The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

Going Rogue?

Anchorage : AK : USA | 28 days ago  
Views: 1,787
  • Sarah Palin, Going Rogue?
    Sarah Palin, Going Rogue?
    Posted by: alexandraames
    .
  • Sarah Palin
    Sarah Palin
    Source: AFP
  • Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin attends the annual CLSA Investors' Forum in Hong Kong
    Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin attends the annual CLSA Investors' ...
    Source: Reuters
  • Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin addresses the annual CLSA Investors' Forum in Hong Kong
    Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin addresses the annual CLSA Investors'...
    Source: Reuters
Sarah Palin, Going Rogue?

"Going Rogue" is more than a book title for Sarah Palin, it is her life mantra. The sweetheart of the Republican party has now tipped her hand as for the reason for the swift resignation of the Alaskan Gubernatorial office.

The Anchorage Daily News reported today Ms. Palin's financial disclosure statement that encompassed the months she served in the highest office in Alaska. During that time, HarperCollins paid an advance (her term, retainer) on the forthcoming memoir of $1.25 million.

"The Governor has complied with Alaska disclosure law by her filing," Meghan Stapleton said in an e-mail Tuesday. "Now, as a private citizen, her business dealings, including her publishing agreement, are confidential."

Does this surprise anyone? It is no shock that Palin was posturing for position within the Republican Party as she formed her plans during the 2008 failing vice-presidential run. I believe Sarah and her husband, Todd, saw the upcoming loss of the VP gig. She had a taste of the national spotlight and became drunk on power. It was impossible for her to come so close to the brass ring, only to have it yanked from her grasp.

Sarah Palin had a master plan, one that touched on all aspects of her persona:

She manipulated those closest to her, even her daughter, Bristol, and "to be, not to be" son-in-law, Levi Johnston through a near shot-gun wedding;

She "quit" on the people of Alaska who supported and elected her as she resigned the office of Governor, claiming she didn't want to be a lame duck governor;

She reworked herself on social network venues (Facebook, 950,000 fans, and Twitter) to build a base - much more of a celebrity platform than one of policy and substance;

She played a "peek-a-boo" game of agreeing to speak at events for candidates, only to withdraw at the last moment;

She recently spoke on behalf of Doug Hoffman, Congressional candidate from New York, who is not a Republican, but running on the Conservative Party ticket - the party Sarah Palin identifies with.

Are any of these things illegal? No, they are not. Do these actions speak to the moral character of an individual who, for all practical purposes has her eye on the highest position in the United States? Yes, it does.

The bottom line for former vice-presidential candidate, former Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin is GREED. She has tasted fame and fortune, she has done it while slipping under the ropes, she has done it through manipulation. "Going Rogue" is not just the title of her soon-to-be-released book, it is the story of her life.

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon

Related Allvoices Contributions

News Stories
 >
  • News Source: The Hill | 24 days ago
    Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman has said he will caucus with Republicans if he wins the special election next Tuesday, maintaining a vote against President Barack Obama's healthcare plan and the rest of the Democratic agenda. But...
  • News Source: Gawker | 24 days ago
    UK Guardian reporter Ed Pilkington went to Anchorage to interview the 19 year-old babydaddy of Tripp Palin, Levi Johnston . There's audio, and some fairly interesting insight from Johnston on the Palin family and his Vanity Fair article, which was "...
  • News Source: Truthout | 24 days ago
    William Rivers Pitt, t r u t h o u t Columnist Everyone expects to see and hear some strange stuff whenever Halloween comes around. The costumes, the parties, the old ghost stories that always make the rounds and that ever-present breed of...
  • News Source: Washington Post | 24 days ago
    Scozzafava drops out of NY-23 special election The decision by Republican Dede Scozzafava to suspend her campaign makes it a two way race between Democrat Bill Owens (left) and Conservative Doug Hoffman (middle).AP photos State Assemblywoman Dede...
  • News Source: Asian Wall Street Journal | 25 days ago
    What began as a little-noticed congressional campaign in upstate New York has become a high-profile battle for the direction of the Republican Party, and it could play a big role in the GOP's approach to the 2010 elections and beyond. With...
  • News Source: The Guardian | 25 days ago
    Now he is trading insults with her mother and about to strip off for a magazine Levi Johnston underwent a makeover before appearing alongside his then girlfriend, Bristol Palin, at the Republican National Convention. Photograph: Tannen Maury/EPA...
Blogs
 >
  • Blog Source: weblogs.baltimoresun.com
    Sarah Palin gets $1 million-plus for Going Rogue. Add Sarah Palin to the list of politicians-turned-millionaires. In a disclosure statement released today in Alaska, she reported receiving at least $1.25 million from HarperCollins for ...
  • Blog Source: weblogs.baltimoresun.com
    HarperCollins says Palin will provide "an intimate portrait of growing up in the wilds of Alaska; meeting her lifelong love; her decision to enter politics; the importance of faith and family; and the unique joys and trials of life as a ...
Images
 >
 
