Bush administration repeatedly blocked the investigation into the events of Sept. 11, 2001, according to CNN News and The New York Times.

No one in the Bush administration has ever been held accountable for the breakdowns of 9/11. Instead, people got promoted.

© Copyright 2010 by Ken Boyte

All rights reserved.

READ MY NOVEL ON ALL VOICES @

http://tinyurl.com/c2mjrx

Sources:

CNN News (Jan. 29, 2002). “Bush Asks Daschle to Limit Sept. 11 Probes.”

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/01/29/inv.terror.probe/

CNN News (May 17, 2002). “Bush, GOP Blast Calls for 9/11 Inquiry.”

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/05/16/president.gop.senators/

CNN News. (Feb. 25, 2004). “Hastert to Block 9/11 Commission Extension.”

http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/02/25/911.commission/index.html

Eggen, Dan, and William Branigan (June 17, 2004). “Air Defenses Faltered on 911, Panel Finds.” The Washington Post.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A48471-2004Jun17.html

Eggen, Dan (Aug. 2, 2006). “9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon: Allegations Brought to Inspector General.” The Washington Post.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/01/AR2006080101300.html?sub=new

Farmer, John (2009). The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11. Penguin Group.

Glain, Stephen (Sept. 28, 2009). “The American Leviathan.” The Nation.

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090928/glain

Gordon, Greg (July 31, 2004). “Dayton: FAA, NORAD Hid 9/11 Failures.” The Star Tribune.

Healy, Gene (Dec. 17, 2003). “Deployed in the USA: The Creeping Militarization of the Home Front.” Policy Analysis.

http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa503.pdf

Myers, Richard (June 17, 2004). “Statement of General Richard Myers, USAF Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff, Before the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States.”

http://www.9-11commission.gov/hearings/hearing12/myers_statement.pdf

National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (July, 2004). Washington, D.C.

http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/index.htm

National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (May 23, 2003). Washington, D.C.

http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hearing2/9-11Commission_Hearing_2003-05-23.htm

http://www.9-11commission.gov/hearings/hearing1/witness_kleinberg.htm

North Jersey Media Group (May 23, 2003). “Atlantic City F-16 Fighters Were Eight Minutes Away from 9/11 Hijacked Planes.”

http://www.prisonplanet.com/051203atlanticcityfighters.html

Project for the New American Century Corporation (Sept. 2000). “International Relations in the Age of Empire: Rebuilding America’s Defenses.” Washington, D.C.

http://tamilnation.org/intframe/000901pnac.htm

Rumsfeld, Donald (Sept. 11, 2001). “Public Statement of Donald Rumsfeld at the Pentagon.”

Sheehy, Gail. (Aug. 13, 2004). “Rumsfeld and Bush Failed Us on Sept. 11.” Los Angeles Times.

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0813-08.htm

Shenon, Philip (Feb. 26, 2004). “Bush to Limit Testimony Before 9/11 Panel.” The New York Times.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/26/politics/26PANE.html

Spencer, Lynn (2008). Touching History: The Untold Story of the Drama That Unfolded in the Skies Over America on 9/11. Free Press.

US Department of Defense Directive 3025.15 (Feb. 18, 1997). “Military Assistance to Civilian Authorities.”

http://usmilitary.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/html/302515.htm

US Department of Defense Directive J-3 CJCSI 3610.01A (June 1, 2001). “Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction.”

http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/cjcsd/cjcsi/3610_01a.pdf

Vogel, Steve (April 8, 2002). “Flights of Vigilance Over the Capital.” The Washington Post.

Back
1 of 1
Next
F15 Jet Fighter
One of the military aircraft that did not prevent the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Ken Boyte is based in Castroville, California, United States of America, and is a Stringer for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Posted By albertacowpoke Karl Gotthardt | over 2 years ago
Great background research. Thanks very much for this Ken. I clicked and tweeted this story.
Posted By Deepizzaguy George Vieto | over 2 years ago
Thank you for this news report.
Posted By zubairdogar zubairdogar | over 2 years ago
Thanks you
Hi & Salam; I add my self in your FAN list i am very thankful to you if you add yourself in My FAN list Thanks zubair dogar
I want, you always share your reports And news by allvoices FAN community with me.
Posted By Punditty Punditty | over 2 years ago
Dereliction of duty defined by USlegal.com:

Dereliction of duty generally refers to a failure to conform to rules of one's job, which will vary by tasks involved. It is a failure or refusal to perform assigned duties in a satisfactory manner. Dereliction of duty on the part of an employee may be cause for disciplinary action, which will vary by employer. It may refer to a failure by an organization member to abide by the standing rules of its constitution or by-laws or perform the duties of the position appointed to.

---
With that much responsibility, surely the "rules" governing the Secretary of Defense's job include being able to deal with a national defense emergency at a moment's notice.

Forget "Where's Waldo?" a more pressing question is "Where Was Rummy?"
Posted By PsychedelicSunrise Ken Boyte | over 2 years ago
Right on, brothers and sisters!
Posted By Shirley66 Shirley66 | over 2 years ago
Is there some unvoiced "agenda" in all of this protocol changes?
Posted By arifbashir Muhammad Arif Bashir | over 2 years ago
Thanks for reporting, and shearing.
Advertisement
 

Related People

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_103

Sitemap


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2012. All rights reserved.