The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

Trumped up corruption charges in Turks and Caicos cause government to collapse

By: TCIwatch send a private message
Cockburn Harbour : Turks and Caicos Islands | about 1 month ago  
Views: 136
  • Michael Misick
    Michael Misick
    Posted by: TCIwatch
    Former Premier of Turks and Caicos
Michael Misick

Michael Misick, the former premier of Turks and Caicos Islands, has been recently cleared of two of the several criminal charges against him, including charges of rape. Still pending are corruption charges being pursued against Misick, alleging that Misick personally financially gained from Crown land sales to foreign developers during his term.

Also in the hot seat are the several resort developers who stand accused of related corruption charges for allegedly bribing Misick and other public officials for favorable Crown land deals.

To say that developers bribed public officials pushes boundaries of decency and gross misinformation. All signs and evidence point to the same truth, that there was no bribery.

First there is the assertion that developers seeking crown land bribed public officials for favorable treatment. Let's explore the Crown land bribery claim.

In fact these developers were shamelessly wooed by Misick and his administration to invest in Turks and Caicos. Whether or not anyone personally agrees with Michael Misick and his personal life, most all can agree that he is a master salesman and promoter, particularly in real estate. His career outside of politics has continuously been real estate and real estate investments.

Misick spent an extraordinary amount of focus in bringing in high-end foreign developers to invest in Turks and Caicos. Misick's foreign investment recruitment alone and promotion thereof, shows Misick's genius.

It is no secret that Misick used his Hollywood connections through his actress wife Lisa-Ray, to rub elbows with the Hollywood elite which he admits gave him credibility with high-end foreign resort developers. And bring the celebrities Misick did.

A huge development and celebrity boom in the islands was enjoyed by Turks and Caicos during Misick's administration. Turks and Caicos went from being a little known scuba enthusiast holiday destination to a playground for the rich and famous. Misick takes credit for the economic boom, development, investments and publicity of the islands.

Upon UK's investigation of purported wrong-doing by Misick, it was stated at the time of Misick's resignation that his Hollywood lifestyle was necessary and

"... allowed him to court high-end developers and helped put the British territory on the mape he took office, the gross domestic product in the territory of 22,000 people has more than doubled to $750 million — largely through a resort-building boom."

This is proof positive that Misick was the one who went after resort developers, not the other way around. What's more is that resort developers were given many incentives to invest in Turks and Caicos, including Belongership status which allowed them to purchase Crown land and other inducements that included speedy infrastructure permits.

Second there is the misnomer that Crown land is for use for Belongers alone. According to the Crown Land Policy, commercial land development is one of the main purposes of Crown land use and sale. The Crown Land Policy is formulated to "attract investments judged best for the interest of TCI [Turks and Caicos Islands]."

Crown land is specifically intentioned for businesses and development, according to Turks and Caicos' policies. In fact according to the law in Turks and Caicos, "There are no restrictions on foreign investment and the government has a very successful open-arms inward investment policy."

Why resort developers are being caught in the fray of the unsubstantiated claims of bribery should be a crime. Not only are these developers unfairly judged, the international investment community is staying far away from the foreseen entrapment of Turks and Caicos' political finger pointing.

It is well documented that resort developers did not bribe the Misick administration. If anything the Misick administration bribed them as admitted by Misick himself. The campaign contributions in questions were not bribes. How could they be? The contributions were made 3 weeks prior the election. Why would someone bribe a person who may or may not be in office in 3 weeks? It is ridiculous. It's called a campaign contribution pure and simple. Turks and Caicos is now clamoring to restore confidence in investors, create jobs and promote tourism.

Certainly Turks and Caicos' investment climate is shaky at best with several high-end resort closures. It's time to promote a renewed confidence within the international community of not only investment safety but for tourism as well.

For background on UK's direct rule, read: www://tciwatch.com http://bermudaisanotherworld.org/forum/index.php?action=printpage;topic=1021.0

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon

Related Allvoices Contributions

Posted By Jimmmy Jimmmy | about 1 month ago
Why did you take this down and then repost it? Was it something I said?
Posted By Jimmmy Jimmmy | about 1 month ago
5 - I find that the payment of $500,000 by Dr Cem Kinay, through his company,
Turks Ltd, to the Hon Michael Misick was a possibly corrupt payment because: 1) the Hon Michael Misick did not declare it in Cabinet when
Dr Kinay's proposals for development were under discussion, or to the Registrar of
Interests or to the Commission; 2) it was paid to him through a third party
account, namely the client account of his brother and attorney, Chal Misick; 3)
it was wholly disproportionate to its stated purpose, namely for political
campaigning, and was not, for the most part, spent on such campaigning; and
4) it was received from a developer who had a continuing relationship with the
Government, with whom further development agreements were under
consideration or being negotiated, and who benefited from Cabinet decisions
generous to him.

