The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

DALAI LAMA, LATEST VICTIM OF APPEASEMENT

Washington : DC : USA | about 1 month ago  
Views: 4,700
  • Obama Lama
    Obama Lama
    Posted by: Redhanded101
    Obama lama
  • The Dalai Lama bows during the Light of Truth Award ceremony in Washington
    The Dalai Lama bows during the Light of Truth Award ceremony in ...
    Source: Reuters
  • The Dalai Lama bows to Chinese writer Wang during the Light of Truth Award ceremony in Washington
    The Dalai Lama bows to Chinese writer Wang during the Light of Truth ...
    Source: Reuters
  • The Dalai Lama and House Speaker Pelosi bow to each other during the Light of Truth Award ceremony in Washington
    The Dalai Lama and House Speaker Pelosi bow to each other during the ...
    Source: Reuters
  • The Dalai Lama speaks at the Light of Truth Awards ceremony in Washington
    The Dalai Lama speaks at the Light of Truth Awards ceremony in ...
    Source: Reuters
  • The Dalai Lama embraces Chinese writer Wang during the Light of Truth Award ceremony in Washington
    The Dalai Lama embraces Chinese writer Wang during the Light of Truth ...
    Source: Reuters
  • House Speaker Pelosi and Richard Gere listen to the Dalai Lama during the Light of Truth Award ceremony in Washington
    House Speaker Pelosi and Richard Gere listen to the Dalai Lama during ...
    Source: Reuters
  • The Dalai Lama shared his views on gender after being introduced at a Washington awards ceremony by Nancy Pelosi
    The Dalai Lama shared his views on gender after being introduced at a ...
    Source: AFP
Obama Lama

It’s been 18 years since the last time the Dalai Lama visited the United States and not met with the sitting President. The 14th Dalai Lama, the Tibetan spiritual leader was quietly brushed aside by President Obama apparently for fear of appearing too friendly with a nation that China has suppressed and brutalized over the years in their attempts to subjugate their cultural and religious beliefs.

Of course the spin from the WH and the MSM was a little different. While this is clearly another example of allowing another nation to violate the human rights of its people, the WH downplayed the missed opportunity as a way to get on China’s good side. A strange way to conduct diplomacy when it involves ignoring the strangle hold on 6 million Tibetans and the Draconian rules that they are subjected to. Anyway you slice it; his snubbing of the Dalai Lama can be filed under the heading of Appeasement.

The Dalai Lama can take some solace in the fact that that he has not been alone in this strange fixation by President Obama to be liked. In the 9 months since taking office, this President has made it a point of fact to go out of his way to try and repair the so called “damaged image of America created by George Bush”. A notion that this White House has been sensitive to and caused them at every opportunity to instinctively bow to every Dick & Harry that may have had a gripe with the way the US conducted it’s Foreign Policy under George Bush. This includes the Palestinians & Iranians who have resorted to violence and terrorism instead of diplomacy.

It is obvious that in this case, Barack Obama did not want to upset or create any unnecessary controversy with China or it’s President, Hu Jintao before their meeting next month. We know that the President was sensitive to the fact that China has responded negatively to other leaders who have met with the Dalai Lama. After learning that French President Zarkozy had met with the Dalai Lama, China called off a major European Union Summit. It has also tried to pressure South Africa into denying the Dalai Lama a necessary visa to attend a peace conference in the country. So the last thing this president wants to do is have the Chinese get mad as us and demand that we pay back all the money we owe them. God knows we can’t pay it back.

There is no denying the fact that this was a clear show of disrespect to the Tibetan cause and the struggles of a people whose resolve can be buoyed by the symbolic gestures of support from world leaders such as Barack Obama. Once again when presented with an opportunity to lead and stand for freedom, Obama simply sells out.

This is the Barack Obama we have become accustomed to. In his short time in office, he has shown over & over that he is more willing to bow to the enemy instead of standing up to them for fear of not being “liked”. When Iran held it’s elections over the summer and the people protested against Mahmoud Ahmadinejad once they found out the results were rigged, Obama remained mysteriously silent. He ignored the pleas of protestors who wanted to hear the leader of the free world condemn the results. Instead,Obama stayed quiet and chose not to “meddle” in another countries business.

When Honduran President Zelaya was ousted by it’s people for trying to rewrite the Constitution in an attempt to keep himself in power for perpetuity, Obama sided with the Leftist President and cut-off aid to the country - one of the poorest nations in the world, until it’s power hungry President was put back in power. This even after learning that Zelaya’s regime was being backed by Venezuelan Dictator, Hugo Chavez.

He has thumbed his nose at the Israeli’s continuously while at the same time allowed Iran to continue developing its Nuclear Weapons Program. He has suppressed intelligence information that Iran had other Nuclear facilities that were being used to develop materials for a Nuclear Bomb. He never said a word to Israel about these developments and if it were not for French President Nicolas Zarkozy who insisted on taking strong action against Iran, Obama would have remained silent.

