The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

All STRAIGHT men are created equal

Palm Springs : CA : USA | about 1 month ago  
Views: 152
  • Gay marriage supporters Weiss comforts Hoopes at No on 1/Protect Maine Equality election night rally in Portland
    Gay marriage supporters Weiss comforts Hoopes at No on 1/Protect Maine ...
    Source: Reuters
  • Gay marriage supporters wait for election results at No on 1/Protect Maine Equality election night rally in Portland
    Gay marriage supporters wait for election results at No on 1/Protect ...
    Source: Reuters
Gay marriage supporters Weiss comforts Hoopes at No on 1/Protect Maine ...

…all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. – That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just power from the consent of the governed, -- That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Well isn’t that nice.

Mind you, the Declaration of Independence was written before Blacks were freed from their chains, before women were freed from their kitchens, and before Gays were freed from religion.

And it’s only been in the last 100 years that the descendents of the aforementioned Blacks could go to the same schools, drink from the same fountains, eat in the same restaurants as their oppressors. Only in the last 100 years that women could wear pants without being called whores, that they could vote for who and what they wanted, and that they had the right to choose.

And as of November 4th, 2009, Gays and Lesbians still can’t get married. In fact, they can only get married in 10% of the United States. All men are created equal, huh?

One year after California of all places passes the law to ban gay marriage in its state, Maine does the same today with 53% of votes for the ban resulting in only 8% of the United States performing gay marriages. However, as of January 1st, 2010 it will be back to 10%. Thank you, New Hampshire.

Luckily, it is still the Right of the People to alter or to abolish [suppressive laws which] seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. I predict in the next 50 years, this prejudice will not even be an issue anymore. Every year, a generation of mostly conservatives becomes smaller as a generation of mostly liberals turns 18.

Someday soon all men will be created equal.

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon

Related Allvoices Contributions

News Stories
 
  • News Source: The Boston Globe | about 1 month ago
    N.H.— A New Hampshire state police officials hopes that a new cold-case homicide unit will start coming results by the end of its first year. The final step in creating the unit came this week when the Executive Council accepted nearly $700,000 in...
  • News Source: Alternet | about 1 month ago
    on November 6, 2009. After losses like the one in Maine, I always feel like the best way to channel anger is into the next fight. Share and save this post:                      AlterNet Social Networks: After losses like the...
  • News Source: San Francisco Chronicle | about 1 month ago
    Fear and homophobia, sadness and confusion have come 'round once more, chalked up yet another little victory, this time in the twee state of Maine, where the trees are exceedingly lovely this time of year, the seafood is world-famous and the people...
  • News Source: San Francisco Chronicle | about 1 month ago
    Same sex marriage advocates in Maine seemed to have the elements in place for victory Tuesday. On Wednesday, supporters who want to put the issue back on the ballot in California learned a big lesson from their defeat: Advocates have not convinced...
  • News Source: The New York Times | about 1 month ago
    Maine, with its libertarian leanings, had seemed to offer an excellent chance of reversing the national trend of voters rejecting marriage equality at the ballot box. Instead, it became the 31st state to block same-sex marriage through a public...
  • News Source: Washington Post | about 1 month ago
    Just over half the voters there repealed a state law that would have allowed same-sex couples to wed, a statute passed by the legislature in May and signed by Gov. John E...Gay rights advocates had been optimistic about the Maine referendum, having...
Blogs
 >
  • Blog Source: blog.q-notes.com
    The organization she works with was formed in 1977 when gays and lesbians first began to come out of the closet and ask for equal rights. Back then, homosexuals were denied custody of their children in divorce actions; were not permitted to ... We
  • Blog Source: www.thepeoplesvoice.org
    If Question 1 passes, Maine -- like California -- will have legislated inequality. In a nation founded on the principle that all men are created equal, the law will now say that gays and lesbians are not so equal. ...
  • Blog Source: dagblog.com
    “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. ... Don't Ask, Don't Tell ( DADT) is
  • Blog Source: www.huffingtonpost.com
    Last year, Focus on the Family donated nearly $450000 to support a California proposition outlawing gay marriage. This year, the Colorado Springs-based organization is setting. .... Michael Crawford: DC Marriage Bill Introduced: What's Next . A new
  • Blog Source: www.autostraddle.com
    The margin was much slimmer this year than it was in California. We have a serious disadvantage b/c there aren't that many gay people in this country, or in the world even. Somewhere between .5% and 4% of the US Population identifies as ..... Kevin's
  • Blog Source: brodylevesque.blogspot.com
    Throughout the course of the oft times bitter campaign, supports and LGBT Equality Rights organisations had banked on Maine's reputation as a "live and let live" state with special emphasis that Gay people deserved equal protection and .... The Blend
Images
 >
 
