Well this was a surprise. Obama is an incredibly amazing person and has created a profound hope for the future. He has seeded a mentality that if we believe in change and that change can happen, it will. His speech in Cairo earlier this year is a unique speech as it invites into a diplomatic solution and bridging differences between religions, cultures, ethnicities, nationalities and political genres. Yet it is a bit of a surprise that he gets the Nobel Peace Prize now.
The reason for the prize is shortly "... for 108 years, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has sought to stimulate precisely that international policy and those attitudes for which Obama is now the world's leading spokesman...". I think it is admirable, but is that enough base for a Nobel Peace Prize? Maybe. I do not think this necessarily is helping his strategy along to move into a more diplomatic way of dealing with conflicts around the world.
Talking about change is one thing and it is truly inspiring. Yet to keep the momentum, we need to see actions and results. I am definitely not hinting at all he is not taking any actions or that we will not see results. Time will tell that. His strategy is definitely primarily on the diplomatic side yet supported by firm military operations which on the short term might not show tangible results. It is the only sustainable solution on the long term. However, giving him a Nobel Peace Prize could potentially create a unnecessary pressure for fast tangible results and play into the hands of his opponents that he has not taken any actions nor created any tangible results.
I am torn. Hmm. I really don't know.
Maybe it is good that we discuss if he "deserves" the prize or not. Maybe it is bad. One thing is sure. He has created a hope for the world that change might come.