The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

WARNING!! Deadly Nano Particles Detected in Swine Flu Vaccine - Public Must Demand Criminal Investigation

By: muzikdiva send a private message
Glendale : CA : USA | 2 months ago  
Views: 97

The plot thickens to the point of a SciFi thriller on the swine flu vaccine. Not only are we dealing with the possibility of forced mandatory vaccinations, to rumors of our children being bussed out from schools for mass vaccinations and claims of whistle blowers being arrested on false charges of threatening to bomb Obama. This story couldn't be written better, now it appears that deadly nano particles have been detected in swine flu vaccines.

The following article is by a well respected author William Engdahl, he's an award winning journalist who's not going to risk his reputation on misinformation, lies or propaganda. This is some rather technical information that would be hard to effectively interpret, those who have been following my articles know my opinion and viewpoint on taking the jab. The most effective manner of avoiding the flu is by boosting your immune system with vitamin d, ImmuneExtra, omega 3 fish oils and other nutritional and herbal supplements.

Nano Particles used in Untested H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines Part III: ‘It’s the vaccines, Stupid!
By F. William Engdahl
Global Research, September 13, 2009

Vaccines which have been approved by the responsible government authorities for vaccination against the alleged H1N1 Influenza A Swine Flu have been found to contain nano particles. Vaccine makers have been experimenting with nanoparticles as a way to “turbo charge” vaccines for several years. Now it has come out that the vaccines approved for use in Germany and other European countries contain nanoparticles in a form that reportedly attacks healthy cells and can be deadly.


In 2007 researchers at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) announced in an article in the journal, Nature Biotechnology, that they had developed a “nanoparticle that can deliver vaccines more effectively, with fewer side effects, and at a fraction of the cost of current vaccine technologies.” The article went on to describe the effects of their breakthrough: “At a mere 25 nanometers, these particles are so tiny that once injected, they flow through the skin’s extracellular matrix, making a beeline to the lymph nodes. Within minutes, they’ve reached a concentration of DCs thousands of times greater than in the skin. The immune response can then be extremely strong and effective.” 1


There is only one small problem with vaccines containing nanoparticles—they can be deadly and at the least cause severe irreparable health damage.


Nanoparticles, promoted in the mass media as the new wonder revolution of science, are particles that have been produced vastly smaller than deadly asbestos particles which caused severe lung damage and death before being outlawed. Particles at a nano size, (nm = 0,000000001 Meter) fuse together with the membranes of our body cell membranes and, according to recent studies in China and Japan, continuously destroy cells once introduced into the body. Once they interact with the body’s cellular structure, they cannot be removed. Modern medicine euphemistically terms the phenomenon, a continuing infectious reaction.


Since the asbestos scandal, it has been established that particles in size a millionth of a meter, because of their enormous attractive force, penetrate all cells, destroying all those they come into contact with. Nanoparticles are far smaller than asbestos fibers.

Beijing Tests confirm deadly effects on humans

The fact that WHO, the European Medicines Evaluation Agency, the German Robert Koch Institute and other health bodies today would permit the population to be injected with largely untested novel vaccines containing nanoparticles says more about the powerful pharma lobby in Euiropean politics than it does about the sanity or moral integrity of the civil servants responsible for health of the general public.

The September 2009 issue of the respected European Respiratory Journal, made public on 19 August, and available since 21 August online, contains a peer-reviewed article with the title, “Exposure to nanoparticles is related to pleural effusion, pulmonary fibrosis and granuloma.”

The article describes tests carried out in 2008 at the elite Beijing Chaoyang Hospital on seven young women. All seven, ages 18-47 had been exposed to nanoparticles for 5–13 months in their common workplace. All were admitted to the hospital with shortness of breath and pleural effusions, or excessive fluids surrounding the lungs, inhibiting breathing. None of the seven had ever smoked and none were in any special risk group. Doctors carefully tested for every possibility and confirmed that the lung problems had a common origin—regular inhalation of nanoparticles in their factory. They had been exposed to Polyacrylat nanoparticles.

The tests confirmed the nanoparticles had set off a “super-meltdown” reaction in the patients. Despite all heroic efforts of doctors, two of the seven died from the lung complications. 2

In their report, the scientists concluded something so alarming it is necessary to quote at length:

Immunological tests, examinations of bacteriology, virology and tumour markers, bronchoscopy, internal thoracoscopy and video-assisted thoracic surgery were performed. Surveys of the workplace, clinical observations and examinations of the patients were conducted. Polyacrylate, consisting of nanoparticles, was confirmed in the workplace. Pathological examinations of patients' lung tissue displayed nonspecific pulmonary inflammation, pulmonary fibrosis and foreign-body granulomas of pleura. Using transmission electron microscopy, nanoparticles were observed to lodge in the cytoplasm and caryoplasm of pulmonary epithelial and mesothelial cells, but are also located in the chest fluid. These cases arouse concern that long-term exposure to some nanoparticles without protective measures may be related to serious damage to human lungs.“3

To date Animal studies and in vitro experiments show that nanoparticles can result in lung damage and other toxicity in animals, but no reports on the clinical toxicity in humans due to nanoparticles prior to the Beijing study had been made.