Videos
 >
 
  • Posted By antonianoel antonianoel | about 1 month ago
    Please rate this article. If you enjoyed this article, please become a fan and feel free to look at my other articles as well.
  • Posted By Redhanded101 Redhanded101 | about 1 month ago
    antonia,

    Does the voice of the people matter anymore? Each time the question of whether Gay Marriage should be allowed is put up for a vote from the public, it has failed. Does this mean anything to anyone?

    Can the people of this country stand for what is universally accepted as the traditional family unit without anyone throwing a fit?

    Gay Marriage will never be mainstream in this country because the majority of the people in this country hold traditional family and moral values. This is the bedrock of the American Family.

    Don't get me wrong, I am not against Gay people. I just think Gay marriage is too extreme.
  • Reply By firesisle firesisle | about 1 month ago
    Red,
    I'm a major fan of your articles and your political perspectives, but in this case I must disagree.

    When it comes to the establishment and protection of the rights of an individual in a free society, the will of the people is irrelevant. The will of the people was clearly not in favor of desegregation, nor was it necessarily concurrent with the other examples cited by the author.

    What is universally accepted is equally irrelevant to the question at hand. People have the right to stand for and embrace whatever values they wish, in the context of their own lives. When they become oppressive to others by impressing those values unilaterally, they spit on everything the Constitution stands for. Doing what's right isn't always the same thing as doing what's comfortable... to anybody.

    Individual rights are not predicated, nor dependent upon the will of the people, but by the Constitution; when the tyranny of the majority is allowed to usurp those rights, something is very wrong indeed.

    Marriage is an institution which is built on a sacred bond between two people, and as such, more sacred to individuals than to society as a whole because societies don't get married.

    When I was a child in Alabama, a person of color sitting in the front of the buss was considered too extreme; that they might wish to be extended the same rights and privileges guaranteed to all by the Constitution was seen as too extreme; that two people of diverse ethnicity might wish to enter into a state of matrimony was seen as both extreme, and immoral.

    There is no more sacred, or moral value than the protection of the rights of the individual; it's what this country was founded on. The bedrock of the American family is based on love, devotion, acceptance, unity, and strength, and these traits are not gender specific.
  • Reply By antonianoel antonianoel | about 1 month ago
    Well said, on all points. But I especially loved, "Marriage is an institution which is built on a sacred bond between two people, and as such, more sacred to individuals than to society as a whole because societies don't get married."
  • Reply By antonianoel antonianoel | about 1 month ago
    Of course gay marriage will someday be mainstream in this country. They said it would never be "mainstream" for black people or women to have equal rights as well and look at us now.

    To quote my article, "Every year, a generation of mostly conservatives becomes smaller as a generation of mostly liberals turns 18."
  • Reply By firesisle firesisle | about 1 month ago
    The flaw in your assertion is that most of those who are liberals at 18 will be conservatives at 30; age strips us of our idealism in favor of a pragmatic abstraction based upon our real life experience. Unfortunately, the gay marriage issue isn't as simple as liberal/conservative issues; I've known a number of very liberal homophobes.

    As a conservative, and a Constitutional literalist, I am an avid supporter of gay rights initiatives in general and gay marriage in particular. No loving couple should be denied that right, and in reality, within the scope of the constitutional republic in which we live, are absolutely guaranteed that right.
  • Reply By antonianoel antonianoel | about 1 month ago
    I don't often hear of liberals turned conservatives. I am basing my logic on the fact that there's significantly more "liberals" as we know it now than ever before. After all, conservatives used to be considered liberal when the United States was formed.
  • Posted By stillthinking stillthinking | about 1 month ago
    Redhanded, what negative effects do you actually see gay marriage having?

