The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

Casualties in Afghanistan Pile Up as Obama Ponders Politics of Decision of Adding Troops

Chicago : IL : USA | about 1 month ago  
Views: 2,837

October is turning out to be one of the deadliest months for American troops since the war began. And despite having a formal recommendation for an additional 40,000 troops from General McChrystal on his desk since August 30th, President Obama seems intent on putting off a decision until a more politically opportune time.

It’s no secret that President Obama doesn’t make a single decision without calculating the political impact or fallout from his decisions. In the case of Afghanistan, the president is no doubt reticent to announce a huge increase in troop deployments in the middle of a contentious debate over his coveted health care reform legislation. That kind of decision would infuriate the liberal base of the Democrat party at a time when he is in desperate need of their support on health care reform.

President Obama has attempted to assign the reason for his delay in his decision on additional troops on the dispute election results over the Afghanistan presidency. But it is clear that even with a runoff election on November 7th, Harmid Karzai will most probably be re-elected to his office, so that line of reasoning doesn’t hold together.

As Commander-in-Chief, Barack Obama has to put the secure of the troops and the nation above any domestic political considerations. It is not becoming of the presidency for President Obama to be indecisive and politically calculating about such an important decision as troops are sacrificing their lives on the battlefield in Afghanistan.

President Obama needs to make a decision on General McChrystal’s request and stop playing politics with the lives of our noble soldiers.

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon

Related Allvoices Contributions

News Stories
 
  • Submitted By: PeterPeng210 | about 1 month ago
    U.S. is up the ante for India on India’s gambling table in Asia. On Oct. 23, 2009, Boeing announced that Boeing is seeking to sell Apache Longbow and CH-47F Chinook helicopters to India. Vivek Lall, vice president and India country head for ...
  • News Source: Kansas City Star | about 1 month ago
    The option would preserve the general's goals of protecting Afghan cities and key infrastructure but use fewer troops to do it.

    McChrystal wants about 40,000 additional troops, atop a U.S. force of 68,000, officials have told The Associated...

  • News Source: Los Angeles Times | about 1 month ago
    Eight U.S. troops were killed today in multiple bombings in southern Afghanistan, the military said, making October the deadliest month for Americans of the eight-year war. The latest deaths bring the number of U.S. service members killed during the...
  • News Source: Times Online | about 1 month ago
    Officials said that several soldiers were injured in “multiple, complex” bomb attacks in southern Afghanistan, just a day after 14 Americans were killed in two separate helicopter crashes in the south and west of the country. An Afghan civilian...
  • News Source: Inter Press Service | about 1 month ago
    U.S. military leaders and Pentagon officials have made it clear through public statements and deliberately leaked stories in recent weeks that they plan to violate a central provision of the U.S.-Iraq withdrawal agreement requiring the complete...
  • News Source: Australian Broadcasting Corporation | about 1 month ago
    Several US soldiers were also wounded in the bomb attacks, just a day after 11 died in separate helicopter crashes. The mounting violence comes at a time when US President Barack Obama is weighing up his options on whether to send additional troops...
Blogs
 >
  • Blog Source: voices.kansascity.com
    Critics are salivating as he ponders. Former Vice President Dick Cheney accused Obama of “dithering.” More likely, he's being careful, a virtue too long absent from U.S. policy toward Afghanistan. I hope his deliberations lead him to ...
  • Blog Source: noliesradio.org
    Meanwhile, as President Obama ponders sending more troops to Afghanistan, and anxiety and anticipation are building up over the run-off, a recently released UN report says that Afghanistan produces 92% of the world's opium. ...
  • Blog Source: vitalsignsblog.blogspot.com
    That is exactly the combination we now see under President Obama. If anything, his receiving the Nobel Peace Prize only underlines the problem. All of Obama's campaign and inaugural talk about "extending an open hand" and "engagement," ...
  • Blog Source: www.pensitoreview.com
    Trish Ponder | October 26, 2009. When the nation's largest solar electric generating plant goes online outside a small, sun-baked Florida town this week, Pres. Barack Obama will be there to herald the dawn of a new era of energy production. ...
Videos
 >
 
  • Posted By firesisle firesisle | about 1 month ago
    *FLASH BACK 40 YEARS**

    Casualties in Vietnam Pile Up as Johnson Ponders Politics of Decision of Adding Troops

    Look familiar?

    Afghanistan is now Obama's war whether he likes it or not.
  • Posted By DekeBro DekeBro | about 1 month ago
    This war was, is and will forever be a Bush Cheney mess up.

