The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

White House Split on Afghanistan

By: airwlf405 send a private message
Washington : DC : USA | about 1 month ago  
Views: 91
  • White House Meeting on Afghanistan
    White House Meeting on Afghanistan
    Posted by: airwlf405
    White House photo by Pete Souza
  • Afghanistan
    Afghanistan
    Posted by: airwlf405
    US Troops in Afghanistan
White House Meeting on Afghanistan

Wednesdays meeting in the situation room sparked a crucial debate on which direction the President should follow for the future of our troops in Afghanistan.

WASHINGTON - In a meeting Wednesday President Barack Obama sat down with Vice President Biden, cabinet secretaries and generals along with his adviser's and Intelligence chiefs in order to chart a new course for the war in Afghanistan.

The three hour meeting yielded one major agreement which was none of the choices will be easy.

Only six months ago the President announced in his words "a stronger, smarter and comprehensive strategy" for Afghanistan and it's neighbor Pakistan although yesterdays meeting was an effort to if necessary alter but most importantly clarify the mission in Afghanistan for the future.

To stay with his plan he laid out in March the President may need to consider a call for as many as 40 thousand more troops by General McChrystal as he warns that unless provided with more forces and an even more robust counterinsurgency strategy, the war in Afghanistan is most likely lost. The counterinsurgency strategy the General calls for would emphasize the protection of civilians before the engagement insurgents, reducing air strikes in order to minimize the risk of civilian casualties and to expand the training of Afghan security forces.

Another option is a plan offered by Vice President Joseph Biden in which in his plan he advocates using fewer troops while focusing the main effort on hunting down the leaders of Al Qaeda although without a troop increase Biden's plan is feared by some could possibly lead to the collapse of the Afghan government.

The dilemma President Obama faces is that there may be no good options at this point and to continue along the same path taken for the past eight years could possibly leave our military in a quagmire for the unforeseen future.

Amongst the calls from some on the left to cut loses and bring our troops home along with some on the right advocating the continuation of the war until a yet to be defined victory is achieved the President finds himself in a situation that very few if any would envy.

Wednesday's meeting is the first of five meetings planed for President Obama and his adviser's to rethink the strategy while also reviewing the declining political and security situation found today in Afghanistan. According to an administration official as reported by The Wall Street Journal the President "focused his questioning on the current threat posed by Al Qaeda and whether a resurgent Taliban would give Al Qaeda leaders a new haven to regroup."

Defense Secretary Gates "now worries that counterinsurgency might no longer be a viable approach for countering the Taliban violence roiling once-stable parts of north and west Afghanistan" a senior defense official said in an interview Wednesday with The Wall Street Journal.

With his thinking seemingly evolving, it still remains to be seen if Secretary Gates will move more towards the Vice President's push to go with a "counter-terror" strategy replacing the counterinsurgency approach. Although as of yesterday according to Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell who said Mr. Gates "remains opposed to such a strategy" and "does not think that is a path to success in Afghanistan."

Which ever way the President decides to proceed critics on both sides say the worst option of all would be is to stay the course and adopt some version of the status quo.

