The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

The NFL and Politics

Boston : MA : USA | about 1 month ago  
Views: 2,444


Rush Limbaugh is not going to own any part of the Rams after all. Oh, my word – the world is safe again!! Place another notch in the belt of liberal America.

Rush should not own any part of the NFL according to the very (self proclaimed) anti-racist folks: Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. They drafted a letter to the NFL strongly opposing the inclusion of Rush Limbaugh on any ticket to purchase the Rams specifically stating Limbaugh has made his wealth propagandizing the fears of white people.

Could that argument be made about Sharpton and Jackson too? Have they not made their fame by exploiting the fears of the black community? There is no doubt they have crusaded for rights of the black community – even crossing the line and doing so against evidence that strongly supported the one they backed was (Duke rape case, OJ, Tawany Brawley) lying. That did not matter – only that the evils of the rich white man be exposed and Sharpton and Jackson had their much desired time in front of the camera.

Sharpton has made waves repeatedly and so too has Jackson with their very own racial rants. Jackson has called New York “hymietown” made derogatory comments against white people, Jews, Asians... yet has the power to infuriate a population so quickly (as does Sharpton) and sometimes, so violently - that validity does matter. Their reputation does matter. Their facts do matter.

Both Jackson and Sharpton have made their fame the same way as Rush Limbaugh– exploiting the fears of a race. There is no difference between the three men.

The NFL's official website has a slew of articles on the matter. One of the articles quotes Al Sharpton stating the drop of Limbaugh (from the bid) is “a moral victory for all Americans – especially the players that have been unfairly castigated by Rush Limbaugh.” Castigated... which players is he specifically referring to? I wonder if he got that from his buddy Jackson ... oh, wait – that was CASTRATE that Jackson was referring to when he said someone should cut Obama's “nu** off”for talking down to black people. I guess it's a good thing Obama wasn't a part of the bid or maybe Sharpton got the two mixed up.

The point is not that Rush got dropped from the bid – but rather that as a country we are still accepting that one can say anything – even if it is not true. Does the NFL have such high morals that it just could never accept someone as God-awful as Rush Limbaugh on the 50 yard line? If that's the case – why did they over look Michael Vick? At least Limbaugh is not a convicted felon and if morals were truly an issue, Jackson and Sharpton should have been morally obligated to pen a letter to the NFL commissioner complaining when the Eagles signed Michael Vick. The words should be something along the lines of: “Mr. Commissioner, we are against the signing of Michael Vick to the Eagles. This is a bad idea since allowing this would be a great loss to the morals of all Americans.”

Double standards exist and this is a pure example of them.

Rush Limbaugh's politics are as offensive to some as Keith Olbermann's are to others. Unless the NFL is sponsoring the Democratic Party, the dumping of Rush Limbaugh from the bid to purchase the Rams was ridiculous. Political pressure by the left in this country is out of hand and I know one thing – all things political turn around and little things often cause the complete reversal of political power.