The Beijing Chaoyang Hospital study has now conclusively confirmed that nanoparticles cause lung damage and other toxicity in humans as well. At this point in time, when two of the approved vaccines planned to be mass distributed in Germany and elsewhere contain nanoparticles, failure of the relevant responsible public health and epidemiology officials to order an immediate emergency freeze on distribution of any vaccine containing nanoparticles can only be considered tantamount to criminal negligence. Hopefully the responsible authorities will react in time to avert a possible human health catastrophe orders of magnitude worse than the worst case of Swine Flu reported to date.

F. William Engdahl is author of Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order. He may be reached via his website, www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net

Notes:


1 EPFL, Bioengineering researchers from the EPFL in Lausanne, Switzerland, have developed and patented a nanoparticle that can deliver vaccines more effectively, with fewer side effects, and at a fraction of the cost of current vaccine technologies, accessed in www.azonano.com/nanotechnology%20news.asp?catid=13.


2 Song Y, Li X, Du X, Exposure to nanoparticles is related to pleural effusion, pulmonary fibrosis and granuloma , European Respiratory Journal, 9/2009, 34(3): 559-567.


3 Ibid.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.

To become a Member of Global Research

The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor@yahoo.com

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com

© Copyright F. William Engdahl, Global Research, 2009

The url address of this article is: www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=15092
© Copyright 2005-2007 GlobalResearch.ca
Web site engine by Polygraphx Multimedia © Copyright 2005-2007


  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon
Posted By Arsine Arsine | 2 months ago
[Comment deleted by user]
Posted By Arsine Arsine | 2 months ago
Having studied medicine myself, I knew from the beginning of the introduction of these "Flu Shots" that they were bogus and futile. Even in the best case scenario, one can only be vaccinated with last years flu virus. Even with the virus being "dead" it can still trigger the Flu to occur in a weakened immune system.

People need to stop being afraid of germs in their natural environment, they need to embrace the cold. Take their vitamins, eat well and you will be the most prepared for anything the world can throw at you!

Nano-particles being completely unnatural, would of course cause horrible harm inside a biological form !

There is good reason to be skeptical about all new drugs and vaccines, the FDA is fine with approving drugs that will kill people, as long as enough $$$$$$$ is behind it !
Reply By muzikdiva muzikdiva | 2 months ago
The really scary thing I've been reading from credible sources is that there are those in very powerful positions who feel there's a need for population reduction. Learn about Codex Alimentarius which will be new legislation outlawing virtually everything healthy and legalizing toxins, that combined with Monsanto and others forcing genetically modified foods on the world through a monopoly on seed manufacturing and distribution. GM foods are an extremely dangerous food source for living creatures, even the disappearance of bee colonies is being link to GM seeds because plants from GM seeds lack the basic nutritional building blocks needed to sustain life. For lack of a better comparison it's not real food if it can't sustain life...

The Swiss are stocking and storing real seeds from every known plant in a vault somewhere in the mountains in Switzerland, supposedly in case there's a global catastrophe so there will be a plentiful supply of seeds to start over with. But, there are those that portend the elite are really doing this to have their own supply of grains and seeds that aren't genetically modified.

It seems like there's a concerted effort on the part of big pharma, insurance and medicine combined with the FDA and certain members of congress to keep us sick. It's more profitable for doctors, hospitals, insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies to keep us sick than to take the time to teach us preventative medicine. The drugs doctors prescribe often create side effects that cost more money to treat and nothing ever gets cured because that's not profitable.

It should be against the law to profit off of someones health care.
Reported by muzikdiva
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @4155641

Most Popular Reports

Related Tweets

  • jahree

    @jahree Finally some good news on AIDS vax, but v. modest. RT @nytimesscience For First Time, AIDS Vaccine Shows Some Success http://bit.ly/193UHD.

    2 months ago
  • juliejohnsson

    @juliejohnsson Swine flu now menacing D-list celebs as well as air travelers. http://bit.ly/rMgk9 RT @Jaunted

    2 months ago
  • LATimesmuskal

    @LATimesmuskal latimesmuskal: It is unclear how significant are the results of Thailand #HIV vaccine trial. But any positive results are huge. http://bit.ly/1UeSuN

    2 months ago
  • daweiner

    @daweiner Rapping swine flu doctor is back, and this time he's a winner! http://bit.ly/jhYIG

    2 months ago
  • Michael_GR

    @Michael_GR Good! "For First Time, AIDS Vaccine Shows Some Success in Trials" http://bit.ly/2FnViH

    2 months ago
  • tomweir_usa2day

    @tomweir_usa2day With all the college football angst about flu how did we not invest in hand sanitizers? http://tinyurl.com/kl33qm

    2 months ago
  • hannibalrex

    @hannibalrex Handling these netbooks is probably a good way to get swine flu #idf09

    2 months ago
  • lcuthbert

    @lcuthbert RT @Discovery_News: Get the latest in-depth research news and commentary on H1N1 Swine Flu here http://ow.ly/quY0

    2 months ago
  • emadigan

    @emadigan RT @AP_Mobile Study tries to detect flu before the first sneeze http://bit.ly/WRdxq

    2 months ago
  • palafo

    @palafo New Drugs May Attack H1N1 Flu, but Not in Time - http://bit.ly/tAknx #swineflu

    2 months ago

Contributions

Help and Accounts


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.