Congress is Destroying America
Linkedin

Congress is Destroying America

Boston : MA : USA | Oct 03, 2009 at 4:49 PM PDT
XX XX
Views: Pending
 
More Perspective - Opposing the Healthcare Plan

I do not think there could have been anything more difficult than to have been a Republican up for re-election in 2008. The party was in shambles and the Republicans were afraid of losing their seats because of the backlash against the Bush administration and their policies in Iraq. Republican Congress members worked night and day to distance themselves from the President.

The problem was, it backfired more than a old pickup truck with three big holes in its muffler. Republicans were so busy trying to prove they were not George W. Bush that they had no time left to say why. No ideas, no change – and certainly no path that would lead the nation anywhere but further into Iraq and Gitmo and Afghanistan and up the ying yangs of corporations and CEO's and lobbyists.

There was a worse fate than being viewed as a stand up man for George W. and that was to be labeled a stand up man for no one – and the Republican members of Congress did just that. The party lost a great number of seats and the American people branded the group of losers – and even the ones that won.... THE PARTY OF NO.

But did the Republicans learn from their mistakes? Absolutely not. They continued spiraling down this PARTY OF NO path right up until Barack Obama was sworn in as the 44th President of the United States of America. Obviously, they had yet to hear the Democrat majority skipping in the halls humming the happy tune by Johnny Mercer: ... "Accentuate the positive, eliminate the negative..." because if they had learned a few lessons along the way – it would have been that the American people, who were losing jobs and watching everything collapse, much preferred the positive humming of Democrats to the overture the Republican's chose which had no words and was used in the fabulous movie “JAWS” to signal the end for the poor naked swimmer.

You've got accentuate the positive/ Eliminate the negative / Latch on to the affirmative / Don't mess with Mr. In Between.

The Republican Party messed with Mr. In-Between so much they lost their voice to him.

Fortunately, if there is one solid foundation in our Congress it is this: They are all the same smug bunch of self righteous creeps. Democrats didn't learn from the mistakes of the Republicans or the mistakes many politicians made during the Bush years. They were so smitten with the new President and the tidal wave of support he brought (also known as the American people) that Democrats forgot who they worked for and they went right down the PATH OF NO with the (smaller in number now) Republican blow hards and in doing so – have quickly found out that the PARTY OF NO is perhaps the only thing in politics that will ever be bipartisan.

Now, I absolutely know that I'm going to get the "it's all irrelevant, it's all a part of the plan for the New World Order" comment, but I'm just not there yet... I still believe in the people in this country and I still believe we can re-brand the word NO into a much more potent word – like... "STOP!" I also believe that both sides of the fence (with the exception of me and my arch Allvoices nemesis) could sit down at a great big table – and start a whole new recipe for the advancement of our great country.

"“I'll give you health care for all citizens – but you need to throw out the coverage for illegals."

"I'll give you open competition for insurance companies but you'll need to throw in coverage for prescriptions."

"I'll give you funding for the masses, but you'll give me tax cuts for benefits paid by employees and employers."

"I'll give you coverage with no pre-existing conditions and you give me a suspension of capital gains for 11 years."

Could we mash it all up? Sure, and maybe we wouldn't come out of the first dinner party with anything but tomatoes on our face – but we'd at least have attempted our first recipe called the TRUE COMBINATION OF IDEAS.

I'm tired of the current status quo of our government. I don't really care for the sensationalism of Wilson OR Grayson and I abhor the hypocrisy of Pelosi and Boehner. Two peas in a pod...first thing we're putting in the stew... their seats.

Term limits should be expanded. They should restrict the number of years a person can serve not only as President but as a member of the House and as a member of the Senate. I'm not sure how many terms a Congress member should be allowed to serve but I do know that it's not working now and experience is not proving to be very effective. Barney Frank sure didn't become such a big blow hard by rolling out great new ideas and he didn't have any issue with the big fat donations coming in from everywhere when he pulled down the trophy called Chairman of the House Committee on Financial Services.

Term limits? Frank's been in office since 1980, and in that time all he managed to perfect was the art of bull shit. He was able to look straight into the eyes of the American people and tell them Frannie Mae and Freddie Mac were in no financial trouble just years before their collapse. He suggested oversight on the two companies would result in less affordable housing.

I choose Frank as an example – not because he's a Democrat, but because he is from my State where he is always re-elected with ease. He's done the American people no justice and had we had term limits of 15 or even 20 years for House members, he'd have been retired from office in 2000 and at that point – JUST MAYBE – a fresh set of eyes would have seen the inevitable doom forthcoming in the housing market and not have been tainted by corporate donations and lobbyists.

