The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

The Very Curious Case of Mr. Gustavo De La Rosa Hickerson

El Paso : TX : USA | about 1 month ago  
Views: 5,566
  • Gustavo de la Rosa Hickerson
    Gustavo de la Rosa Hickerson
    Posted by: BorderExplorer
    credit: El Paso Times, as seen on http://www.elpasotimes.com/news/...
Gustavo de la Rosa Hickerson

Some news stories raise more questions than they answer.


Gustavo De La Rosa Hickerson, the Juarez Ombudsman for the Human Rights Commission of the State of Chihuahua, Mexico, was released October 21 from one of the Department of Homeland Security's detention facilities after six days of detention.



On October 15, while De La Rosa was about to enter the US with his US Consulate-issued laser visa, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents detained him when he answered "yes" to their question of whether he had reason to fear for his life in Mexico.

De La Rosa explained to the CBP agents that, as the Juarez Ombudsman for the Chihuahua State Human Rights Commission, his life had been threatened. He investigates accusations of human rights violations against the Mexican military. During the interview, De La Rosa clearly stated that, while he did fear for his life, he was not seeking political asylum at this time. He instead wanted to continue ongoing negotiations with Chihuahua state officials from whom he had requested security protection.

Nevertheless, CBP detained De La Rosa.

The detention raises serious questions and concerns. De La Rosa is a well known, high profile official of a governmental human rights office.

Why was De La Rosa detained?

On whose authority was De La Rosa detained?

Why was his clear declaration that he was not seeking political asylum disregarded?

If De La Rosa was detained for his own protection, more questions arise:

Why was De La Rosa placed in handcuffs and locked up in a detention facility?

Were there any political considerations involved in the decision to detain De La Rosa?

And finally: If someone of De La Rosa's public stature is treated in this manner, what treatment do non-public persons receive?

Activists say they intend to file a formal request for a Congressional Inquiry on De La Rosa's detention.

Some questions deserve answers.

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon
News Stories
 
Images
 >
 
Videos
 >
 
Posted By scott1995 scott1995 | about 1 month ago
interesting story, a lot of mistory here.
Posted By Punditty Punditty | about 1 month ago
I'd like to know the answer to the questions raised in this report, too. Thanks for this report, BorderExplorer.
Posted By darkgriever darkgriever | about 1 month ago
"And finally: If someone of De La Rosa's public stature is treated in this manner, what treatment do non-public persons receive?"

That kind of thinking is so self-defeating, it's no wonder this kind of thing still happens.
Posted By ahol888 ahol888 | about 1 month ago
There's no need to detain this guy. If I lived in Juarez, Mexico, then I would look to move too.
Posted By InspectorGadget InspectorGadget | about 1 month ago
Those are all very valid questions. With the currently available information, the story doesn't add up. Please keep us updated if more is revealed.
Posted By BorderExplorer BorderExplorer | about 1 month ago
@InspectorGadget I have an email copy of the attorneys' letter that an El Paso law firm sent to Robert E. Jolicoeur, Field Office Director, stating the facts of the case and calling for de la Rosa's release. The letter is dated October 19 and is cc'd to various governmental officials and NGO leaders as well as Amnesty International, Latin American Working Group, Los Angeles Times, New York Times, El Paso Times, and individuals at the Associated Press; the local ACLU office and National Public Radio.

Activists had planned a public demonstration for October 22 in front of the Federal Building in El Paso to call for the release of Gustavo de la Rosa Hickerson from ICE detention. As this report indicates, de la Rosa was released October 21, so the demonstration was not necessary.
Posted By ccline1024 ccline1024 | about 1 month ago
maybe he should've just said no.... being that high up he should know what to expect and if he is always afraid of his life being in danger, only answer yes if it is more so now than usual....
Posted By rouin rouin | about 1 month ago
interesting artical i wil deffinately show this to my blog
Posted By ladym33 ladym33 | about 1 month ago
Thank you for the information.
Posted By fadsare fadsare | about 1 month ago
very intersting i'm linking it on my blog
Posted By ROSBELVJ ROSBELVJ | about 1 month ago
very interesting
Posted By hasnain hasnain | about 1 month ago
best news of the day
Posted By hasnain hasnain | about 1 month ago
Best news of the day
Posted By ladym33 ladym33 | about 1 month ago
Hmm, That is certainly very curious. Looking forward to seeing what the reasons were.
Reported by Billie Greenwood
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @4471540

Most Popular Reports

Related Allvoices Reports

Contributions

Help and Accounts


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.