Another population of the world, the Caribbean, needs certainty and security for its people. The UK has taken over the government of Turks and Caicos Islands and is rumored to have designs on Cayman as well.
Turks and Caicos had enjoyed the influx of economic growth from foreign investors who are now reluctant to invest in a country that has no real certainty of its future.
The Turks and Caicos Islands, an island territory of the UK, has enjoyed autonomous self-government since the 1970s with its own constitution. The UK investigated allegations by a group of complainants that corruption was occurring in Turks and Caicos.
Sir Robin Auld, from the UK, made an investigation into the allegations of corruption, which was limited to targeting several resort developers and the embattled Michael Misick administration with respect to accusations of Crown land abuses.
In August 2009, the UK suspended the constitution of Turks and Caicos for a period of at least two years. Since UK's arrival, one economic disaster after another has tainted the island's reputation and thus confidence with the international community.
Turks and Caicos' largest economic stimulus comes from resorts. This is not ONLY because of jobs for the islanders but also due to the revenue brought in by the tourism draw alluring people from all of the world to spend their dollars in Turks and Caicos.
However, the UK's affect on the island has caused a down turn in the tourism industry. The UK has implemented tax hikes and benefit cuts, causing many businesses and individuals to fear bankruptcy.
Several resort developments went out of business due to loss of funding reportedly resulting from the corruption allegations. This includes the posh Nikki Beach Hotel and more recently the half-billion dollar Dellis Cay development just to name two; but there are many others that have gone belly up.
Why is all of this happening? Why is there a mass closing of resorts, nevermind costing thousands of jobs, but what about the bigger picture: tourism revenue?
It is unlikely that you could scare up a group of more than 10 people who wanted to give up their right to have a self-governed constitution. In fact, some concerned citizens contend that if UK is sincerely there to bail out Turks and Caicos, why is it not financially doing so? Why is UK putting the burden back on the people by raising taxes and cutting benefits?
Recently exposed is that a handful of UK supporters using pseudonyms are the individuals who readily take credit for bringing UK to the islands. These individuals have not been properly investigated by the UK's Commission of Enquiry, although everyone else had been thoroughly scrutinized. For example, had the UK properly investigated the intentions of the so-called whistle blowers, it would have found their deep ties to developers. It also would have found that they had positions as leaders of a political party called the PDM which had been trying to entrap the former premier. Their goal is said to be to take over political power of the islands.
This is not to say that Michael Misick did nothing wrong, but is to point out that all political parties folded amidst allegations of corruption. These are the same whistle blowers who are calling on UK to investigate other developers for corruption yet have deep financial ties with competing developers.
The population of the sordid whistle blowers are said to be merely a handful who have a Crown land and political agenda.
I urge Democracy International to have all of these "individuals" in the same room to testify in person. It is improper for the UK to consider the majority of the complaints from the minority of the people using duplicative and/or orchestrated tales. Since when has that been a proper standard of investigation and motivation to invade a territory and take its autonomous constitution?
What's more, let's then see the UK's investigation of the individual's crying foul. The UK investigated most everyone else in Turks and Caicos, ostensibly hand-wringing over the whereabouts of a long ago former registrar shouting the need to investigate his former records. Yet it missed an investigation into the pasts of the whistle blowers who stand something to gain?
Democracy International, please find out the real reason why UK suspended the citizens' constitutional right to a jury trial across the board for the entire population.
The UK states that the people of Turks and Caicos are not fit to serve on a jury panel because they are corruptible.
Taking away constitutional rights is never tolerated in any part of the world. Do not let Turks and Caicos free-fall backwards.
http://tciwatch.com
Constitutional right to jury trials suspending in Turks and Caicos
http://blogcritics.org/politics/article/
http://www.suntci.com/index.php?p=story&
http://www.suntci.com/index.php?p=story&
Or add related content to this report
News Stories | Blogs | Images | Videos | Comments