    You make it sound like the day gay marriage comes into effect are people going to say "Hey, well screw it, gays can marry too. I might as well just find a hooker and cheat on my wife"

    To me the anti gay marriage stance looks like the last vestiges of a 2000 year old history of discrimination against homosexuals by people from europe and the middle east. (the ancient empires didn't care, neither did much of the rest of the world)

    This attitude has since been largely abandoned in the US and Europe. 50 years ago being gay was illegal. 20 years ago, some people were shocked to see a same sex couple in public or on tv. Now some people (the majority in some states) want to make gay marriage illegal. It's the tail end of a dying trend.

    "I have nothing against gays but i wouldn't want them to marry"

    sounds alot like

    "I have nothing against blacks, but i wouldn't want one marrying my daughter"
  • Reply By antonianoel antonianoel | about 1 month ago
    (( "I have nothing against gays but i wouldn't want them to marry"

    sounds alot like

    "I have nothing against blacks, but i wouldn't want one marrying my daughter" ))

    Actually, Blacks weren't allowed to marry either until the last century. I forgot what year it was made legal.
  • Posted By JonathanAquino JonathanAquino | about 1 month ago
    I wonder why there's no such thing as "Straight Guys Pride March..."
  • Reply By antonianoel antonianoel | about 1 month ago
    For the same reason there is no "white pride" month. Straight people aren't a minority.
  • Posted By ahol888 ahol888 | about 1 month ago
    Cool counterpoint, antonia. In the original draft of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson had put in there for slavery to be abolished, but he was too much of a wuss to keep it in the document. The thing with same-sex marriage is that gays do not want this to make a civil rights statement; they want the tax breaks.
  • Reply By firesisle firesisle | about 1 month ago
    The reason that he was "too much of a wuss to keep it in the document" was that for all his antislavery rhetoric, he was an active slave holder until the day he died.

    Gays are entitled to it regardless of their motivations, and as such the denial of that entitlement is necessarily a civil rights issue. You do understand that gays form loving relationships in the same way that heterosexual couples to, correct?

    We extend, by law, certain rights and privileges to heterosexual couples, in some cases even those couples who aren't married, but legally cohabiting; there is no "common law" marriage for gays. They are denied access to their partner in an emergency room, even when that person is dying because they're not "immediate family". Think for a minute; how would that make you feel?
  • Reply By antonianoel antonianoel | about 1 month ago
    By the way, thank you for the respectful comment.
  • Reply By antonianoel antonianoel | about 1 month ago
    Are you certain that gays ONLY wants this for the tax breaks? That's a little ignorant to say, don't you think?

    I know many gay people who say they themselves wouldn't get married but they believe it should be allowed.

    But if the tables were turned, and gay people could get married and gay people were preventing straight people from getting married, wouldn't you feel oppressed? Would you really want to get married JUST for the sake of tax breaks? Come on... really?

    I, myself--a straight woman--am not getting married. My man and I made that decision together. We certainly understand the benefits of marriage. But as far as our personal beliefs are concerned, we feel better knowing that we can stay together for the rest of our lives without being bound by a contract. Without being forced to stay together like a lot of married couples are because divorce would be too much of a hassle for them. We actually WANT to be together.
  • Posted By Ibrahim_mahmood Ibrahim_mahmood | about 1 month ago
    I agree to your point of view Antonia, when we say that all men should be allowed to exercise their right for freedom in relition and beliefs it should include rights for gays and lesbians...i can relate this to our part of the world where people discriminate left, right and centre in the name of religion !!
  • Reply By antonianoel antonianoel | about 1 month ago
    Thank you for your comment. It is a shame that more countries in the world couldn't be more open minded to civil rights. It seems as though when we move towards accepting one group of people, a new one pops up that the world wants to discriminate against. It's sad, and though I don't think discrimination will ever be abolished completely, I only hope that the people of our world continue to grow and accept each other for we are all on this planet together. We must think of the children. No one wants our children hated; why would anyone condone letting our children hate each other?
  • Reply By firesisle firesisle | about 1 month ago
    I couldn't agree more. Nancy Griffith says it very well:
    "It's a hard life, it's a hard life, it's a hard life wherever you go;
    And if we poison our children with hatred, then the hard life is all that they'll know;
  • Reported by antonia noel
    Report Your News Got a similar story?
    Add it to the network!

    Or add related content to this report

    Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @4552151

    Most Popular Reports

    Related Tweets

    Related Allvoices Reports

    Related People

    Contributions

    Help and Accounts


    Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

    © Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.