The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

Sexual Cleansing in Iraq: Gay Today, Dead Tomorrow

By: AsherKade send a private message
Baghdad : Iraq | 2 months ago  
Views: 2,807
  • Iraqi Tortured
    Iraqi Tortured
    Posted by: AsherKade
    beheaded and left dead on street
  • Kamal and Rami
    Kamal and Rami
    Posted by: AsherKade
    still together since 2005
  • Gay Man in Iraq
    Gay Man in Iraq
    Posted by: AsherKade
    in gay "safehouse"
  • Murdered Gays in 2006
    Murdered Gays in 2006
    Posted by: AsherKade
    along a street known for gay hot spots
  • Tortured Gay Iraqi
    Tortured Gay Iraqi
    Posted by: AsherKade
    in prison
  • Gay Iraqis Tortured
    Gay Iraqis Tortured
    Posted by: AsherKade
    and humiliated on a public street, anuses glued shut, as they took ...
  • Torture and hanging
    Torture and hanging
    Posted by: AsherKade
    of gays in Iraq
  • Dead Gay Iraqis
    Dead Gay Iraqis
    Posted by: AsherKade
     after being tortured and beatened to death in a street, police look ...

Since the Invasion in 2003, at least 680 homosexual Iraqis have been murdered in Iraq, with at least 70 of these in the past five months. The numbers are likely under-reported, especially with homosexual women, where seven have been declared as brutally murdered just this year. (1) WARNING: these pictures are graphic and not for young viewers.

Interestingly, a fact that shocked me, homosexuality was not criminalized under Sadam Hussein's reign. In the 1960's and 1970's, homosexuality was accepted in Iraq, and there was outspread gay scene there. The maleficent attitudes towards homosexuality began after the Invasion.

Many heterosexual males, with a one-track agenda to purge Iraqof the homosexuals once and for all, hunt Internet chat rooms linked to gay websites daily. Often they spend upwards of 6 to 8 hours at a time finding people who are considered to be destroying Islam and who want to dirty the reputation that was centuries in the making. For whatever reason, murdering someone is acceptable, but being gay is not.

The violence against Iraqi gays is a key test of the government's ability to protect vulnerable minority groups after the Americans have gone. (2)

The Iraqi police have now jumped into the act of "moral policing". They have now taken it upon themselves to enforce classic Islamic tactics of policing moral boundaries.

Iraqi government officials clearly state they don't condone the gay murders.

It is risky to look the part of a gay male in Sadr city, where at least 25 gay males have turned up dead, perverse acts carried out on their corpses, like glued anuses, "pervert" in Arabic carved into their chests, and their genitals ripped off.

It is common for gay Iraqi males to wear light makeup to lighten their skin, which purportedly attracts other gay males. They pierce their ears, a taboo in Iraq if you are male. They take on feminine versions of their names, like going from Basim to Basima. Their chests are shaved. Some even had taken estrogen to develop small breasts.

Technically gays can only be arrested if they are "caught in the act".

In 2005, the country’s most influential Shiite cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, issued a religious decree that said gay men and lesbians should be “punished, in fact, killed.” He added, “The people should be killed in the worst, most severe way of killing.” The language has since been removed from his Web site. The city officials in Sadr City downplay their role in the killings, stating that it was likely that the gays died of honor killings by the hands of their relatives. (3)

Oddly, when captured by gunmen, gays such as Kamal and Rami (4)face unbelievable rape and torture. The odd thing is the fact that the gunmen are trying to eradicate the gays from existence, yet they themselves commit homosexual acts by raping the gay men repeatedly. Kamal and Rami, only teenagers at the time of their capture in 2005, are still together, but are a lot less conspicuous about their relationship.

