The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

US Anti-Missile Defence Will Also Suffer From New Obama Policy

Budapest : Hungary | 2 months ago  
Views: 789
  • Titan Missile
    Titan Missile
    Posted by: ChristopherSzabo
    This decomissioned Titan missile in its launch silo was taken by Telstar ...
Titan Missile

Closing down the anti-ballistic missile shield for Europe by the Obama administration has raised hackles in Central and Eastern Europe, and in Republican circles in the US. What is forgotten is the missile shield was also part of the defence of the United States.

The deep-penetration X-Band radar in the Czech Republic and the 10 anti-ballistic missiles scheduled for Poland were also part of the defence of the US eastern seaboard against a nuclear attack, according to the Wall Street Journal.

The article pointed out that ground-based interceptors in Alaska and California counter threats to the US West coast, such as that posed by North Korea. Such interceptors are not installed on the East Coast and the Central European sites were to have been the “third leg” of the new anti-ballistic defence system, adding an additional layer to defending such US cities as Washington and New York against attacks by a nuclear-armed Iran.

President Barack Obama’s new plan, that of stationing Aegis missile-carrying ships off Europe is only aimed at protected the continent from medium-range missiles fired from Iran. Should either Iran or, at some stage, Russia, fire Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) at America, their chance of striking key East Coast cities would be greatly enhanced.

Meanwhile, the New York Times revealed why Russia was so dead-set against the missile shield. The X-Band radar in the Czech Republic could have covered large areas of European Russia, thus preventing Russia from moving troops or missiles around unnoticed. The newspaper also wondered whether the climbdown by President Obama would be enough to satisfy the Russians? Russia has not agreed to any quid pro quo for the removal of the system, and has reserved the right to criticise the new one.

The Wall Street Journal raised expressed another concern about the perceived betrayal of America’s allies. If the US could promise to keep Poland and the Czech Republic covered by a missile shield today and break that promise tomorrow, perhaps it would not be wise to trust it by other US allies, the article said.

Japan has already said it could build nuclear missiles in a short time, and some analysts believe Obama’s new policy will create a new nuclear arms race involving Japan (against North Korea), Egypt and Saudi Arabia (against Iran) and of course, Israel reportedly already has nuclear arms.

Perhaps today’s headline “Obama Has Betrayed Central Europe” in the Hungarian newspaper Magyar Hírlap was not so far off, after all.

It could be he has betrayed more than that.

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon

Related Allvoices Contributions

News Stories
 
  • News Source: Sydney Morning Herald | 2 months ago
    promoted by Obama's predecessor George W. Bush -- to place a radar facility in the Czech Republic and interceptor rockets in Poland. A Kremlin source said on Friday Russia would offer compromises in response to the US policy change, amid speculation...
  • News Source: Sify News | 2 months ago
    President Barack Obama's decision to scrap a Bush-era missile intercept system in Europe was based largely on a new U.S. Iran's effort to build a nuclear-capable long-range missile would take three years to five years longer than originally thought,...
  • News Source: Christian Science Monitor | 2 months ago
    With President Barack Obama facing Republican charges that backing off a missile shield in eastern Europe is appeasing Russia and abandoning Poland, European officials are strongly applauding the American decision. German and French diplomats see the...
  • News Source: Sify News | 2 months ago
    The Obama administration's revamped plan for a European missile shield is part of a broad new strategy for squeezing Iran. The plan has upset some loyal allies with its appeal to Russia. Yet if the new approach pans out, using more diverse defenses...
  • News Source: GMA News | 2 months ago
    Russia has scrapped a plan to deploy missiles in a region near Poland after President Barack Obama dumped the Bush-era plan for a U.S. missile defense in Eastern Europe, a Russian deputy defense minister said Saturday. Vladimir Popovkin told Ekho...
  • News Source: Fox News | 2 months ago
    Missile Pivot The Obama administration's scrapping of long-range missile interceptors in Europe came down to money. The Obama administration's scrapping of long-range missile interceptors in Europe wasn't just about security and diplomacy, according...
Blogs
 >
  • Blog Source: thebridge.typepad.com
    One of those threats is the danger posed by ballistic missiles. As I said during the campaign, President Bush was right that Iran's ballistic missile program poses a significant threat. And that's why I'm committed to deploying strong missile defense
  • Blog Source: washingtonindependent.com
    According to a Pentagon fact sheet on the now-scrapped plans for a missile shield in Poland and the Czech Republic, Defense Secretary Bob Gates and the Joint Chiefs of Staff “unanimously” agreed to get rid of the shield in favor of ... Starting
  • Blog Source: www.realclearpolitics.com
    This new approach will provide capabilities sooner, build on proven systems, and offer greater defenses against the threat of missile attack than the 2007 European missile defense program. This decision was guided by two principal ...
  • Blog Source: lornakismet.wordpress.com
    “We have now the opportunity to deploy new sensors and interceptors in northern and southern Europe that near term can provide missile defense coverage against more immediate threats from Iran or others,” he said. “Those who say we are
  • Blog Source: www.vancouverite.com
    The controversial defence shield was thought unnecessary by many U.S. allies who disbelieved the assessment that the American homeland was directly threatened by Iranian ballistic missiles. ... will feature deployments of increasingly- capable sea-
  • Blog Source: blog.usni.org
    Applying that philosophy to the fallout from the Presidents decision to change the approach for an Eastern European ballistic missile defense shield, In note both the size and scope globally of the political response. ... The biggest challenge in the
Images
 >
 