So to the Dalai Lama, take a number. It is really nothing personal. We just need to get everyone of our enemies to like us first. They may not respect us, but they will like us.

Reference:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/6262938/Barack-Obama-cancels-meeting-with-Dalai-Lama-to-keep-China-happy.html#

http://prospect.org/cs/articles?article=dalai_drama

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon

Related Allvoices Contributions

News Stories
 
  • News Source: Ynet News | about 1 month ago
    The Dalai Lama in the sukkah   Photo: AP He didn't get invitation to White House, but Adas Israel Synagogue in Washington receives Tibet's spiritual leader with open arms...Though he was not invited to the White House, the Adas Israel Synagogue in...
  • News Source: Taiwan News | about 1 month ago
    President Barack Obama to seize on his surprise Nobel Peace Prize win Friday to forge peace in the globe's trouble spots and rid the world of nuclear weapons. From Tokyo to Cape Town, news that the 48-year-old had won the prestigious award just nine...
  • News Source: NewKerala | about 1 month ago
    Obama caused a flurry earlier this week by delaying the traditional visit by the Dalai Lama to the White House until after his summit with Chinese President Hu Jintao in China next month. The Dalai Lama has led the fight against China's oppression of...
  • News Source: Phayul | about 1 month ago
    Dharamsala, Oct 9: China on Friday warned members of the US Congress to 'stop using the Tibet issue' to meddle in Beijing's domestic politics, after top US lawmakers gave a human rights award to the Dalai Lama. 'We urge some US members of Congress...
  • News Source: Seattle Times | about 1 month ago
    China on Friday accused the United States of meddling in its domestic affairs after the American lawmakers recognized the Dalai Lama with an award for his efforts to improve human rights...Congress presented the award, which was in honor of the late...
  • News Source: Sofia Echo | about 1 month ago
    In its citation, the Nobel Jury said that the US president had won the award "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples". The committee added that "Mr Obama has, as president, created a new...
Images
 >
 
Videos
 >
 
Posted By spike-breaker08 spike-breaker08 | about 1 month ago
There are instances that a political leader needs to sacrifice..
Reply By Redhanded101 Redhanded101 | about 1 month ago
spike,

Sacrifice in the name of what?

Being liked over being respected?

Too many instances where he has sacrificed leadership for appeasement.
Reply By amalgam80 amalgam80 | about 1 month ago
I would say sacrifice in the name of helping us with Iran.
Reply By amalgam80 amalgam80 | about 1 month ago
First off, there is no "only" way, there is no one way, there is no guaranteed way.

And having balls to do something, isn't the same as blow the crap out of something. He has the "stones" to try diplomacy before bombing, last I read it looked like we were getting what we wanted.


"Helping us with Iran in what way? China has no loyalty to anyone. Especially to the US. China holds all the Chips right now. We owe them a ton of money, their economy is thriving and they have built up a strong military."

China has no loyalties to anyone? Really? Or do they have no loyalty to the U.S.? Cause last I checked China has loyalty to Iran and vice versa.

If we want China's help to pressure Iran in to doing something we want, not meeting with the Dalai Lama in person is fine with me.

What would have happened if we did meet up with the DL? All of the Tibetians problems would have been solved? We would have gone in with our troops and blown the crap out of the Chinese there? We would have put sanctions on China? Or would it have been just a photo op?

What exactly would have happened?

"We owe China a ton of money"

Yeah we sure do, we are a big money maker for the Chinese government. Especially the two and a half trillion we owe them for the Bush tax cut we borrowed from them. WE are in no position to do anything tough against them. Especially when we would like their help keeping Iran without a nuclear weapon.

We don't have it in us to be a global bully anymore. We can't do whatever we want whenever we want however we want. The past 30 years or so has brought us into that position.

And we know how China reacts everytime a U.S. President meets with a Dalai Lama, we've seen it for a long time.
Reply By firesisle firesisle | about 1 month ago
The only thing that will help us in Iran is a President with a set of stones... ain't gonna happen any time soon...
Reply By Redhanded101 Redhanded101 | about 1 month ago
A,

Helping us with Iran in what way? China has no loyalty to anyone. Especially to the US. China holds all the Chips right now. We owe them a ton of money, their economy is thriving and they have built up a strong military.

