The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

Ho, Ho – No?: New Curriculum May Remove Christmas, Rosh Hashanah, Add Diwali

Austin : TX : USA | 2 months ago  
Views: 2,433
  • Happy Holidays
    Happy Holidays
    Posted by: vernoncrumrine
    www.morguefile.com by mantasmagorical
Happy Holidays

September 15, 2009

The Texas State Board of Education is currently in the process of revising portions of its social studies curriculum. At present, Texas sixth-graders are required by curriculum guidelines to learn about Christian, Jewish, and Muslim holidays in a world studies course.

A defining document called TEKS, Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills for grades K-12 within the social studies curriculum contains a proposal that two existing holidays now included in the curriculum be removed and that a new holiday be added.

Under the current curriculum, sixth graders must now be able to explain the significance of two Christian holidays, the Muslim holy month and two Jewish holidays. Those holidays are: Christmas and Easter (Christian), Ramadan (Muslim) and Yom Kippur and Rosh Hashanah (Jewish).

The new TEA proposal calls for removing both Christmas and Rosh Hashanah holidays from the current curriculum listing of holidays now listed for study by sixth-graders, adding a Hindu holiday, Diwali. It should be noted here that Diwali is also celebrated by some Buddhists.

The TEA committee recommending these changes says that only one key holiday from each of world’s five major religions would henceforth be listed under the revised sixth-grade social studies curriculum if the proposed changes are ultimately adopted. That would mean that students would in the future study and explain the significance of Easter (Christian), Ramadan (Muslim), Yom Kippur (Jewish) and Diwali (Hindu and Buddhism) holidays.

Some critics have argued that these proposed changes constitute a "war on Christmas", while defenders of the curriculum change cite the real need for expanding student’s knowledge of world religions.

Those who do not approve of the proposed changes to the curriculum point out that the Christian, Jewish and Muslim religions collectively make up the majority percentage of religious beliefs held by Americans. They also contend that dropping the Christmas and Rosh Hashanah holidays might mislead students as to their importance.

However, the other side of the issue regards the proposed changes as being a valuable lesson in cultural diversity as well as a further realization of the promise of freedom of religion for all.

Since selected other states often adopt some of the curriculum guidelines that are put into place by the state of Texas, some states other than Texas could ultimately also be affected by the proposed changes, even though for the moment, the issue remains squarely centered on Texas and its State Board of Education.

Your informal feedback either in support of or in opposition to these first draft TEA committee recommendations may be filed via email through October 9, 2009 with the Texas State Board of Education. You should address any comments you may have to teks@tea.state.tx.us.

Please be sure to indicate the course or grade level you are responding to in the subject line of your email. In the proposal by the TEA to strike both Christmas and Rosh Hashanah holidays and to add the Diwali holiday as discussed in this article, your subject line should read "Proposed Curriculum - 6th-Grade Social Studies World Religion".

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon
News Stories
 
  • News Source: International Business Times | 2 months ago
    Friday at sunset will mark the beginning of the Jewish New Year, or known to the Jewish community as Rosh Hashanah , the start of year 5,770 for the Jewish community. The New Year will begin with special prayers and lighting special candles.
  • News Source: The Dallas Morning News | 2 months ago
    Neil Armstrong, Daniel Boone, the state capitals – and even Christmas. All are going back into the state curriculum standards for social studies, State Board of Education members decided Thursday. Meeting with several writing teams for social...
  • News Source: Houston Chronicle | 2 months ago
    Christmas will stay in Texas textbooks, State Board of Education members said Thursday while reviewing early recommendations for new social studies standards. The board will not approve the new curriculum standards for public schools until next year,...
  • News Source: Iowa City Press-Citizen | 2 months ago
    Unlike the secular year, where the New Year is celebrated with a �lot of hoopla,� the start of the Jewish New Year is a time for pure introspection. Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year, starts Friday and ends 10 days later with Yom Kippur, said...
  • News Source: United Press International | 2 months ago
    The debate over the curriculum standards to be used by Texas public schools has intensified regarding religion's role in such efforts, an expert says. Messiah College history professor John Fea said the State Board of Education discussion scheduled...
  • News Source: Disinfo.com | 2 months ago
    FaithWorld, Religion Clause, and Religion Dispatches all point to a newly-released poll from Public Religion Research and the Bliss Institute of Applied Politics that compares conservative and progressive/liberal religious activists.
  • Posted By Sherrill_Fulghum Sherrill_Fulghum | 2 months ago
    Rosh Hashannah and Yom Kippur are both a part of the High Holidays and should be taught in conjunction with each other and not considered two separate holidays.
    And what's wrong teaching each holiday, no matter what religion, as it comes along, even if it is something as simple as writing about the holiday while the students are taking advantage of the off time?
  • Reply By firesisle firesisle | 2 months ago
    I like your idea, and you're absolutely right about Yom Kippur and Rosh Hashannah... they're so interconnected you can't teach about one without teaching about the other.

    I think secular studies about religious history and practice are fine, and encourage the acceptance of diversity...
  • Reply By Changez Changez | 2 months ago
    Why are they taught anythiNG about the religious significance of these days in any case. They should simply be taught the history of it and separately whaT the cultural and significance is of these days, or holidays, but not even in a separate class. It should just be a part of history lessons: 'and in AD 3 Jesus christ, a major reformer etc. was born. We place his date of birth as 25th December and many Christians celebrate that day as Christmas. In Ad 710 Muhammad, a man from the Arabian town of Mecca claimed he received revelation. That happened in the month of Ramadan and many muslims celebrate that month as special etc."