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon

Related Allvoices Contributions

News Stories
 
  • News Source: Androscoggin News | about 1 month ago
    Louis Rams was torpedoed, in part, by commentators and NFL players suggesting that Limbaugh is a racist who has no business being a part of the NFL...CNN's Reliable Sources this weekend and acknowledged that he did not have a credible source for a...
  • News Source: Canadian Free Press | about 1 month ago
    For me, the Limbaugh Incident was “the straw that broke the camel’s back” as my mom used to say. Then I thought, as a Christian should I go after Sharpton and Jackson? The words of Edmund Burke came to mind, “The only thing needed for evil to...
  • News Source: Canadian Free Press | about 1 month ago
    Louis Rams-manufactured quote thing, inviting himself to speak with NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, claiming that Limbaugh made disparaging remarks about NFL players, and when Rush rebuts there’s only one thing left for Sharpton to do to reclaim...
  • News Source: Canadian Free Press | about 1 month ago
    Once it was discovered that they were looking rather unprofessional, they belatedly decided to do research and regurgitated old quotes out of context in an effort salvage a minimum of external credibility. As apologizing for a wrong against a...
  • News Source: Disinfo.com | about 1 month ago
    Even after informing him that some people might try to make an issue of my participation, Mr. Checketts said he didn’t much care...It didn’t take long before my name was selectively leaked to the media as part of the Checketts investment group.
  • News Source: The Fresno Bee | about 1 month ago
    Racism flows both ways' Why is it that the likes of Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson get front page attention for criticizing the racial equity of Rush Limbaugh and get a pass on their own obvious racial bias? Blacks can recite any racist remark they...
Blogs
 >
  • Blog Source: www.getjealous.com
    Al Sharpton, one of the most vocal critics of Limbaugh's bid. "It is a moral victory for all Americans — especially the players that have been unfairly castigated by Rush Limbaugh," Sharpton said in a statement. "This decision ...
  • Blog Source: nationalconversation.typepad.com
    "It is a moral victory for all Americans - especially the players that have been unfairly castigated by Rush Limbaugh," Sharpton said in a statement. "This decision will also uphold the unifying standards of major sports.
  • Blog Source: www.contracostatimes.com
    "It is a moral victory for all Americans — especially the players that have been unfairly castigated by Rush Limbaugh," Sharpton said. Jaguars: Still reeling from a 41-0 loss at Seattle, running back Maurice Jones-Drew lashed out at the ...
  • Blog Source: spectator.org
    This has caused racial hucksters Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton to formally lobby against Rush's bid to buy the Rams. Sharpton, in fact, sent a letter to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell in which he urges the league to reject Limbaugh's ...
  • Blog Source: online.worldmag.com
    One of Limbaugh's harshest critics, Al Sharpton, called the move “a moral victory for all Americans—especially the players that have been unfairly castigated by Rush Limbaugh.” Sharpton later added that pro sports should not welcome ...
  • Blog Source: www.redstate.com
    I think Mark Levin, on his radio show last night, asked the right question: is Al Sharpton running the NFL? The last I checked, he didn't. But Sharpton sure seemed like he did when he announced, loudly, that Rush Limbaugh shouldn't be ... we need to
Images
 >
 
Videos
 >
 
Posted By RossErdmann RossErdmann | about 1 month ago
I don't think this in and of itself is a big story. I think it serves as more a symbol then anything else of a bigger problem. That problem being the double-standard on conservatives. Do we honestly believe that the other owners are all clean?
Posted By firesisle firesisle | about 1 month ago
Sharpton and Jackson really have very little room to talk. I'm pretty sure that if Jeremiah Wright was one of the prospective owners, neither one would be making much of a issue of it.
Posted By JerrySatire JerrySatire | about 1 month ago
Rush Limbaugh should invest in bull manure. He's an expert in the field.
[:-0
JerrySatire
www.Lampoon.net
Posted By Write4Life Write4Life | about 1 month ago
Ross and Firesisle - you're both correct. There is an all out war on conservatives in this country by liberal media and news. This administration is REALLY hard to swallow given their own bias and complete blockage of any attempt to connect to the right. People may have hated George Bush, but he never ran on a ticket that claimed to want change and to try and reach all and be bipartisan - OBama did.

He is the leader of war ON the conservatives. I personally see it as a character flaw that will eventually cause him the Presidency.

The demonstrations of Sharpton and Jackson through the years have always been slanted and to think that Rush Limbaugh's attempt to buy a very small portion of an NFL team when there are numerous felons playing (and perhaps owning) is more of a news story than Jackson's comments "caught on tape" stating Obama should have his balls cut off - well, that's the media for you.

Fortunately - there is youtube...and a whole lot of conservatives that have become more vocal.

The biggest problem the Republican party has right now is that it is too busy trying to appease the left.

The politicizing of Limbaugh's purchase of something not at all political in nature - it's not right...but, apparantly - it is left.
Posted By Redhanded101 Redhanded101 | about 1 month ago
I heard that one of the reasons that Rush Limbaugh was pressured to drop his bid was because George Soros may have been another of the investors. The NFL Commissioner is a joke.