Videos
 >
 
Posted By Shirley66 Shirley66 | 27 days ago
One unpleasant situation that leads to another. Eventually affecting her credibility.
Reply By alexandraames alexandraames | 27 days ago
Unfortunately, it appears that Ms. Palin finds herself above the fray. Hopefully the conservatives will see through her facade...
Posted By pollard pollard | 27 days ago
If you wish to talk and write about morals and greed, why must you go all the way to Alaska? You can question anyones morals or greediness right here in Chicago.
Reply By alexandraames alexandraames | 27 days ago
You are correct, I need not go all the way to Alaska. For looking at unusual deeds, I need only look at budgetary crises in Iowa. I shall continue to comment on such situations. Thanks for stopping by, pollard!
Posted By pollard pollard | 27 days ago
Not to mention Washington, New York, Mass, California.
Posted By Redhanded101 Redhanded101 | 27 days ago
I sense that you are more upset at the fact that Sarah Palin will be earning a huge amount of money for her efforts after leaving the political world.

This is sour grapes.

Barack Obama did exactly the same things you attribute to Palin. He wrote a couple of books, and used his seat in the Senate to build & promote his personal agenda. He used his church and Reverend Wright to build his street cred, and then he left he abandoned his Senate seat after only a year and a half to pursue personal glory. Sound familiar?

I felt that she left Alaska in better condition then when she got it.I think that the Liberal Media's constant pursuit of disinformation took away from her ability to serve the people of Alaska. It was not fair for the people of Alaska to have a sitting Governor constantly trying to defend herself from the many frivolous claims brought on by her detractors. All of which turned out to be false.

She will be an asset to other Republicans & Conservatives and will be raise a lot of money for many candidates in upcoming elections. Barack Obama is still out there campaigning, why can't Palin?

I think you were a bit unfair and I think a lot of it has to do with jealousy.
Posted By alexandraames alexandraames | 27 days ago
Redhanded, thanks for your input. I will however totally disagree with you. I do not begrudge Ms. Palin the money she will receive from her book deal. The problem is much deeper. She has been manipulating those around her from the beginning, and I believe she will continue. She states one thing, then does another. She claims to have high regard for the people of Alaska, and then runs roughshod over them, leaving them without fulfilling the term she campaigned for and accepted.

Sarah Palin will not be an asset to the Republican Party - in fact, with her aligning with the "Conservative Party" she is drawing recognition and notarity to an up and coming third party that will weaken the Republican Party similar to the Ross Perot scenario.