[Auld Commission, Final Report]
Posted By TCIwatch TCIwatch | about 1 month ago
Your comments only make my point. It gets better traffic on Monday. You should also allow comments on your site TCI Journal. That way when you say that everyone agrees with you, it won't be your word against everyone else's silence.
Posted By Jimmmy Jimmmy | about 1 month ago
I think comments on the TCI Journal would be an excellent idea. You should suggest it to them. You should allow them on Turks Journal too.

So how does your boss explain the points made by Auld?
Posted By TCIwatch TCIwatch | about 1 month ago
My boss you say? Well I think god and democracy are my bosses. So I will try to channel the two to humor you with a response: 1. The money was a campaign contribution made 3 weeks prior to the elections. If it were a bribe, Misick would have received the money after he was in office to be in a position to perform for bribes. There is no restriction on anonymous contributions. The money was disproportionate to the value of the land only in the sense that the land had not been inhabited for 100 years and is desolate iron terrain for which the government was trying to practically give it away. The government had begged several devlopers to get it developed and were giving away incentives.
Posted By Freedomlover Freedomlover | about 1 month ago
Dear Chris: I am not from Turks and Caicos. I am from Canada a sovreign country and pseudo-underling of the UK. Trust me, if they want to find corruption charges they will manage to find it. It has forever been UK's policy to take now and ask questions later. It is how they operate and are doing so to this date. If an action suits their political interest, they will make it happen.

It seems that you care about this cause. That is admirable. I would never want someone to stop speaking out for freedom. But what you see on the other side of the fence are people like Jimmy who are trying to defend UK's action or is at least sympathetic to it.

There is nobody in their right mind who would support UK on this unless something was it in for them. Nobody thinks like Jimmy organically - there is some artificial reason for his defensiveness. Explore that road.
Reply By Jimmmy Jimmmy | about 1 month ago
It's curious how fascinating our country is to those commentators who have registered in the last day or two. No doubt it's just a coincidence.
Reply By Jimmmy Jimmmy | about 1 month ago
Why was the money not paid directly? It was paid via his brother. There is nothing to corroborate Kinay's assertion that it was a political donation.

You misunderstand the disproportionality point. There are fewer than 10,000 voters in the entire country. You couldn't spend that sort of money on a campaign if you tried. And you can rest assured no-one tried.

ps, Kinay has been called many things, but calling him God is taking sucking up way too far.
Posted By TCIwatch TCIwatch | about 1 month ago
You just registered too Jimmy. Is that also curious?
Posted By Jimmmy Jimmmy | about 1 month ago
Not really. As you know I came to keep you company after you got busted by blogcritics.
Posted By TCIwatch TCIwatch | about 1 month ago
That's it? You're boring me Shaun. Do people actually fall asleep when you start picking apart catering bills from government Christmas parties or car allowance expenditures? Is that what Hartshorn pays you to do? Maybe we should find out how you can afford to be unemployed for years and take care of your family and baby mama. Yet your blogging against my democraticly inspired civil rights platform. Wow.
Posted By Jimmmy Jimmmy | 29 days ago
Your "democraticly [sic] inspired civil rights platform"?

Excellent. In fact Mike Misick has frequently been compared to Dr. King and Nelson Mandela. So far admittedly only by Mike Misick, but it's a start. All those private jets, multi-million dollar properties and partying with the cream of the d-list was not for himself, he did it all for us? I am truly humbled.

I take it you're not going to have a crack at telling us why Mike needed all that money for "campaigning" or why Kinay laundered it through Chal's firm?

Thought not.
Posted By TCIwatch TCIwatch | 29 days ago
Shaun-- I am offended. You didn't read my article. At least I bother to read your stuff to make an intelligible response.
Reported by TCIwatch
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @4489749

Most Popular Reports

Related Tweets

  • jaketapper

    @jaketapper "I'm not saying a new name is easy to find....But it's a label on a can." @poniewozik looks at last night's #MadMen http://bit.ly/n9o3e

    29 days ago

Contributions

Help and Accounts


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.