It's a pipe dream. But hey, one can only wonder what 20 years can do to a Congressman's ideas after he OR she has been wine and dined for decades by those horrible, huge corporations the American people place the blame on. Could it be that if we had term limits and true lobbying laws, perhaps these incredibly strong corporation-to-politician ties might not be allowed to become so strong that they suffocate the ethics of our national representatives?

I am not implying in any way that we can come out of this mess with some Utopian ideology but I would like to believe the American people can find their voice in the voter's box in 2010 and again in 2012 and that perhaps it's time to elect a whole new crew.

I do not like knowing that my children's future may be damper than the streets of London on a late March evening. I think it's time for CHANGE and I don't think either party is doing us any good right now by demonstrating the largest showing of partisanship than at any other time in this country. It's dividing our people and placing an ever larger crack right down the center of our Liberty Bell.

Our representatives were never suppose to link arm and arm with corporations and other countries. They were suppose to protect the people of the UNITED STATES. Our representatives were never suppose to become the elite of our country.

Somewhere along the way – our representatives have lost the pride in serving and taken up the gluttony of being served.

That's not change – that's just a voting mistake. We, the PEOPLE should put down the daggers and start demanding accountability and change in the current Congress.

We need stronger and clearer representation so that we can shape a future that we can ALL live with.... now, and 100 years from now.

Maryann

Maryann Scarangello is based in Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, and is an Anchor for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Posted By stillthinking stillthinking | over 3 years ago
WE need a strategy. To me it looks like a great deal of our problems have been caused by the cozy relationship of politicians, lobbyists, and the media machine.

The internet has allowed us commoners to knock a chink in their armor through sites like this one. With a little elbow grease, we can tear it wide open and let the disinfectant properties of sunshine do their work.

There's the "never vote for an incumbent" strategy, but that's a temporary fix at best. The new guy will likely be just as corrupt. For now, the best thing we can do is to keep posting on and reading sites like this, stay respectful towards each other and expose corruption wherever we can find it.

I for one, admire and respect an honest fellow citizen who opposes me on every single issue 100 times more than a slimy politician who says all the right things, but is bought and payed for by corporations and special interests.
Posted By ahol888 Adrian Holman | over 3 years ago
You are right about Congress. It feels like the way I am going to vote in 2010 is to listen to the candidates and choose the ones that sound less idiotic. I mean Congress is so horrible Sean Hannity is trying to get Lou Holtz to run every time he is on the show. And Lou Holtz has dropped some gems on ESPN like "The difference between danger and anger is the letter D." It seems like whichever political party has the majority uses that authority to undo the laws that were put in place when they were the minority in Congress.
Reply By Write4Life Maryann Scarangello | over 3 years ago
Lou Holtz - nice idea - I like that. He has a proven record of winning, of bringing opposing sides together for a common goal - I like it. NOW THAT is ithe kind of change I mean - Maybe not LOU, but why not people that are like him?

They exist in both parties...people that are not so vicious (I'm out) and people that can listen without out screaming (Grayson and Wilson are out) and people that don't force legislation that when the tide shifts forces the next round of candidates to change it (all of Congress is out.)
Posted By amalgam80 amalgam80 | over 3 years ago
I can't find one thing to disagree with in this article. I was just thinking about term limits, this whole week actually.

Your give and take statements were great, in my opinon I wanted the give parts and the take parts.

the only thing I would have problems with is the broad meaning of "no coverage for illegals", If that means I have to wait in an emergency room while bleeding to death while they check to see if I'm a citizen or not, no thank you, I'd rather they provide help to the illegals in emergency rooms, than me having to wait another however long it will take.

In India and Pakistan, when someone comes into the emergency room, that has been shot or in a car accident or anything else that may be criminal, they, or someone else needs to file a police report before most hospitals would offer them care.

There is no way, just no way I want anything similar to that happen.

I have no problem keeping the illegals out of the normal hospital situations, I don't care even if they are paying taxes, but in an emergency situation, I want to get treated asap.

So unless there is a quick(within seconds) way to check that I am legal, I would have to say, screw checking if I'm legal or not, get these god damn bullets out of me!