Am I jealous? Not at all. Am I concerned for my country and the political system? Absolutely!
Reply By Redhanded101 Redhanded101 | 27 days ago
Alexandra,

I just can't reconcile your argument that she left her Governorship without having fulfilled her term without you telling me why is it ok for a Presdiential candidate to have put in only 150 working days as a Senator in a six year, to run for President.And mind you, most of those days he served were spent writing two books. So my question to you is, why is this acceptable?
Reply By alexandraames alexandraames | 27 days ago
Redhanded, what do any of us know of the schedules and dealings of those we have elected? If we knew actually the hours worked (both the incredibly large AND small) would be find it "acceptable"? A Senator has responsibilities of voting and reseaching and representing his/her constiuents while a Governor has the day-to-day management of an entire state.

Palin is the one who made it clear her first priority was to the good citizens of Alaska - why then would she simply walk away?
Posted By Tyler12 Tyler12 | 27 days ago
She does stay in front of the media for better or worse.
Reply By alexandraames alexandraames | 27 days ago
Yes, she absolutely does stay in the media.
Posted By ACRScout ACRScout | 27 days ago
Another comical diatribe pretending to know the "backstory" when in fact it is mere guess work. But liberals live on innuendo and falsehood. Palin manipulated all around her? But just a few weeks ago the left had her painted as totally incompetent and inept but now she is the master strategist? Get real.

Several month ago the liberals were pronouncing her "politically dead" but for some reason they cannot stop attacking her. If she dead why do they continue to flog the "dead horse". The untold side of this is that the liberals are scared to death of Sarah Palin, which is why they simply cannot leave her alone. As for the idea that she "quit" on the people of Alaska, my friends and relatives who live there disagree, after countless lawsuits and ethics charges, none founded, she decided to move over and allow her Lt Gov. to take over as he would be less likely to be hounded by the partisan left and better able to serve the people, a quality of a good leader.
Reply By alexandraames alexandraames | 27 days ago
Just as in any good story, there are people on both sides of the fence. You tell me that your "friends and relatives who live there disagree" and mine tell me another story. Also, in following the Anchorage Daily News, there comes a more full story in the daily dealings of Alaska politics.

I find it extremely interesting that those who are attempting to say the "liberals" are flogging a dead horse have done nonetheless to past candidates and political situations when it suited their fancy.

Sarah Palin will have her 15 minutes of fame - and she will take portions of the Republican Party with her in a fireball. For now, it is a good lesson for all future politicians to take note...watch that many will be tracking your motives and ideals.
Reply By ACRScout ACRScout | 27 days ago
All else aside, the question still remains, why do the liberals feel the need to attack a person that they have repeatedly pronounced "dead". Do they still fear her politically or do they merely have a sadistic streak that needs to be stroked.
Reply By ACRScout ACRScout | 27 days ago
All else aside, the question still remains, why do the liberals feel the need to attack a person that they have repeatedly pronounced "dead". Do they still fear her politically or do they merely have a sadistic streak that needs to be stroked.
Posted By pollard pollard | 27 days ago
The best way to get free name recognition is through the press, Bad or good. That seems like a pretty smart move to me. Let the leftist media help get your name out. Most pollsters last year who did exit interviews in mostly democratic polling stations, 90% of the voters interviewed couldn't even think of her name. What does that tell you.

From all the bashing she takes on this site, it must be working.
Posted By Ridicules Ridicules | 27 days ago
Um..she's a bright one. :3
Posted By BorderExplorer BorderExplorer | 27 days ago
from http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/polltracker/2009/10/palin.html:

"Sarah Palin may be rich, thanks to her book deal, but she's not popular, according to an NBC-Wall Street Journal poll conducted Oct. 22-25 and a CNN poll conducted Oct. 16-18.

CNN's poll found that a whopping seven in 10 Americans surveyed don't think that the Republican Party's 2008 vice presidential nominee is qualified to be president.