A better tactic may have been to talk to the Dalai Lama first and then get a read on how China would react.
Posted By ChristopherSzabo ChristopherSzabo | about 1 month ago
I am really shocked at this. Small countries could argue that they really need China's trade, but America? Surely not? This was not necessary, in my view, but as you say, a sellout. And what a terrible disappointment Mr Obama is! I really thought he was a great leader, and he does have a great manner and can speak well.
Guts, apparently, don't come with it.
Tragic, really.
Posted By Just_Playin_Dumb Just_Playin_Dumb | about 1 month ago
I see Obama has yet again made himself and the United States look like idiots! Good work Prez. I would love to ask him what are you thinking?
Posted By hasnain hasnain | about 1 month ago
really informative news thanks
Posted By maleon maleon | about 1 month ago
very informative
Posted By lecia lecia | about 1 month ago
from everything i have read the delai lama and the white house are both saying that they decided to wait and meet after obama meets with china…now whether that is to appease china or some other reason i don’t know

"He has suppressed intelligence information that Iran had other Nuclear facilities that were being used to develop materials for a Nuclear Bomb."

busch was sitting on this info also and the way i understand it france, brittan and israel also knew about it
Reply By DelilahStarling DelilahStarling | about 1 month ago
This article is pure opinion, speculation, and dramatization.

An interview with the Dalai Lama today on CNN, with Wolf Blitzer, revealed that there was no affront taken and no disappointment was expressed by the Dalai Lama on the delay in meeting with President Obama.

When asked if President Obama made a commitment to the Dalai Lama to speak to Chinese leaders regarding Tibet when he is in china, he indicated there was, indeed, such an understanding.

If the Dalai Lama himself is not offended by current circumstances surrounding his visit, perhaps it is because he has more direct communication with the White House than anyone gives him or Obama credit for.

Why?

So they can write articles like this one, which are based on nothing but biased, opinionated, and totally unsubstantiated rhetoric.
Reply By Redhanded101 Redhanded101 | about 1 month ago
Delilah,

Wolf Blitzer is not biased, opinionated and never engages in unsubstantiated rhetoric?

You were not there. What inside information would you have that you may want to share with us?

No one is that naive to believe that a lot of what comes out of the mouth of Wolf Blitzer is the Gospel. Even the White House has conceded that they dismissed the Dalai Lama for fear of appearing too friendly with someone that China has no regard for.

I think that on this one, the majority thinks it was disrespectful.
Reply By Redhanded101 Redhanded101 | about 1 month ago
lecia,

That the Bush administration may have know about it as well is true, but his motivation for not revealing it was different than the reason Obama held it back. I think Obama held it back because he did not want people to question him on his diplomatic approach once they found out that Iran was still moving ahead with it's NWD program. He did not want to be second guessed by people like saying, "All this talking to dictators is cynical and doesn't work". Which as it turned out, was true. It didn't matter to Iran that Obama was the new President and that somehow he would be able to sweet talk them into giving up their Nukes.
Reply By lecia lecia | about 1 month ago
i think they all held it back as a bargaining chip to be used at the right time
Posted By lecia lecia | about 1 month ago
honduras i just don't get...i keep thinking there must be something i'm missing here because i can not for the life of me figure out our governments action here
Reply By amalgam80 amalgam80 | about 1 month ago
ditto
Posted By BorderExplorer BorderExplorer | about 1 month ago
OK, Redhanded101, now I'm really spooked. First I found myself agreeing with Ross1776 on the AZ Sheriff, and now I'm agreeing with you re. the Dalai Lama. It must be "Backwards Day." Nice post.
Reply By DelilahStarling DelilahStarling | about 1 month ago
BorderExplorer, the best we can do at identifying legitimate sources of debate is by referencing credible sources, such as live interviews or Associated Press articles, links and quotes and references to sources that substantiate arguments.

Otherwise, they are nothing more than "opinion based rhetoric."

And this Redhanded101 article is nothing more than an opinionated post, without any factual substantiation.
Reply By Redhanded101 Redhanded101 | about 1 month ago
Delilah,

The problem is that since you are the only credible source on this site, it is hard to quote you or link to any of your articles that actually cover these types of stories.
I did reference two links to articles covering this story. The fact of the matter is that that these types of stories that question the President's motives or leadership qualities, are seldom reported on by the MSM. Unlike All the Global Warming Hysteria which is covered continously and give a positive spin.

My best opinion may not be yours, but there are many readers out there that want to hear the other side of the story. My opinions will hopefully engage more people and open up the debate to both sides. Everyone has the right to question remarks or opinions made on this site. If asked for additional information, I will try to provide it, but not every story is going to be want people want to hear.

From the comments I have received hear, it seems that many people agree with me.
Reply By Redhanded101 Redhanded101 | about 1 month ago
Border,

That is nice to hear. I hope I can return the favor.
Maybe the Dlai Lama can bring us all together....
Reply By Changez Changez | about 1 month ago
God, that was the most sappy thing I've ever heard you, or many people, say. I am looking for the sarcasm.
Posted By BassemMohamedEL-Lawendy BassemMohamedEL-Lawendy | about 1 month ago
very informative
Posted By Bethany Bethany | about 1 month ago
Sadly in agreement with you. I'd rather have the respect than the liking, personally, but it's not an ideal world.
Posted By CaliforniaMike CaliforniaMike | about 1 month ago
Just wondering about one thing. You do a pretty good job of spelling some difficult names, but every reference to the president is "Barak," not the correct spelling of "Barack."