It's important to note that I didn't write this story because of personal gay pride (I'm "happily" heterosexual), because of gay activism (I'm against homosexuality), or because I enjoy seeing gay pride spread to ends of the earth (I usually turn off the TV!). Rather, it's the larger picture that attracted me to this story.Even if you're gay, or pro-choice, or a liberal, murder shouldn't be condoned in any situation. Murder, by most religions, is simply not acceptable. It is trumped as the worst sin, no matter if another person has gravely sinned and needs to be punished. However, people have the right to exercise what they believe in their own lives, even if it differs from you. The important thing is they don't impeded upon another person's freedoms, force their beliefs down another person's throat, or commit an illegal act or act against another person. The last could be argued here, as many people in the Middle East are seeing homosexuality as being illegal. That was the basis of the story. However, again,it should never be condoned to kill another person because of your beliefs.

I do support the death penalty...but that's the subject of another story...

Copyright Asher Kade 2009

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon
Images
 >
 
Videos
 >
 
Posted By AnneHart AnneHart | 2 months ago
Thanks for this information. For people born genetically gay, this sounds like nasty eugenics.
Posted By brigidprimrose brigidprimrose | 2 months ago
Interesting article, thanks. Since homosexuality is probably as old as prostitution and seems to be a thing that happens in all societies I wonder why so often now days these people are being condemned for their sexuality.
I have also noticed that heterosexual men will often be anti- homosexuality where men are concerned yet accept female lesbianism quite happily and visa-versa with females. I wonder does it all have something to do with heterosexual pride?
We really are strange animals aren't we?
Posted By kofot kofot | 2 months ago
Nobody chooses to be homosexual. The attraction for persons of either ones own sex or the opposite sex is something over which we have no control. It just is. To deem homosexualism a crime and worthy of barbaric punishments is absurd and something I find particularly sinister. What are the heterosexuals, the macho men, so afraid of?
Posted By Changez Changez | 2 months ago
In half the pictures the 'gays' are children, who look like they're in they're teens.

Anyway, one of the most ineresting points you raise in your article is that Homosexuality was not illegal under Saddam: as someone from the region let me add that this was because Sddam was a staunch secularist and let no religious laws become apart of the states laws. Whatever else his faults, he was no religious fundamentalist and kept a strong clamp on the fundamenatlists like Sistani, because he recognised something that many secularists in the 'muslim world' realise; the fundamentalists are the most destructive elements of society, as they are proving now. Post the Iraq invasion, many of these 'men' have been allowed to preach and reach positions of authority by virtue of the ostnsibly democratic right of religious freedom; hey have exploited that right in its 'western' sense to impose their beliefs and gain armed followings, mostly among young uneducated and unemployed males.

When Bush was invading Iraq in 2003, I remember arguing with some friends of mine in Wisconsin who insisted I was prejudiced. I told them, you fools, I don't give a damn about Saddam either way because, not having lived in Iraq, I am not in a position to judge on his being evil without better information (not having elections is not necessarily evil and elections are not always democracy); but invading Iraq is very stupid idea, for the obvious reasons, which are now very clear. Among them was the fact that the WTC attack was made by fundamentalists where Saddam was a strong secularist, and those nuts are now getting free reign in Iraq to practice their demagoguery and violence on the weakest and least protected parts of society.
Posted By AsherKade AsherKade | 2 months ago
I may not agree with all your points Changez, but glad you posted your comment and welcome anyone's views as long as they are not derisive in nature. Just to clarify, I'm not homophobic, and the pictures probably did have gay teens in them. I believe I mentioned gay teens in the article. I just think we should respect life even if one doesn't share your same viewpoint in life....
Reply By Changez Changez | 2 months ago
What points precisely did you disagree with?
Posted By Just_Playin_Dumb Just_Playin_Dumb | 2 months ago
This is scary and very disturbing! Hopefully something can be done to prevent situations like these from happening again in the future.
Posted By sandynguyen sandynguyen | 2 months ago
i really wish things like this don't happen at all. who cares if you're gay or not? you're still a person.
Posted By Maria84 Maria84 | 2 months ago
I know people should justleave the gay people alone,no matter what they are still gong to be together no matter what.But this new post really breaks my heart because were all humans and brothers and sisters and to just go and kill somebody for their gayness is totally stupid.
Posted By caveatlector caveatlector | 2 months ago
I find it fascinating in so many countires of the Middle East the punishment for crimes is so "over the top." I mean, kill gays and lesbians for being gay and lesbian? Then again, if the United States wasn't over there, would I even know about this?
Posted By RutledgeMediaGroup RutledgeMediaGroup | 2 months ago
The middle east has been violent and murderous for centuries, and I don't see that changing anytime soon. I'm personally opposed to the gay life style it goes against my believes, but at the same time, I am more opposed to murdering someone because they are Gay, It has happened here in the United States as well, gays being killed and beaten up etc, it just isn't reported as much as in other countries.
Posted By AKADE777 AKADE777 | 2 months ago
ASHER KADE VIA MOBILE:


