So no one is denied medical care in this country, and most people who don't have care can qualify for one program or another.
Gee, I never knew.
Maybe our health care system is fine the way it is.
I feel a little like Rodney Dangerfield's character in the movie "Back to School," where the professor in his economics class asked him where he was going to build his widget factory.
"How about Fantasyland?"
You folks ought to read Jonathan Cohn's book "Sick," which details on a case-by-case basis -- with original reporting -- exactly how our ridiculous system is killing or bankrupting people around the country.
Next time you think no one is denied medical care, try to get chemotherapy for your cancer without the money to pay for it. Or try to get an expensive medication for a rare condition.
Is it right that people should have to sell their homes, wipe out their savings accounts and mortgage their futures just to get medical care?
Even in the one place where they can't deny you -- the emergency room -- that care is anything but free. You may not be able to pay for it, but unless you're willing to destroy your credit rating and ignore years of being dunned for payments (including being taken to court), it isn't free.
There's no question people die when they don't have insurance. In fact, the single greatest factor in whether you will survive cancer is whether or not you have health insurance.
Think about this for a minute.
Have we really become a society willing to judge whether people live or die simply by the amount of money they have? It's one thing to be able to afford top-of-the-line medical care because you're rich, but are we really willing to tell middle-class people without insurance that if you get sick, you'd better be prepared to sell everything you've ever worked for just to stay alive?
It's a fact that more than half of personal bankruptcy filings the last 10 years have been precipitated by unexpected medical expenses, and as rapidly as medical costs are increasing, that's not going to change anytime soon.
Sure, you can get chemotherapy -- if you're willing to sell a kidney to a rich guy who needs one.
This isn't about socialized medicine, and it certainly isn't meant to be critical of dedicated medical personnel. There are plenty of doctors and nurses who donate all or part of their time to work in neighborhood clinics that serve the poor.
But consider this: A couple of years back, Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman reported in the New York Times that between 1972 and 2001, incomes in the top 10 percent of income distribution went up by an average of 34 percent, only about 1 percent a year.
In the top 1 percent, they increased 87 percent during the same time.
In the top .01 percent, they increased 497 percent.
The Fed reported that between 2001 and 2004, inflation adjusted family incomes for all of us dropped by 2.3 percent.
Anyone who thinks the rich -- the people who own the insurance companies -- aren't getting richer at the expense of the rest of us just hasn't been paying attention.
As I said earlier, I've got no problem with rich people paying more for "Cadillac" care. But I think just the fact of being an American ought to at least qualify a person for reasonable medical care.
Nobody should have to sell their home to buy medication.
Nobody should have to go bankrupt because they get sick.
That happens all too often, so please, don't tell me no one is denied medical care in this country.
It just isn't true.