Is that intentional? If it is, I think it detracts from your post.
Reply By Redhanded101 Redhanded101 | about 1 month ago
C,

Unintentional. I wish his name was Barry.
Correction noted...
Reply By Punditty Punditty | about 1 month ago
Since we are discussing typos, the headline misspells "Dalai" as "Delai."
Posted By mattmus12 mattmus12 | about 1 month ago
it would be easier if it was barry
Posted By Punditty Punditty | about 1 month ago
Inexcusable behavior by President Obama. That the Red Chinese find The Dalai Lama a threat is simply further testimony to the immorality of their views on Tibet. Obama chose a politically calculated interpretation of expediency over the morally correct choice. Never a good move in the "karma" department, but hey, if it makes the Chinese happy...

"I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just."
-Thomas Jefferson
Posted By WordSlinger WordSlinger | about 1 month ago
Great Story!!
Posted By AmmarElrefaay AmmarElrefaay | about 1 month ago
it would be easier if it was barry
Posted By rroxas08 rroxas08 | about 1 month ago
I love reading this article and the comment, US President Obama don't wish to have meeting with the Dalai Lama, definitely not a good thing, Dalai Lama is person of peace. If the Chinese don't want the Dalai Lama it doesn't that the rest of the world will do the same.
Posted By rroxas08 rroxas08 | about 1 month ago
correction: I love reading this article and the comments, US President Obama don't wish to have meeting with the Dalai Lama, definitely not a good thing, Dalai Lama is person of peace. If the Chinese don't want the Dalai Lama it doesn't mean that the rest of the world will do the same.
Posted By hon72590 hon72590 | about 1 month ago
wow
Posted By ali20200 ali20200 | about 1 month ago
It’s been 18 years since the last time the
Posted By ali20200 ali20200 | about 1 month ago
wow
Posted By dragon9569 dragon9569 | about 1 month ago
.....
Posted By OMega3_2yew OMega3_2yew | about 1 month ago
How does a white man symbalically embrace a black man?

"A synchronous encownter with a falling acorn doesn't achieve much unless it hits two heads before hitting the ground."
~Jean Conteau
Reply By Write4Life Write4Life | about 1 month ago
Great article Red
Posted By FaRiSX FaRiSX | about 1 month ago
intersting...
Posted By arabellavine arabellavine | about 1 month ago
oh my!
Posted By yungblud1 yungblud1 | about 1 month ago
oh wow
Posted By momonator3 momonator3 | about 1 month ago
Very interesting article read
Posted By ahol888 ahol888 | about 1 month ago
He spurns the once-in-a-lifetime meeting with the Gandhi of this generation but yet listened to the messages of Dr. Jeremiah Wright. Mind-boggling.
Reply By Write4Life Write4Life | about 1 month ago
Let's not forget how he sat quietly through the 50-minute diatribe given by Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega.
Reply By Changez Changez | about 1 month ago
While I may not personally be a big fan of the dalai lama (I think he's an idiot and a fraud) I still think you have a point RH. It is bad tactics to turn away this man, especially when, as you say, he could meet him and gauge the Chinese reaction first. Turning him away is a sop to the Chinese and an unnecessary sop at that. Maybe Obama also has a personal prejudice against him, but he should not let that get in the way of statesmanship.

That said, I think Obama has become so confused and disoriented, so disheartened?, by the violent and vehement opposition to him and hatred of him, that he is not thinking too clearly anymore. In this way I think the opposition to him has been counterproductive; he will be President for at least 3 more years; better they are good years than bad, even if it hurts one or the other party. The GOP is acting badly in this.
Reply By lecia lecia | about 1 month ago
he is a grown man who is not new to dirty politics, he is from chicago for gods sake, the most corrupt dirty political city in the usa. as i have told you before if he can not take the heat he should have never run for the damn office. quit making excuses for him like he is a lost little boy who is being picked on by the big bully gop and the evil angry american people
Posted By mllovric mllovric | about 1 month ago
President Obama doing what he did to appease China is unforgivable because he could have made a friendly greeting but not even that. There's
more to be friendly than brushing a suppressed people aside. You can be
friendly and have peace with both sides without allowing a dictatorial regime to tell you what to do. Australia is different in that way because
they greet the Dalai Lama and the government talks with him without any of
Chinese dictates because it is a country of free speech. 12/10/2009.
Reported by Redhanded101
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @4339896

Most Popular Reports

Related Tweets

Related Allvoices Reports

Related People

Contributions

Help and Accounts


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.