If you couldn't tell, I've been shot before.
Reply By Write4Life Maryann Scarangello | over 3 years ago
I don't think it's the ER we disagree on. If someone shows up and needs assistance at an ER - they need treatment and should get it. Then along with dismissal instructions - they should be excorted to the airport in my opinion - and put on a plane home - not given the instructions and let go. A doctor is required by LAW to call social services if they suspect abuse (as are teachers) so it could be the same - they are required to call immigration.) But again, that is one of the things we'll probably disagree on up front and why we won't come out of the first meeting with anything but tomotoes on our face.

People will argue this is a country of immigrants and I cannot disagree. However, when the borders were open - it was a different country and people had to really work to make it - the government didn't give handouts. When the borders tightened - we'd reached a population that no longer could support open borders. Now handouts are expected....and to some deserved, and to others - a waste of $$$.

The US should read Switzerland's nationalization process and it should be a lot like that here.
Posted By amalgam80 amalgam80 | over 3 years ago
Could you add that corporations and companies can not donate to any election or campaign whatsoever. They are not citizens of this country, they are freaking companies, their not even human. What do you think?

I don't mind CEOs wanting to donate, or anyone else, but as a prvate citizen, not as let's say Halliburton, or Microsoft, or here's the best one Goldman Sachs.

Companies should have no say in government, people should.


UP ARROW
Reply By Write4Life Maryann Scarangello | over 3 years ago
I agree - no business, foreign entity OR large sums by individuals should be put in forth in a way that either stops them completely- Corporations - or limits them significantly - individuals.

The amount of $$$ spent winning you over on the campaign trail is enough to blow your socks off. There should be a limit on that as well.

If it didn't break a person's bank account - more ethical people might be in the race - even at much much lower levels.

There's a reason people in MAssachusetts don't run against incumbants and is isn't just because it's a liberal state but rather that the person canonot compete with the massive donations given to the current (headlines) curruption down on our own Hill.
Reply By Write4Life Maryann Scarangello | over 3 years ago
Stinkthinking -

We saw that change this year, and that - whether or not you agree with all the arguing that took place - was a positive change. Incumbants fearing re-election talked to the people. One of the main problems was the partisanship - and maybe that was caused by going on "recess" with 5 drafts that did nothing but confused the populus. Not to mention -they were all thrown together too fast and not fully thought out.

Also - politicians should not be allowed to wine and dine on corporate dollars. And that includes the lifers who claim to want to reform this. (McCain.)

There was a show that was cancelled on Showtime called Brotherhood. It was about two brothers - one in the State LEgislature and the other in the Irish mob. For three seasons we watch the elected official go from good guy to a man absolutely no better than his Irish mobster brother and perhaps worse. Why? Because he committed his crime on the backs of Rhode Island citizens... all the while kissing babies and shaking hands and pretending to be above the cooruption that ran rampant behind closed doors.
Posted By Write4Life Maryann Scarangello | over 3 years ago
ONLY THE PEOPLE CAN CHANGE THE GOVERNMENT.

WE cannot expect or believe the government will do it. Their too content in their sweet pensions and cozy chairs.

REAL CHANGE MEANS THIS: If you bullsh** yourself into office - we'll show you the door next time around and if you've been there XXX many years in COngress(I say 10 is enough) pack up - you're done. Go on the speaking circuit.
Posted By firesisle Hardy Wright | over 3 years ago
Really liked this article! I've also enjoyed reading the comments; I think we can all see that the system is broken; another thing we might want to change is to eliminate some of the privileges that go with being an incumbent, such as the "franking" privilege, which allows incumbents in Congress to use the postal service for free. It's one of the reasons incumbents have such an advantage...
Reply By Write4Life Maryann Scarangello | over 3 years ago
Absolutely - why is that even happening? Just because you're an elected Republican you have the right to spam every Democrat in your district for FREE? Everyone - should pay the ticket of running for office from a preset amount of funds. And it should not be huge amounts either.

That would give us a Congress of diversity if a person who knows the Constitution and went to a State school and runs against a person who does not but is rich...right now there is a darn good chance the dude or dudette with the money will win...

That should change and could change with true campaign reform.

Imagine a Congress that actually represents the populus.
Posted By Renee616 Renee616 | over 3 years ago
i agree 100%
Posted By Redhanded101 Redhanded | over 3 years ago
The only way Conservatives will get back in power is if they start acting like Conservatives. I don't buy into this theory that Conservatives need to be more like Dmocrats or expouse more Democratic ideals. Democrats won by being Democrats. They did not win by reaching out Republicans or all of a suddne becoming more fiscally responsible. They won by appealing to their core of constituents the far left.