Changez:
'not having elections is not necessarily evil and elections are not always democracy' true, having elections or not isn't evil, but it is democratic because otherwise the people don't have a choice or a vote....isn't that considered a dictatorship?
'Among them was the fact that the WTC attack was made by fundamentalists' explain your point, because it kinda rubbed me wrong...they blew up our people, I don't care who or what they subscribed too.

Maria84:
yes, we are all people no matter what, and murder is murder and always wrong-I agree with you!


caveatlector:
no, I doubt we would know about these horrific crimes if not over there fighting an endless war, you're so right.And, to add, if American's had a lawless land like theirs, I bet more of that crap would be happening here (don't mean to step on any toes...just saying, let someone get away with murder, and there will be more of it!)

RutledgeMediaGroup:
I don't agree to homosexuality, and don't think it's a biological part of their life, it's a choice, but no matter what, you can't murder someone because of a personal choice. They haven't committed a crime, just a sin, and that's for them to take up with their God. I'm not their God, and I have no right to judge, as I have made my own fair share of sins.
Reply By Changez Changez | 2 months ago
My point is that those people were neither Iraqi, nor were they sent by saddam: they were a bunch of religious fundamentalists

"I don't care who or what they subscribed too." - start.

Dictatorship is also tossed around like a dirty word:
Reply By AKADE777 AKADE777 | 2 months ago
huh? We don't know if they were sent by Saddam....we don't even know where Osama Bin Laden is....and I fail to understand what the second sentence means. Start what?
Reply By lecia lecia | 2 months ago
that's because dictatorship IS a dirty word...you don't believe in freedom for ALL people? you think not everyone is entitled to choose their government? tell which people do you think are not worthy of a democracy?
Posted By RutledgeMediaGroup RutledgeMediaGroup | 2 months ago
Haven't we all? Committed our own fair share of sins, I totally agree with you.
Reply By Changez Changez | 2 months ago
No you see, we do know that they were not sent by Saddam because Saddam was a secularist who had no truck with the religious fundamentalists; if you knew that then Bush would not have been able to lie the nation into a war. War is horrible, no matter what high aspirations it purports to achieve.

My point is to start caring about who they are and what they subscribe too. Otherwise you fail to make a distinction between people's in the same way that they do and can be taken in by the rhetoric of the war mongers. They see no difference between a neo-nazi skin-head and you. Because they don't care to learn.
Reply By Changez Changez | 2 months ago
[Comment deleted by user]
Posted By lecia lecia | 2 months ago
yeah changez saddam was a real choir boy.... who commited genocide against his own people.
Posted By RutledgeMediaGroup RutledgeMediaGroup | 2 months ago
Saddam got what he deserved, he had it coming. He was a terroist to his own people and his sons were no better and also deserved to die.
Posted By AsherKade AsherKade | 2 months ago
So true Lecia and Rutledge! Again, I don't sympathise with your cause if you murder, and I don't want to learn anything about you unless it prevents more killings.
Posted By Changez Changez | 2 months ago
There's a good quote I read once that said, if you're popular and well liked, you're probably doing something wrong; which makes me happy that all three of you are disagreeing with me right now.