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon

Related Allvoices Contributions

News Stories
 
  • News Source: Channel NewsAsia | about 1 month ago
    A top White House adviser said on Sunday Afghanistan is in no imminent danger of falling to the Taliban and dismissed concern the group's resurgence could fuel a renewed Al-Qaeda sanctuary there. "I don't foresee the return of the Taliban and I want...
  • News Source: Jang.com.pk | about 1 month ago
    Jones� comments came in the backdrop of a successful Pakistani campaign against the Taliban militants in Swat and other northwestern areas and amidst reports of an expected major offensive against the militants hiding in Waziristan tribal area...
  • News Source: International Herald Tribune | about 1 month ago
    Jones , said on Sunday that a recommendation to send another 40,000 American troops to Afghanistan was just one part of a review of overall strategy that included such factors as a larger role for the Pakistani military and the integrity of the...
  • News Source: Sky News | about 1 month ago
    His comment comes as the coalition commander in Afghanistan , US General Stanley McChrystal, is requesting up to 40,000 additional troops. Gen McChrystal's plan is reported to have met with a cool reception in Washington where Vice President Joe...
  • News Source: Arizona Republic | about 1 month ago
    President Barack Obama is considering a range of ideas for changing course in Afghanistan, from pulling back to staying put to sending thousands more troops to fight the insurgency. A look at the options and their implications for achieving Obama's...
  • News Source: Russia Today | about 1 month ago
    Meanwhile, President Barack Obama, Vice President Joseph Biden and the US government are devising a new strategy for Afghanistan. Whether to add more troops and whether to focus on counter-insurgency or counter-terrorism is being discussed.
Blogs
 >
  • Blog Source: www.digitaljournal.com
    Defense Secretary Gates "now worries that counterinsurgency might no longer be a viable approach for countering the Taliban violence roiling once-stable parts of north and west Afghanistan" a senior defense official said in an interview ...
  • Blog Source: the44diaries.wordpress.com
    ... a senior defense official said that Defense Secretary Robert Gates now worries that counterinsurgency might no longer be a viable approach for countering the Taliban violence roiling once-stable parts of north and west Afghanistan. ...
  • Blog Source: www.washingtonexaminer.com
    Obama weighs a dramatic shift in his approach to Afghan war. By: Julie Mason Examiner White House Correspondent October 1, 2009. As President Obama weighs his options for the future mission in Afghanistan, his options include -- but are not ...
  • Blog Source: www.truthout.org
    Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Secretary of Defence Robert Gates and Afghanistan coordinator Richard Holbrooke supported the military's proposal, however. In the end, Obama compromised with the military, approving 17000 of the 30000 ... But the
  • Blog Source: elitestv.com
    Morrell declined to reveal in which direction Gates was leaning, but he did say that Gates previously has disagreed with a plan to largely reduce the US presence in Afghanistan and instead wage a counterinsurgency effort involving small ...
  • Blog Source: www.paxmundi.info
    obstacles to the success of a counter-insurgency war in Afghanistan that it could be seen as an invitation to the president to reject the strategy. Both leaking such a relatively bleak assessment and requesting 40000 more troops may ...
Images
 >
 
Videos
 >
 
Posted By northsunm32 northsunm32 | about 1 month ago
Obama during his campaign and early afterwards was gung-ho for making the war in Afghanistan a major policy initiative with increased drone attacks and more troops. The liberal left followed him and even considered him an anti-war candidate. But both before and after his campaign his policy in Afghanistan has been even more aggressive than that of Bush. Now that policy is blowing back and will blow back even more if he follows McChrystal's advice. Already the US public is turning against the war for one main reason: increasing U.S. casualties.
If there are more US troops sent to Afghanistan and they try to keep and hold territory and protect the population this can only mean a many fold increase in U.S. casualties. This in turn will mean an even further decline in support for the war. To adequately take and hold the entire country even on McChrystal's calculations would take hundreds of thousands of troops over a number of years. Even now McChrystal is withdrawing from some sparsely populated areas leaving havens for the Taliban. The only way that Obama could reduce casualties is through returning to an earlier strategy or withdrawing troops but if he does this he will face withering criticism from the right. This might be the least harmful result however. If Obama sends more troops he will have the support of many right wing Republicans but will lose support from many Democrats and as casualties increase all but hard core hawks.
Posted By airwlf405 airwlf405 | about 1 month ago
There is no doubt he has a tough decision to make and your right he is between a rock and a hard place but he also has to worry about the Independents.

If he decides to pull out and the Taliban take back over with Bin Laden close behind, he'll get blamed for losing the war both by the Right and some Independents. If he decides to increase the troop level even more the rise in casualties will lose him most of his base along with a lot of Independents.

Whatever he decides he definitely needs to make sure the hunt for Bin Laden keeps going until we get that Son of a Bitch!
Reported by airwlf405
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @4283004

Most Popular Reports

Related Tweets

Related Allvoices Reports

Related People

Contributions

Help and Accounts


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.