The State Run Media just loathes Rush Limbaugh because he is only one of a handful of media people that holds Obama accountable and he does it every day for 3 hours. The media is so bent on making Obama look good at whatever cost that CNN must go out of it's way to Fact-Check an SNL skit but ignores doing any research on any of the supposed Limabaugh remarks.
I guess this makes Obama inelible to own a team as well since he has made a few racist remarks along the way. None better than his "Typical White People" gem.


Anyway you slice it, it's a victory for Rush. More ratings and a bigger fatter, wider wallet.
Posted By Write4Life Write4Life | about 1 month ago
I love this - Directly from DailyKos (you KNOW this is coming down soon)...
"Limbaugh, today, attacked George Soros for his failed NFL bid. He has a new conspiracy theory on his twisted mind. Of course that the Right playbook, if something bad happened to them, Soros must be behind it. Beck showed us on his graphics that Soros was Obama's masterpuppet. It feels so good to see Rush Limbaugh getting depressed."

If it ends up Limbaugh was booted via Soros - that will truly be DaliyKos' true END OF CREDIBILITY.
Posted By ahol888 ahol888 | about 1 month ago
I didn't realize that the Daily Kos and the Huffington Post had any credibility in the first place. Rush would have not been the majority owner in the group, so he would not have made any football decisions. The real problem that arose was that the players' union were going to boycott having free agents sign with the Rams if Dave Checketts' group would have won the bid. That would have been unfair for Rams' fans and the community of St. Louis. The team sucks now and would have perpetually sucked if the team was not able to pick up any free agents in the future. I don't care if you like Rush or not, but this is the first time since his Oxycontin meltdown in which he acted properly when he was being attacked. With the protesting, that is Sharpton's and Jackson's modus operandi within the black community which is why the urbanized areas are still very crappy despite their decades of activism. You will know a person by their fruit.
Posted By amalgam80 amalgam80 | about 1 month ago
So whose fault is it that Rush is out of the bidding?

Jackson and Sharpton or Soros?

Is this a political issue or not?

Is it racist or not?

Is it an economical issue or not?


Or is it that someone that makes millions being inflammatory, loud, crude, hateful and ridiculious has brought himself trouble for the things he has said in the past. And rumors of things he's said and how he's said it?

If anyone thinks Limbaugh sees black Americans on the same level as white Americans hasn't listened to Limbaugh enough. His views bubble up to the surface routinely. His views and his words have now caused him some trouble. This is the same kind of trouble Limbaugh inflicts on others. So be it.

Whatever will he do with the millions he was going to invest in that team? Maybe invest in US Bonds?
Posted By CaliforniaMike CaliforniaMike | about 1 month ago
This really isn't about conservatism. Thirty-one of the 32 owners -- strangely, the Rams were the only exception -- donated more to Republican candidates last year than to Democrats.

It isn't about Rush holding Obama accountable.

It's about racism, and even though he hasn't said one or two of the things people accused him of, he's said plenty of racist things over the years. And as Rush has said many times himself, words mean things. Words have consequences.

FYI, I'm pretty sure they wouldn't approve Jackson, Sharpton or Wright as owners either.
Reply By firesisle firesisle | about 1 month ago
Actually, it's about the appearance of racism; the owners group that Rush was associated decided to boot him because they felt it would impair their chances to land the team, and keep it in St. Louis. Their actions were due, in part to reactions to his statements by NFL free agents, and the head of the NFL Players Union, who, if memory serves me, was extremely active in Obama's campaign.
Reply By TheRegularAmerican TheRegularAmerican | about 1 month ago
Name one (1) truly racist comment Rush Limbaugh has said. Make sure you can prove it, not hearsay. Before you bring up the Donovan McNabb issue I suggest you listen carefully to what he said. It wasn't racist at all. I really hope Rush sues the pants off those journalists and commentators who have defamed his character by spreading lies. I have listened to Rush for 15 years and have NEVER heard him say anything racist. You said yourself, Clarence Thomas officiated his third wedding. If he were racist, that wouldn't have happened. Everything that comes out of Sharpton and Jackson's mouths is racist.
Reply By CaliforniaMike CaliforniaMike | about 1 month ago
I'll give you a few, and Media Matters has tape of some of them:

1. Get that bone out of your nose and call me back.

2. All police artists' sketches of suspects look vaguely like Jesse Jackson.

3. The NAACP should hold riot practice. They should buy a liquor store and practice holding it up.

There's more, but why bore you.
Reply By CaliforniaMike CaliforniaMike | about 1 month ago
I'll give you a few, and Media Matters has tape of some of them:

1. Get that bone out of your nose and call me back.

2. All police artists' sketches of suspects look vaguely like Jesse Jackson.

3. The NAACP should hold riot practice. They should buy a liquor store and practice holding it up.

There's more, but why bore you.
Posted By mikeyaj1 mikeyaj1 | about 1 month ago
I agree fully!
Posted By firesisle firesisle | about 1 month ago
But I think Jackson, and Sharpton would approve Wright...
Posted By Write4Life Write4Life | about 1 month ago
Mike -

"
FYI, I'm pretty sure they wouldn't approve Jackson, Sharpton or Wright as owners either."

Agreed. I HOPE.
Posted By tdreyer95 tdreyer95 | about 1 month ago
very nice
Posted By mich509 mich509 | about 1 month ago
I don't think this in and of itself is a big story. I think it serves as more a symbol then anything else of a bigger problem. That problem being the double-standard on conservatives. Do we honestly believe that the other owners are all clean?
Reply By CaliforniaMike CaliforniaMike | about 1 month ago
Nothing to do with conservatives. This is about racism.
Posted By winds7seas winds7seas | about 1 month ago
I think it's much more simple than all that. Rush Limbaugh is just a mean-spirited, nasty man and they just don't want him in their club.

My God! I sure wouldn't want him as my next-door neighbor!
Posted By Usernamee Usernamee | about 1 month ago
GO RAMS
Reply By ektarr ektarr | about 1 month ago
As would I!
Posted By AsherKade AsherKade | about 1 month ago
who gives a shit about Limbaugh!He is just eaGER FOR ATTN.!
Posted By bobby0429 bobby0429 | about 1 month ago
Not a big news!!
The world is safe again??? Who one knows!!!
Posted By VampoVampe VampoVampe | about 1 month ago
nice job
Posted By Changez Changez | about 1 month ago
W4L, honestly, why does it matter if Limbaugh wasn't allowed to buy into the team? If he has the money he should be allowed to, but if the teams players or investors think there is a stigma attached with him, or think it will bring them negative publicity, then they also have the right to refuse, unless he makes them an offer they can't refuse. Without knowing the details it looks like the investors group did feel this and Limbaugh is the only person to blame if his views are deemed detrimental to the interests of the club. That's just business.
Reply By firesisle firesisle | about 1 month ago
While I understand the reasoning of the owner's group in dropping Limbaugh, I think it's important to know that, at least according to Limbaugh, they approached him, not the other way around, and the entire scenario was discussed with them beforehand, and they assured him that come hell-or-high-water, they would stand behind him. To a degree, this makes it a matter of business ethics as well.
Reply By Changez Changez | about 1 month ago
Fair enough, and that's something I didn't know. But then it is according to Limbaugh and he hasn't got the best reputation for truth in these matters, which is something that speaks to why they might not want him on board. His word, in this case, is not golden, that is the reputation he has, and that expediency is what is costing him. If he is telling the truth, then it is a matter of ethics and he can and should sue them.
Posted By maysarahsdfs maysarahsdfs | about 1 month ago
wow.
Posted By judeleneperez judeleneperez | about 1 month ago
Really wow.
Reported by Write4Life
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @4401730

Most Popular Reports

Related Tweets

Related Allvoices Reports

Related People

Contributions

Help and Accounts


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.