The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

SHOULD WE THROW THE TERRORISTS TO A MOB IN TIME SQUARE

New York City : NY : USA | 5 days ago  
Views: 2,820
  • Trade Center Attacks Beyond Imagination
    Posted by: robertweller
  • United Pilot 93 of Denver
    United Pilot 93 of Denver
    Posted by: robertweller
    Jason Dahl of Denver was the pilot of United 93.
  • Cheney and Bush
    Cheney and Bush
    Posted by: robertweller
    The cowardly lion and the scarerow were not available.
  • STONE TO DEATH, A TRADITIONAL REGIONAL PUNISHMENT
    STONE TO DEATH, A TRADITIONAL REGIONAL PUNISHMENT
    Posted by: robertweller
    Some might, rightly or wrongly, only be satisfied with such a barbaric ...


By ROBERT WELLER

I spent several days debating with myself about what to do with the World Trade Center and Pentagon terrorists.

Let’s start here. One thing I did absorb from covering Columbine, genocide in Africa, and other atrocities, was a vow to never use the monsters’ names again, unless an editor made me. They usually did.

I am the editor here.

I also might as well get to my point now. Two wrongs do not make a right.

The terrorists who will go on trial in New York, if the trial is not moved, were tortured hundreds of times until they confessed.

What kind of heroes are these? Nelson Mandela, captured by the apartheid government of South Africa after he was betrayed by the CIA, didn’t have to be tortured. He may well have claimed responsibility for more things than he did. The African National Congress did commit some acts of terror as did the government. This isn’t Disneyland.

We will never know exactly how Jean Moulin, leader of the French resistance in World War II, died. It is known he tried to kill himself at least twice after being captured by the Nazis. All the water-boarding in the world never made him talk. He cut his own throat and even jumped off a grand balcony.

Now, our leaders, Bush and Cheney, betrayed us by using torture to gain admissions that interrogation experts said probably could have been gained by legal means. Some trials have already been dismissed in other countries.

Of course they will say they stopped further attacks. I will believe that when Judith Miller shows me some WMDs.

In some cases, people suspected of being allies of terrorists were kidnapped just to get them off the street. That was a strategical move.

It could be argued that even though our legal system would be stained forever by ignoring the doctrine that began guiding our system in 1920 _ that no evidence gained illegally could be used in a trial _ it would be worth it to rid the world of these monsters. Isn’t that like the Koran saying suicide is wrong, but then excusing it when it is convenient?

This isn’t the place to talk about what led to this situation. I learned that from Army generals. Apparently it never is. So let’s assume this essentially religious war will go on.

That means we need to consider what will happen if we put on a Roman-like show and then execute these people.

I know their excuses. I have watched their wars at close hand. They use terror because they don’t have planes and tanks.

To my way of thinking these two groups, we know who are they, should settle their own problems and not involve us. Nor should we get involved.

We could defang one side by losing our addiction to oil. My gosh, then we might find ourselves protecting the other side.

I blame religion, not any one because many do fine work, for what the world has become.

Some primatologists and existentalists believe we are born good. One must ask what happens after that to turn us, not all of us, into savages? H.L. Mencken blamed God.

I don’t know what to do. If you were to say to me gather a huge crowd in a New York stadium, strip the terrorists naked and release them I wouldn’t know what to say you. Anything we do will be wrong so perhaps we should show the world we are not lambs to be taken to the slaughter.







  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon
News Stories
 >
  • News Source: Voice of America | 5 days ago
    continues to blast the Obama administration's decision to bring five accused plotters of the September 11, 2001 terror attacks to New York for trial in a civilian court.  Democrats say the decision is appropriate and furthers American interests.
  • News Source: Virginian-Pilot Online | 5 days ago
    The former mayor of New York City, Rudy Giuliani, says putting suspected Sept. 11 terrorists on trial in New York City places residents there at unnecessary risk. Giuliani tells CNN's "State of the Union" that a more appropriate choice would be...
Videos
 >
 
Posted By ChrisBerry ChrisBerry | 4 days ago
So totally throw them to a mob lol
Posted By CaliforniaMike CaliforniaMike | 4 days ago
No, we have to give them a fair trial in open court. It is our justice system that makes us what we are, and if we reject that, the terrorists have won.
Posted By brigidprimrose brigidprimrose | 4 days ago
The heart says, "an eye for an eye so throw them to the mob and make an example out of them."
The brain says, "a just trial for all no matter what the circumstances, civilized people lead by example."
Posted By Starrywonder Starrywonder | 4 days ago
I really like what you wrote. This is all too true. We are using torture as a way of getting information. The terrorists get to kill and torture people, but then deserve a fair trial? Please explain to me why they DESERVE that when they did not go to the trouble of treating their victims properly!!!
Posted By yuyun yuyun | 4 days ago
i agree with you.. i don't like and hate terrorist too... they hurt many people...
Posted By xiii_hades xiii_hades | 4 days ago
i agree with you.
Posted By robertweller robertweller | 4 days ago
There are three reasons not to use torture.
Should we use torture? And if we do can we use the information at a trial?

1. It is illegal under our law and the Geneva convention.
2. It could subject our people to torture.
3. The information is often phony. I cannot honestly say it would never work. Yet is it the best way? What effect would it have on the people we employ to do it?

I am only one person in a nation of 300 million. We have to decide what we want to be. My late mother and I could never agree on whether we should have dropped nuclear bombs on Japan.

I have made my mind up, though I could change, but will not disclose my opinion because I will be attacked no matter which choice I make.
Posted By updegraffa updegraffa | 4 days ago
Throw him to the mob. He won't ever get a fair trial. No Jury will be fair minded. Send the monster to Israel let them try him. See how he likes it there. He will recieve the same hospitality that he has shown to others. Yeah Israel.
Posted By blackwidow351w blackwidow351w | 4 days ago
Well torture may be wrong. Though I don't think simulated water boarding is the same as the torture the nazis used so let's be realistic here. Also these terrorist were kidnapping americans in Iraq and cutting there heads off so which is truly worse. I really don't know why it's being tried in a civilian court these men committed an act of war and that should make this be done in military court. I truly believe this is being done now to distract people from the healthcare reform they are trying to cram down our throats.
Reported by robertweller
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @4625989

Most Popular Reports

Related Tweets

  • daweiner

    @daweiner http://bit.ly/1tQHqx WATCH: Arizona congressman wonders if terrorists will kidnap Bloomberg's daughter due to 9/11 trials

    3 days ago

Related People

Contributions

Help and Accounts


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.