The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

Scientists and environmentalists: US Boxer-Kerry climate bill just doesn't cut it

Princeton : WV : USA | about 1 month ago  
Views: 1,521
  • cyclone image
    cyclone image
    Posted by: DelilahStarling
    Cyclone image by thinkquest.org
  • Melting glaciers
    Melting glaciers
    Posted by: DelilahStarling
    Melting glaciers of Cape York Greenland
  • Northern Lights
    Northern Lights
    Posted by: DelilahStarling
    Climate aberrations create visual affects in Northern Lights National ...
cyclone image

WASHINGTON, D.C.— The Center for Biological Diversity issued the following statement today from Executive Director Kieran Suckling, responding to a close-to-final version of the Senate climate bill released today.

“The Boxer-Kerry climate bill marks a baby step forward in the ever more urgent fight against climate catastrophe, but much bolder action is needed.

“We applaud senators Boxer and Kerry for introducing legislation that builds on the success of the Clean Air Act. The Clean Air Act has reduced air pollution for 40 years and is one of our most powerful tools in fighting global warming and protecting human health. This legislation recognizes that now more than ever, we need every tool in the tool box to curb global warming, and it retains the safety net of the Clean Air Act to reduce greenhouse emissions.

“While the Senate bill recognizes the absolute necessity of stronger emissions reduction targets, the targets in the Senate bill — like those in the House bill — are woefully inadequate. This legislation would not save the polar bear and numerous other species and ecosystems because it simply does not go far enough quickly enough.

“The scientific consensus is clear: We must reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide to no more than 350 parts per million. Leading climate scientists have called for reductions of approximately 40 percent below 1990 levels to avoid climate catastrophe, and yet this bill aims to deliver only a 20-percent reduction from 2005 levels.”

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has found that to reach even 450 ppm CO2eq (corresponding to approximately 400 ppm CO2), the emissions of the United States and other developed countries should be reduced by 25 to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2020.1 Thus, to reach 350 ppm CO2, the United States must achieve or exceed the upper end of this range.

Forty of the world’s leading climate scientists, including former IPCC chair Sir John Houghton, have called for industrialized countries to make a commitment at the United Nations climate summit in Copenhagen to cut carbon emissions to at least 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2020 “to avoid the worst impacts of climate change.”

The Center for Biological Diversity is advocating for legislation that sets an overall cap on atmospheric carbon dioxide levels consistent with the best available science of no more than 350 ppm, which would require reducing emissions approximately 40 to 45 percent below 1990 levels; that works with, rather than replaces, the Clean Air Act; and that eliminates or greatly reduces offsets and other loopholes.

# # #

The Center for Biological Diversity is a national, nonprofit conservation organization with more than 225,000 members and online activists dedicated to the protection of endangered species and wild places.

Contact: Bill Snape, Center for Biological Diversity, (202) 536-9351, bsnape@biologicaldiversity.org

1 Gupta, S. et al. 2007: Policies, Instruments and Co-operative Arrangements. In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, B. Metz et al, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA at 776.

***Source: press release from Center of Biological Diversity. No Copyright restrictions

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon

Related Allvoices Contributions

News Stories
 
  • News Source: NewKerala | about 1 month ago
    But without prompt action, they found, extreme changes could soon become much more difficult, if not impossible, to control. According to Ron Prinn, co-director of MIT�s Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change and a co-author of...
  • News Source: The New York Times | about 1 month ago
    President Obama ’s top aide on climate and energy said Friday that there was virtually no chance that Congress would have a climate and energy bill ready for him to sign before international negotiations begin in December in Copenhagen on a global...
  • News Source: Reuters | about 1 month ago
    President Barack Obama is unlikely to sign climate legislation ahead of a U.N. global warming meeting in Copenhagen that starts in early December, the White House's top climate and energy coordinator said on Friday. "We'd like to be (finished with)...
  • News Source: NewKerala | about 1 month ago
    Only one in 10 describe the US as a partner. "From our side, it has been difficult to build trust with Pakistan's military and intelligence services over the years because our interests have not always been aligned and because ties between the ISI...
  • News Source: Androscoggin News | about 1 month ago
    There were more developments in the realm of climate change legislation south of the border, as Senators Barbara Boxer and John Kerry tabled the latest version before the Senate. This round is called the Clean Energy Jobs and America Power Act and...
  • News Source: Washington Post | about 1 month ago
    Chairman of the Senator Foreign Relations Committee and someone who has his hand on every major piece of legislation before the Senate this fall...You and your colleague from California, Senator Boxer, have introduced the long-awaited version of the...
Blogs
 >
  • Blog Source: forteanzoology.blogspot.com
    But we'll have to do a lot better than the inadequate House-passed bill -- we must get to work now, both nationally and internationally, to reduce our atmospheric CO2 to 350 ppm or below. ... Founder and director of the Center for Race, Poverty, and
  • Blog Source: www.openmarket.org
    Then there's the 350 or Bust campaign led by the Center for Biological Diversity. CBD and its comrads demand that U.S. environmental statutes be “fully implemented” to lower CO2 concentrations to 350 ppm. In June, CBD issued a report ... They
  • Blog Source: www.climatesciencewatch.org
    A recent study projecting the impacts of climate change on the pattern of marine biodiversity suggests dramatic changes to come. Ecosystems in sub-polar waters, the tropics and semi-enclosed seas are predicted to suffer numerous ...
  • Blog Source: spudfanblog.blogspot.com
    Biological diversity. Shame on us. With the extinction rate having risen to somewhere between 100 times and a 1000 times above natural levels, our collective performance on this eco-boundary is pitiful. We are many multiples past the safety limit ...
  • Blog Source: e360.yale.edu
    They concluded that there was good evidence for nine kinds of thresholds: climate change, ocean acidity, the ozone layer, freshwater use, the movement of nitrogen and phosphorus, the amount of land used for crops, aerosols (haze and ... The authors
  • Blog Source: www.cleanenergy-project.de
    These include: climate change, stratospheric ozone, land use change, freshwater use, biological diversity, ocean acidification, nitrogen and phosphorus inputs to the biosphere and oceans, aerosol loading and chemical pollution. ... One boundary that
Images
 >
 
Videos
 >
 
Posted By InspectorGadget InspectorGadget | about 1 month ago
Apparently they're not taking the issue as seriously as they should be taking it. If those are the statistics and the goals scientists are suggesting, than those should be the goals and statistics in the bill. It's better than nothing, but the problem is so massive that we can't afford to take it easy and aim low.
Posted By Changez Changez | about 1 month ago
Delilah, while this bill may not encompass or address all the measures that are required we must remember that it is a step forward and that politics is the art of the possible. Simply put the political atmosphere is not conducive to passing a more stringent bill at this time and the environmental lobby and conservation scientists must work to keep building on the incremental process. By crying wolf we only alienate sections of the public that are more concerned with other matters. This is an incremental process and every bill to reduce emissions or increase environmental protection should be supported at the stage it is in and then built upon as public and political opinion can be swayed Simply lets work with what we have and then make it better.
Posted By ahol888 ahol888 | about 1 month ago
Anything with Sen. Barbara Boxer's name on it will not work. Period.
Posted By WHiPCPL WHiPCPL | about 2 hours ago
i agree it won't help anything
Reported by DelilahStarling
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @4269096

Most Popular Reports

Related Tweets

Related Allvoices Reports

Related People

Contributions

Help and Accounts


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.