The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

Taxation, Taxation: States Now Charging Service Charges For Traffic Tickets?

By: Ross1776 send a private message
Phoenix : AZ : USA | about 1 month ago  
Views: 23

For Any And All Conserve-ative Americans:

Even in light of all those millions in stimulus monies that have now been distributed to the states and state legislatures in order to fund local and municipal budgets, and with also the ever increasing amounts of fines and penalties that are now leveraged against American citizens nationwide in monies collected for routine traffic violations (and I'm not speaking about the out of control fines and punishments on those low level misdemeanor DUIs that have been a gravy train for the states also), here's a new one.

It appears the greed of our governmental officials and creative ways in which to assess and facilitate homelessness in the taxpaying citizens who are now losing their homes right and left knows no bounds.

Many states are now also inflicting "service charge" fees for the collection of those sums. Benefitting with the fines themselves isn't enough, now in order to "process" that revenue the states are adding another "double jeopardy" to broken headlight and speeding tickets.

Unbelieveable.

And the states also wonder why the state citizens are also getting increasingly dissatisfied with their local governments at this point, who are also behind this new health care reform most of all in order to continue collecting all those local taxes which have now progressively been collected to fund their programs, and thus then illegally transferring such authority to the federal government so they can add another source of unaccountable revenue in the process?

Then plead poverty for the local services and functions for which they are legally responsible, while doling out the freebies to their corporate campaign donors in private state grant monies and no-bid contracts?

Extortion in the name of civic responsibility and public safety is now creating the many who are now on the welfare rolls, has that not yet occurred to these state and local governments?

The ones who complain about those costs also, yet continue in total oblivion as to the impact that charging fines and fees that have no rational basis, or even letting the punishment fit the crime has turned our streets and neighborhoods into no more than police states and our police nothing more than revenue collectors, by and large.

Isn't that what property taxes were intended for, in order to fund the local police and fire departments, and in the past points simply awarded against drivers licenses for moving violations, and proof of compliance with safety requirements? If public safety is the goal, isn't that the proper and legal redress for these low level crimes which are taking our police force now off the streets in order to combat the true threats to the public safety, theft and bodily harm?

What is there to "processing" a check or cash payment, and if they are passing on bank service charge fees to the public, then maybe the state ought to switch to another bank since I am sure that most banks would actively compete for the business and waive those fees and costs for any general fund or municipal accounts.

I mean they still give free checking and waive ATM fees and costs, and even VISA and Mastercard processing fees for retailers that have large enough accounts, and it would appear in most states their accounts would beat even Wal-Mart's. If not, then why not simply pass a law "regulating" the banking industry and make passing off and charging for simple keystrokes with computer banking at legislated levels illegal and "usurous" since the bank is also double collecting with the charging of interest on those credit card transactions, and also now fees in order to simply use their plastic? And rental fees for the machines?

And the banks were bankrupt? Gee, back in the old days they used to give free glasses with every checking account, and primarily loaned sums for new home purchases at guaranteed fixed interest rates, or even afforded assumption of existing loans by new purchasers if the purchaser qualified at the existing interest rate. Now, the junk fees and costs that these banks are charging are not simply usurous, they are outrageous.

Like if at all such ridiculous and illegal sums are levied, fees less than 10% of the cost and price of the ticket, or $2.50 (the average fee for a VISA charge), whichever is less is the going rate. A $10.00 service charge on a busted tailight or the even better one "failure to have an inspection" seems a little over the top and also "double jeopardy" at its core. Not to mention on a cash transaction for the payment of the fine, nothing more than actual theft since just what "service" is there involved? A run to the local bank at the rate of say, $300.00 or more per mile?

If the repair is made, then those fees, costs and fines should be waived in any event and insofar as those inspections, well unless and until they are ordered for foreigners also in this country then it would appear we are giving "privileges and immunities" now to non-Americans over those of the lawful citizens.

And thus, unconstitutional also at its core. If a car is involved in an accident that for some reason was not mechanically sound to be driven, then that should be a matter for a jury to decide in a civil trial, and an accident is an accident and repair of the property of the one so damaged or injured is letting the punishment fit the crime and also making repair and remuneration to that victim. If loss of life is involved, then that person is charged with negligent homicide, after all, and this also a matter for a jury to weigh.

Not for the government to so order, and the punishment then increased accordingly for any damage done as a part of the punitive damage phase.

It appears again to be babysitting the public, and unfortunately measures such is these demonstrate that the level of citizen satisfaction with not simply federal, but the state governments, is increasing in leaps and bounds.

And in this economy, sometimes those repairs also have to wait until after the rent is paid, or the adjustable or interest free usurous mortage is paid, and the grocery bill, electric bill (now increased with those Cap & Trade taxes), and gasoline bills (with those increased "double" state and federal taxes) are paid.