Videos
 >
 
Posted By jmsjoin jmsjoin | 2 months ago
Hi Christopher
Nothing can be farther from the truth! We use to totally mobile proven aegis right now. It is already for medium and shorty rang missiles and can be relocated at a moments notice anywhere around the world. Long range ICBM capabilities are well under way.
Robert Gates was Bush's defense secretary too!He too says it is a great idea and you have to believe he kowtowed to Bush the wrongheaded sole decider. Russia and NATO have even been invited to share in it and Moscow shelved their own plans. All bias aside this is a great development!
Posted By jmsjoin jmsjoin | 2 months ago
Hi Christopher
Nothing can be farther from the truth! We use to totally mobile proven aegis right now. It is already for medium and shorty rang missiles and can be relocated at a moments notice anywhere around the world. Long range ICBM capabilities are well under way.
Robert Gates was Bush's defense secretary too!He too says it is a great idea and you have to believe he kowtowed to Bush the wrongheaded sole decider. Russia and NATO have even been invited to share in it and Moscow shelved their own plans. All bias aside this is a great development!
Posted By jmsjoin jmsjoin | 2 months ago
Hi Christopher
Nothing can be farther from the truth! We use to totally mobile proven aegis right now. It is already for medium and shorty rang missiles and can be relocated at a moments notice anywhere around the world. Long range ICBM capabilities are well under way.
Robert Gates was Bush's defense secretary too!He too says it is a great idea and you have to believe he kowtowed to Bush the wrongheaded sole decider. Russia and NATO have even been invited to share in it and Moscow shelved their own plans. All bias aside this is a great development!
Posted By jmsjoin jmsjoin | 2 months ago
Hi Christopher
Nothing can be farther from the truth! We use to totally mobile proven aegis right now. It is already for medium and shorty rang missiles and can be relocated at a moments notice anywhere around the world. Long range ICBM capabilities are well under way.
Robert Gates was Bush's defense secretary too!He too says it is a great idea and you have to believe he kowtowed to Bush the wrongheaded sole decider. Russia and NATO have even been invited to share in it and Moscow shelved their own plans. All bias aside this is a great development!
Posted By ChristopherSzabo ChristopherSzabo | 2 months ago
Hi,
By putting your case four times, I take it you're really trying to make a point. But you don't know the Russians. They have already accepted that their foreign policy has scored a major victory. What is next? They will go after small NATO countries like the Baltic States and NATO allies like Georgia.
In short, the technical missile aspect is only part of it. Considering your opponents more important than your actual allies is not a wise move. Think about Poland. It has one of the biggest contingents in Afghanistan. Now, why should they stay there?
And as to the Aegis systems being mobile, that's just the problem. An Aeigis cruiser can be parked in the Eastern Med to protect us one minute, but it can be sent off to fight pirates the next.
You call this an alliance? You see, the administration should remember that alliances are two way streets, not something that's there for its convenience.
The US has lost an enormous amount of credibility, I'm sad to say.

Cheers
Reported by ChristopherSzabo
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @4183960

Most Popular Reports

Related Tweets

Related Allvoices Reports

Related People

Contributions

Help and Accounts


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.