If and when Conservatives get back to their core values, they will win and win big. We don't need Conservative lite candidates like John McCain or Olympia Snow, we need to appeal to our core constituency.

We must stand for what keeps bringing us to the Dance. Tax Cuts, Strong Military,Free Market Solutions, Pro-Life, Pro-Gun Rights, Energy Independence and offshore drilling, and Supreme Court Justices that uphold the Constitution.

Once we start changing our ideals and values and become more like Democrats, we become one and the same.
Reply By Write4Life Maryann Scarangello | over 3 years ago
It's not that I disagree with you. What I would only add is that there are no true conservatives or for that matter any true politicians in Congress anymore. They all get in and spew their rhetoric and bend this way and that way - not for the sake of people or party, but for sake of $$$. That has to change.

I also think Congress exists to represent the country, and if the country leans closer to the right- new elections will reflect that, term limits will reflect that and policies will reflect that. Congress is the strongest voice of the American people.

The same would hold true on the opposite side too though...with limits and a shift in American thought - it would shift the reflection of Congress as it should.

As for me- I'm with you - we need a stronger defense, tax cuts, free markets, competition and less welfare reliance. I think we definitely need a nanny to kick some lazy a**, but definitely NOT a nanny state.

If there were term limits - Congress would reflect America. If there was a cap on corporate donations and campaign contributions we wouldn't have (I would hope) the rich aristocrats in Congress.

I think the tide is changing and I do think the election of Obama proves that. 1. People wanted change and 2. They got a lot more than they bargained for and 3. That's a good thing... brings people closer to their true values and last but not least - It has brought the good AND the bad front and center.
Posted By jongleur Mick Jerome | over 3 years ago
Maryann, Spot on! You're right that it is up to the American people to work together to solve the nation's problems and demand a stop--with our votes and vocal chords--to the congressional circus act that's been going on. I, too, have never seen such mean-spirited partisanship in my lifetime and the current status quo can no longer be tolerated.

Our public servants think we're here to serve them, keep our mouths shut, and just consume, consume, consume. Poppycock! Personally, I think we should throw them all out of office and start over fresh, and send greedy corporations to reform school by closing our pocketbooks to them.

We can all agree to disagree, but must collectively jump into action without wasting any more time. I appreciate the varied perspectives and conversations here on Allvoices and find that if we "check our egos at the door" we have more in common that most of us want to admit to. Maryann, thank you again for the great recipes to help save this country. Today's the perfect day to don our aprons and start cooking up a storm--together. Our children our counting on us!

- jongleur
Posted By ahol888 Adrian Holman | over 3 years ago
Actually, Linda McMahon, wife of WWE CEO Vince McMahon, is running in the Republican Primary for US Senate in Connecticut. That proves how bad Congress is; someone who promotes the fakest thing ever, pro wrestling, thinks that the Senate is out of control.
Reply By Write4Life Maryann Scarangello | over 3 years ago
I don't know - might solve the budget crisis if we let them gamble on outcomes...- put a big ring in the middle of the floor and anytime anyone gets out of line they have to get in the ring and square off w/Pelosi! That is enough to scare ANYONE!
Advertisement
 

News Stories

 
  • Democrats with guts | Sahil Kapur

    The Guardian
    Democrats with guts Congressman Alan Grayson's fighting talk gave Republicans a taste of their own bitter medicine on healthcare reform Democratic representative Alan Grayson speaking about healthcare reform. Photograph: C-Span Democratic...

Blogs

 >
  • Another Pundit: Devvy Kidd -- Where are the jobs congressman? I'll ...

    earlpundit.blogspot.com
    "While the president is in Copenhagen tomorrow,'' House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) said today, "the American people are going to wake up and find out that hundreds of thousands more Americans have lost their jobs. ... After the 2010
  • Art Levine: "Don't Get Sick": The Truth About GOP Health ...

    www.huffingtonpost.com
    It's been well over 100 days since House Republican leader John Boehner and other House GOP leaders promised to introduce their own legislation. The upshot of all the various plans, however, remains basically as Grayson described it: ... The miracle
  • Donklephant » Blog Archive » Question: Why Don't Conservatives ...

    donklephant.com
    Boehner is such a hack. So is Pelosi IMO. If the GOP gets Congress back, we will be replacing a bunch of Democratic hacks (Speaker, committee chairs etc) with a bunch of Republican hacks. Term limits are looking better all the time. ...

Videos

 >
 

More From Allvoices

Related People

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_110_event
 


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2013. All rights reserved.