Since unlike Washington and the states, citizens can't simply print more money, and do understand that those new upgraded "science and technology" computers are important for those police cruizers, courts, and legislators desks, but some of us are driving 14 year old cars that were recently damaged by the hurricanes that the insurance companies refuse to cover, or the since the "new and improved" science based technology automobiles insurance rates now have climbed so high "progressively" in order to cover all those new gadgets installed in those vehicles in the event of an accident or burglary.

Was there any votes taken on these new "taxes," or the amounts of those fines? Since, after all, it is the "governed" that are providing them - yet were never consulted for these new "property thefts."

Oh, I forgot. They've also got that covered.

A great many states have also instituted not only "service charges" but also charges for "payment agreements" in order to pay those "service charges" and fines and fees.

Pretty generous of them and judicious.....right?

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon
News Stories
 
  • News Source: Uinta County News | about 1 month ago
    03 PM ET Health Care: Congress is ready to spend a lot of other people's money on its idea of reform. Yet one sure way to bring down costs is being ignored, and that says a lot about the Democrats' effort. The Democrats pushing hard for Washington's...
  • Posted By Punditty Punditty | about 1 month ago
    At one point you wrote: "Since unlike Washington and the states, citizens can't simply print more money..."

    Gadzooks, I think I've got it! Some enterprising congressman should introduce a bill allowing citizens to print up our own money! The " 'If The Fed Can Do It, Why Can't We?' Act of 2010"...coming soon?

    It may not be Constitutional, but it sure would be funny to hear elected officials saying "But we can't have people just printing up money out of thin air!" ...especially if those same officials had voted against auditing The Fed.
  • Posted By Ross1776 Ross1776 | about 1 month ago
    I did have to laugh at this one, since it would appear the hypocricy is pretty ludicrous at this point, don't you think? I mean, the tab on the citizens now in the trillion, and we are "service charging" for broken tailight and speeding tickets (some of which now are $100.00 to $200.00 each depending on the speeds involved, and basically at $10.00 per hour you can see that half a week's wages are involved in some of these victimless crimes at minimum wage).

    But of course, as one who has studied and knows the background of the Fed, it is of course nothing more than a front for the British bankers, who usurped this country under Wilson back in 1913, and have been "progressively" instituting British law and rule once again.

    Or are you simply a few years behind the program here, and unaware of just who the owners of the Fed actually are, and what a "shell" for those bankers it was created to be and Congress in order to institute this now progressively world economic disaster and government for the cabal that has socialized their wealth on the backs of their fellow countrymen in the process.

    Most of which are "misrepresentatives" now on the Hill, and serving on the Supreme Court?
  • Posted By spike-breaker08 spike-breaker08 | about 1 month ago
    that's unbelievable! my God! that should be brought up right away!
  • Reported by Ross1776
    Report Your News Got a similar story?
    Add it to the network!

    Or add related content to this report

    Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @4354948

    Most Popular Reports

    Related Tweets

    • markknoller

      @markknoller He says the vote as "another step forward" to arrange a better health care deal for the American people.

      18 days ago
    • markknoller

      @markknoller "I think they've done excellent work," Obama said of the Senate Finance Committee efforts on a health care bill.

      18 days ago
    • markknoller

      @markknoller Now the WH will work with Senate leaders to merge the Finance Committee bill with the version of the Senate Health Committee.

      18 days ago
    • markknoller

      @markknoller Vote in the Senate Finance Committee was 14-9 to report out the Baucus health care bill. One republican, Olympic Snowe, voted with the Dems.

      18 days ago
    • awesomechoi

      @awesomechoi RT @pmintz Senate Finance Committee approves Baucus health care bill http://bit.ly/uIMqo

      18 days ago
    • pmintz

      @pmintz oops..sent bad url. Sen. Finance Comm. approves Baucus health care bill http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9BAD0S00.htm

      18 days ago
    • pmintz

      @pmintz Senate Finance Committee approves Baucus health care bill http://bit.ly/10gUPb

      18 days ago
    • oskargarcia

      @oskargarcia Sen. committee votes to send 10-year, $829M health care bill to full Senate. Snowe only GOP to vote w/ Dems. AP: http://bit.ly/4m7NrC

      18 days ago
    • FromCarl

      @FromCarl What Snowe's vote for health insurance bill means: It's not over, and Dems must fend off efforts to steer left: http://bit.ly/1AFev5 url cx

      18 days ago
    • jacksonjk

      @jacksonjk Senate Finance Committee passes health care reform bill 14 to 9. Snowe was the only Republican vote.

      18 days ago

    Related People

    Contributions

    Help and Accounts


    Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

    © Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.