Lets have some facts shall we, and all my facts can be confirmed by independent or even US government sources:

In 1979 Saddam Hussein came to power in a CIA assisted coup after his predecessor as President of the Baath party became a liability; Note that this was the same year as the Iranian Revolution, the process and riots of which had already been underway since 1977. His predecessors played the dangerous balancing game between the US and USSR, and were more inclined towards pan-arab socialism of the Nasser model; hence they were problems.

After the Iranian revolution he became an exceptionally close US ally, and received large amounts of funding to prosecute the horrendous Iran Iraq war; so far I think we're pretty much in agreement.

Now, about his being a 'terroriser' in the Bush terminology of his own people:
The firs thing is he was in power for less time than Hosni Mubarak has been, and Mubarak has a pretty awful human rights record too; but he gets 3 bn a year in Military aid.

After Saddam's capture, the one charge that prosecutors could make stick during the trial was that he gassed 136 shia's in the north somewhere in 1986. So no millions killed, and so on, just that. After he invaded Kuwait, the sanctions imposed on Iraq might as well have been the same as the Versailles reparations on ww1 Germany; do you know that during the period 1992-2003, over one million Iraqi's dies as a result of disease and starvation; i.e. the oil for food program and sanctions on Iraq were no more than a ploy to get cheap, very cheap, oil out of the country.

Next, let's see, in 2001, Russia and France said that the oil for food program was bankrupt, morally, and decided to open regular relations with Iraq and bypass the sanctions regime. They were already protesting from 1998. Guess what happened next: Iraq became part of the Axis of evil, even though it had nothing to do with 9-11, since Saddam was, as i have said before, hated by the fundamentalists and radicals for being a secularist. In fact most of the people he imprisoned in his country were probably religious fundamentalists,; just like Hosni Mubarak in Egypt has virtually eliminated the Muslim Brotherhood with his vicious security apparatus.

Now, let's get a few things straight; the various charges against Saddam were never proven, they are just assumed to be true, because your government has now blitzed into your minds this propaganda so much that you don't even question whether or not they are telling you the truth, you just swallow it whole, without knowing a damn things about it. They could turn around tomorrow and tell you that in fact Egypt is also a genocidal state, if Egypt were to decide to oppose US policy, and people would probably believe it; Hosni Mubaraks' regime is definitley nasty and brutish, but he hasn't committed genocide yet; that is called propaganda and people in the States don't usually bother to find out for themselves.
I know because I've lived there.

So get off your high horses about Saddam being this giant evil and oppressive tyrant; He was about as evil as any other dictator in the world, but it isn't the US's right or job to remove any dictator, least of all when it is supporting others worse, or just as bad, with it's other hand because they do what it says or are useful and bring down democratic governments that do not.

As for AK's remark about not wanting to learn, that is the entire problem; only learning will prevent more killings, and maybe not just American lives, but the lives of other people around the world too, that are just as important, like 500,000 iraqis in 5 years.
Posted By AKADE777 AKADE777 | 2 months ago
I thought this article was about killing gays, and how wrong it was to kill anyone....how did we get off the subject?
(pondering....contempleting...)
Reply By Changez Changez | 2 months ago
Because we've already determined that killing gay people for being gay is a ridiculous and disgusting thing to do.
Posted By Shirley66 Shirley66 | about 1 month ago
I do not think killing a human life is the solution for any issues. Gay issues or not.
Reply By AsherKade AsherKade | about 1 month ago
I most certainly agree....and thank you for your nice comment!
Reported by AsherKade

Related Allvoices Contributions

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @4145649

Most Popular Reports

Related People

Contributions

Help and Accounts


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.