    This skewed article states "But it is clear that even with a runoff election on November 7th, Harmid Karzai will most probably be re-elected to his office, so that line of reasoning doesn’t hold together." How is this clear when Karzai himself admits he didn't receive a majority vote in the last election?

    We do not need to send anymore troops to this troubled area. We need to bring them all home. How Bush/Cheney got us into taking sides in a civil war is beyond me...

    By the way. Where the hell were CitizensForHonestGovernment for the last 8 years?
  • Reply By amalgam80 amalgam80 | about 1 month ago
    "By the way. Where the hell were CitizensForHonestGovernment for the last 8 years?"

    Backing the Iraq war instead of the Afghan War is my guess.
  • Posted By CitizensForHonestGovernment CitizensForHonestGovernment | about 1 month ago
    Karzai received a majority of the votes against thousands of candidates, but didn't get the required 50%. Against just one candidate he will surely win (even the Obama administration acknowledges that).

    This is a war to prevent Al Qaeda from re-establishing a base of operation in Afghanistan and prevent the Taliban from going back to their primitive practice of subordinating/dehumanizing Afghan women and children.

    Bringing our troops home and sticking our collective heads in the sand (like we did before 911) will not make the problem go away. Our soldiers in Afghanistan know that better than anyone.

    Let our troops finish the job.
  • Reply By amalgam80 amalgam80 | about 1 month ago
    The taliban has come out repeatedly and stated that they would not let Al Qaeda run operations and harbor them as they did prior to the U.S. Invasion.

    There was an article in Newsweek about a month ago titled "Taliban: In their Own Words". I'm sure you can look it up online.

    The Taliban blames Al Qaeda for bringing the Americans into Afghanistan and then running away to Pakistan.


    And this whole argument about protecting their women is BS. No one here gives a crap about women in Afghanistan, if we did it wouldn't be Karzai that we were backing. We for sure don't care about Afghan women over our own men and women.

    The job is done. Al Qaeda is practically non-existent in Afghanistan.

    What needs to be done is start up that assassination program Cheney was trying to set up. And just kill the rest of Al Qaeda in Pakistan and get the hell out of the region before it swallows us.

    Here's another Vietnam comparison. Remember how we the VietCong went into Laos, the Al Qaeda is in Pakistan.

    We need the money in our nation. And pretty soon we might need the troops in Iran.

    If we are in AFghanistan another 2 years, things will still be the same. These people rather die than be governed by AMericans.

    They don't want to hear, we're here to save your women (yes the same ones we are bombing). They don't want to hear, we've come to spread democracy (they choose the kind of democracy they wanted, they elected the taliban.

    These people have different priorities than us, they know their land and history better than we do and they can fight for a hundred years trying to get rid of the invaders (us and NATO).

    There is no winning this War. Bring back the troops asap.

    Which just isn't going to happen because of politics. Obama has already come out and called this war the war of necessity. He's not planning on leaving anytime soon. He campaigned on this war. That means more troops and more dead troops on the way.

    The strategy is almost done as far as planning goes. Rumor has it he will announce it after the run-off.

    They already conducted war games based on two different strategies. One with 44,000 added troops and one with about 14,000 troops (not sure about the 14,000 number, it might be smaller).

    The U.S. is going to send in more troops no matter what. And the U.S. will be in Afghanistan for at least another two years, no matter what.
  • Posted By Lima_Echo_India_Foxtrot Lima_Echo_India_Foxtrot | about 1 month ago
    How should we look at it? It's expensive? It's inhumane? Our enemy moved to Pakistan? Thou shall not kill? There's no winning or losing this war? We don't have the right to police the world? Biden is against it? Pick one.

    Total futility.
  • Posted By sdolnik07 sdolnik07 | about 1 month ago
    hmmm interesting... lots of those kinds of stories on here
  • Posted By EliasRamos EliasRamos | about 1 month ago
    It's interesting that the whole topic of why we are invading a country in the first place, which was a popular media article not so long ago, has been swept under the rug. Hear-say and assumption have somehow removed the necessity of truth.
  • Posted By Shirley66 Shirley66 | about 1 month ago
    I can not help but to agree with your statement.
  • Posted By SherminKabeer676 SherminKabeer676 | about 1 month ago
    im new to this site.but i agree.
  • Reported by CitizensForHonestGovernment
    Report Your News Got a similar story?
    Add it to the network!

    Or add related content to this report

    Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @4499669

    Most Popular Reports

    Related Tweets

    Related Allvoices Reports

    Related People

    Contributions

    Help and Accounts


    Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

    © Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.