    And if it comes to that I agree with Sherril that it shouldn't be a big deal to try and balance all these religions, let what is already there stay, it sounds stupid to remove Christmas just to be PC and if you want to expand then do that, though expanding in an explanation of what Diwali is might get really long, because there's a whole system of mythology for that.
  • Posted By Melissa_Newman Melissa_Newman | 2 months ago
    This is the main reason why religions should not be taught in public schools. I believe the idea of teaching students about different kinds of religions around the world is a great idea but Is this class a requirement for students to take or is it an elective? If it's a elective then it might not be such a big deal. Maybe it should be the teachers decision what to teach throughout the year?
  • Reply By Ross1776 Ross1776 | 2 months ago
    I disagree. The schools are teaching the history of the holidays, not religion. And there is a difference.

    And atheism is not a religion at all. Whereas we have "freedom of" not "freedom from" specially mentioned, and a Creator in our founding documents.

    So why don't the atheists start their own then "God free" schools, since all public education in the founders day actually was held at local churches, using the Bible as reading material?

    And that is historic truth.
  • Posted By Ross1776 Ross1776 | 2 months ago
    Does seem when the government gets involved in education in this amount and degree, rather than this being determined by the local school boards and parents themselves as was the intent of our founders for public education in this country, more and more complications arise.

    Why is the state so inordinately involved in this rather than the parents and local school communities? And freedom of religion was not intended to be freedom from religion at all, so if there are any that oppose at least a cursory underlining of the religious holidays taught from a merely historic perspective, which is what those events really are also, after all, than why is there such a to do over some of this nonsense?
  • Reply By CHEXMIX CHEXMIX | 2 months ago
    I disagree with you on some points. I think state governments should regulate education. I'm not sure about how I feel about them having their hand in setting curriculum. Their the ones giving standardized tests, so perhaps they should set curriculum. Otherwise, you'd have a bunch of different school districts teaching different things, and kids in the state aren't necessarily equally prepared. If that student enters a different district, they might not be in the right level math, and will be ill prepared for the next school they go to. I think having the state do it sets a standard for each district to follow to the benefit of the kids. On the other hand, why not have recommended curriculum submitted to the district and a represenatative from each district decide upon committe what will be the state curriculum and then enforced by the state. That sounds like a good idea to me. I'm not sure how Texas does it.

    As for arguments about what the founders intended. The founders were mostly slave owners that never intended for black people to be citizens, therefore excluding black children to even go to public schools. An African slave would be lynched for being caught reading a book. The Constitution, riddled with amendments to make it inclusive of all, and founders intentions are not always the best argument for your cause.

    I also disagree with the notion that freedom of religion was not freedom from religion. That's your interpretation, but I interpret it as freedom from and freedom of religion. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.." It sounds pretty explicit to me.
  • Reply By Melissa_Newman Melissa_Newman | 2 months ago
    I do agree about this kind of course being taught in public schools but I agree with Changez. It should be more the about history and different world cultures around the world. Why are they only focusing on the holidays? I think that anything religious in school only brings out people being too sensitive about the subject such as in this case where people are angry that they are removing Christmas. It shouldn't be a big deal that they are changing it, but religion is a sensitive subject. If we left religion out of schools then no one would have to complain about it.
  • Posted By ahol888 ahol888 | 2 months ago
    If the schools honor all of these holidays like Christams and Easter with time off, then there will not be much time for children to learn anything.
  • Posted By AnneHart AnneHart | 2 months ago
    I'd like to learn more about Buddhist/Hindu Diwali. It was never mentioned in the schools or newspapers in the last 60 years I've been reading newspapers. In public school in the 1950s no religion was mentioned, but we did sing hymns in auditorium that would fit all religions at all holidays because they were about universal kindness.
  • Posted By CHEXMIX CHEXMIX | 2 months ago
    I don't see what the problem is. I have a problem with public schools teaching from a particular religious perspective, but I think it's quite progressive of Texas to focus on cultural diversity. It sounds like these schools are teaching about the social and historical significance of each holiday as it relates to people of different ethinc and religous backgrounds around the world. I don't have a problem with that. The first time I ever took a religious studies class was in college. So Texas is ahead of the curve. I also don't have a problem with including Hinduism. If the focus is diversity, people shouldn't be hindered by what's most popular in American culture. That's more of a reason to include less popular religions in this class. Social studies is a broad class that covers very many different subjects, not just this religous segment. My guess is they simply don't have the time to accomodate all religions, and really, some religions are always going to be excluded because there are probably hundreds of religions out there. I don't think it's an assault on Christianity, but rather a compromise to accomodate another religion that the kids might not know about, as Christianity is pretty popular and I would guess most Americans do know the significance of Christmas.

    I will agree with Melissa as far as saying that if people are going to be so angry about the decision to accommodate another religion and people can't agree, than we should treat them like 3 year olds and scrap the unit entirely. Of course that would be to the detriment of the students.
  • Reply By Changez Changez | 2 months ago
    I agree...It seems like a progressive step for Texas (of all places) to take. They should just not make a big deal out of it and teach these things like normal topics in other subjects. It is the media focus and frenzy that makes big deals out of small things that are not problems.
  • Reported by vernoncrumrine
    Report Your News Got a similar story?
    Add it to the network!

    Or add related content to this report

    Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @4159485

    Most Popular Reports

    Related Tweets

    Related People

    Contributions

    Help and Accounts


    Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

    © Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.