The NBC-Wall Street Journal poll tracks Palin's general popularity, and found that at a new low, with 11 percent of those surveyed having very positive feelings toward her and another 16 percent having somewhat positive feelings about her. Last October, polling registered voters, Palin's numbers were much higher -- 26 percent very favorable and 18 percent somewhat favorable."
Posted By pollard pollard | 27 days ago
Well Border,
who cares what 7 of 10 cnn viewers say, considering 7 were liberals and the others were moderates. She is popular among her on party.
If you want to measure a republicans popularity go to FOX. If you want to measure a liberals popularity go to CNN or MSNBC.
Reply By alexandraames alexandraames | 26 days ago
Fortunately, one of the most believable polls happened last November...and whichever politicians choose to put themselves out there again, that polling will speak again.

Personally, I listen to all avenues (Fox, CNN, MSNBC) and attempt to grasp the bigger picture. Everytime one is labeled it closes minds. Unfortuantely, some of the politicians just want to straddle the labels and be everything... The mid-term elections should be entertaining if not informative.
Reply By BorderExplorer BorderExplorer | 27 days ago
And the Wall Street Journal?
Reply By alexandraames alexandraames | 26 days ago
Oh Border! The Wall Street Journal? What bias! (note the sarcasm in my comment...not to be taken literally!)
Reply By BorderExplorer BorderExplorer | 27 days ago
And the Wall Street Journal?
Posted By pollard pollard | 27 days ago
ACRScout,
I swear, I believe they really do have a sadist streak that needs stroking!
Reply By alexandraames alexandraames | 26 days ago
"They" meaning liberals? It is interesting how "us" and "them" change meanings depending on the political landscape. Not long ago, the Republicans were doing the same things to former President Clinton. Times change, but attitudes remain.

Thanks for stopping by!
Reply By ACRScout ACRScout | 27 days ago
That was my first choice too.
Posted By pollard pollard | 26 days ago
Unless they poll 350 million, I really don't thing 1500 should speak for the masses.
Reply By BorderExplorer BorderExplorer | 26 days ago
But if FOX polls conservatives and CNN or MSNBC polls liberals, you'd believe those results...do I understand you correctly?
Reply By alexandraames alexandraames | 26 days ago
At least there are enough media pundits and venues to satisfy all beliefs. I like to hear what those who do not think like me are saying...makes me think (even when I disagree with them!)
Posted By pollard pollard | 26 days ago
Who me? your the one that was backing up a statement with poll numbers as if you believed them. Do I understand your statements correctly?

Sarah Palin may be rich, thanks to her book deal, but she's not popular, according to an NBC-Wall Street Journal poll conducted Oct. 22-25 and a CNN poll conducted Oct. 16-18.

That sure sounds to me like you've made up your mind based on what CNN and MSNBC say's. I'm not big on a minuscule amounts of the populace dictating public opinion or for that matter legislation.


Alex, how true, times have changed and your attitudes are still the same
Reply By BorderExplorer BorderExplorer | 26 days ago
pollard, had you read the *entire* comment, you would have seen this:

"The NBC-Wall Street Journal poll tracks Palin's general popularity, and found that at a new low, with 11 percent of those surveyed having very positive feelings toward her and another 16 percent having somewhat positive feelings about her. Last October, polling registered voters, Palin's numbers were much higher -- 26 percent very favorable and 18 percent somewhat favorable."

Or, if you don't like the data, simply discredit the source (if that is your preferred MO). As for me, I'll accept the results of polls conducted by four major mainstream media sources over one person's unsubstantiated declaration that "She is popular among her on (sic) party."
Reply By alexandraames alexandraames | 26 days ago
Pollard, even Fox News is not firmly supporting of what Ms. Palin has said and done...take the Doug Hoffman race for the House seat in upstate New York against the firmly entrenched Republican candidate, Republican State Assemblywoman Dede Scozzafava.

I am not twisting data - I still maintain polls are fluid - it is the voters that will have their say. I am just evaluating the information available. That information tells my gut to watch Palin - that's all...
Reply By ACRScout ACRScout | 26 days ago
alexandra,

Like many liberals, you are confused.

There is a vast difference between a "Republican" and a "Conservative". Palin endorsed the "Conservative" (party immaterial) vs the "Republican" who has proven by her record that she is a raving liberal(aka "RINO").
Posted By alexandraames alexandraames | 26 days ago
I am far from confused, ACRScout. Yes, there is a vast difference in what is described as a Republican and a Conservative in this discussion. The Conservative that is being described by Doug Hoffman aligns much closer to Sarah Palin's ideals of the successionists in the Alaskan political scene.

Palin claims "blurring of the lines" as the reason for supporting Doug Hoffman over Scozzafava invoking (roughly) the thoughts of Ronald Reagan. All that is happening in the NY Race is a splitting of the vote that will weaken the representation of the district.
Posted By ACRScout ACRScout | 26 days ago
Oh but you are confused since you stated "...take the Doug Hoffman race for the House seat in upstate New York against the firmly entrenched Republican candidate, Republican State Assemblywoman Dede Scozzafava." As if a vote for Hoffman would be against conservative principles, since Scozzafava was the "entrenched Republican". Entrenched or not, Republican or not, Scozzafava is a liberal and therefore not acceptable to Conservatives as a valid Representative. As for Palin and the secessionists, again you are confused, as she has never been a member of the organizations in Alaska that espouse that idea, her husband was, not Gov. Palin. As I had to remind many in the Army during my military days, when they tried to "volunteer" my wife to take part in Dress Formal Balls, and other functions. "I was the one who enlisted, not my wife, she will participate if she so desires, but no one else will force her to participate. The same goes for the Governor and her husband.
Posted By pollard pollard | 26 days ago
HELLO, BORDER, I prefer to use my on thoughts as a freethinker instead of relying on DATA from a poll. What, because a handful say it, you take it as fact and why would I feel a need to discredit something I don't consider legit.
They can and are manipulated to suit your every need.
Posted By ACRScout ACRScout | 26 days ago
As Samuel Clemmons once said

"There are lies, there are damned lies, and then there are STATISTICS!"
Posted By ACRScout ACRScout | 26 days ago
As Samuel Clemmons once said

"There are lies, there are damned lies, and then there are STATISTICS!"
Reply By BorderExplorer BorderExplorer | 26 days ago
If the choice is someone's unsubstantiated "freethinking" or a scientifically conducted poll sponsored by a mainstream media source, I know which way I will go, ACRScout. You can suit yourself.
Reply By ACRScout ACRScout | 26 days ago
Considering the fact that polls have a tendency to be about as accurate as weather forecasting, like the moderate cooling predicted just before our ice storm last year, I don't put much faith in "scientific polls" since for the most part they are rarely scientific and typically partisan motivated.
Posted By pollard pollard | 26 days ago
border,see how your not for thinking on your own? Then you better stick with polls. Scientific polls at that.
Reply By BorderExplorer BorderExplorer | 26 days ago
pollard, if I'm interested in knowing how a particular person is regarded, and the choice is to consider the results of a poll or to believe what one "freethinking" person says (although that person offers no proof of what s/he says) I will choose the poll. Yes, polls can be wrong. But so can "freethinkers."

If you choose to go with the "freethinker," you certainly may.
Posted By pollard pollard | 26 days ago
border,
Finally, Check and Check Mate
Reported by alexandraames
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @4501874

Most Popular Reports

Related Tweets

  • JoeNBC

    @JoeNBC @jerzegrl Oh no! I take it you are a fan of Jon's. What a race that's going to be. Close until the end.

    25 days ago
  • PElliottAP

    @PElliottAP Palin looking for $100k to make Iowa speech. Seems nontraditional -- perhaps even Rogue -- for the first-in-the-nation caucus state, no?

    26 days ago
  • CharlesMBlow

    @CharlesMBlow Politico: "Levi [Johnston]: 'Now its my turn'". Note to Levi: Sit down! It's not going to happen. Stop chasing fame. It's disgusting.

    27 days ago

Related Allvoices Reports

Related People

Contributions

Help and Accounts


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.