The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

$2,480,000,000: What Does That Number Have To Do With Healthcare?

By: amalgam80 send a private message
Woodridge : IL : USA | 2 months ago  
Views: 138

Where did almost $ 2.5 trillion dollars go from the U.S. government? Well a healthy portion of the money went to the wealthiest in our nation.

Citizens for Tax Justice, a Washington based research group, has just released a study that shows the Bush Tax Cuts of 2001 and 2003 have cost the U.S. government more than what the Democrats’ healthcare reform is to cost.

The study concludes that over the ten year period of the tax cuts, the total cost of the tax cuts to the U.S. government is estimated at approximately 2.48 trillion dollars. It is 2.1 trillion dollars if you do not include the additional interest payments on the national debt made necessary by the deficit-financed cuts. Based on the Congressional Budget Office’s estimations of the Democrats healthcare reform package, as suggested with the public option, if 1 trillion dollars, over a ten year period.

Bush tax cuts cost 2.1 or 2.48, however you decide to view it, and the Democrats public option plan will cost 1 trillion dollars.

The report says, "Many of the lawmakers who argue that the health care reform legislation is 'too costly' are the same lawmakers who supported the Bush tax cuts."

Of those lawmakers the report blames for supporting Bush Tax cuts and not the Dems’ healthcare reform are Republican Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Republican from Kentucky.

Shahien Nasiripour, on Huffington Post reported that, “The conservative Heritage Foundation argues the Bush tax cuts spurred positive economic activity. But as a January report in The Washington Post notes, "President Bush has presided over the weakest eight-year span for the U.S. economy in decades, according to an analysis of key data, and economists across the ideological spectrum increasingly view his two terms as a time of little progress on the nation's thorniest fiscal challenges."

The CTJ report says that the top 5% of the wealthiest received 979 billion of Bush’s tax cuts, whereas the bottom 20% received approximately received 21.2 billion over the ten year period. That is .8% of the total tax cut for the bottom and where as the top 5% received 52.5% of the tax cut. The top 20% received 74.7% of the tax cut. 74.7% for the richest, .8% for the poorest.

The $2.48 trillion number would be higher if you account for inflation, which this study did not do.

Here is the link to the study I refer to throughout the article: http://www.ctj.org/pdf/bushtaxcutsvshealthcare.pdf

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon

Related Allvoices Contributions

News Stories
 
  • News Source: The Tribune | 2 months ago
    President Barack Obama on Wednesday laid out a series of compromises he's willing to make to get a health care overhaul through a nervous Congress this year, including diluting his vision for a new public insurance program and embracing ideas floated...
  • News Source: The Salt Lake City Tribune | 2 months ago
    Republican lawmakers are almost universally opposed to the president's plan for reform, while Democrats have become fractured over some of the more controversial items. In his address before a joint session of Congress -- a rare step for a policy...
  • News Source: Politico | 2 months ago
    Six major trade associations urged Senate leaders to quickly to raise the $12.1 trillion cap on the national debt, a move that will undoubtedly cause political headaches for Democrats facing serious questions about the cost of health care reform.
  • News Source: Bradenton Herald | 2 months ago
    We do intend to get something done this year," Obama said on ABC's "Good Morning America."...And Republicans pressed their case that Obama's sweeping approach won't wash. "The status quo is unacceptable. But if August showed us anything, it's that so...
  • News Source: Androscoggin News | 2 months ago
    Obama battled for health reform in his home state of Illinois in 2004, a dry-run to his current campaign to overhaul the national system, reports the Washington Post . The Post paints a picture of his style then, as now, as methodical and inclusive,...
  • News Source: CNSNews.com | 2 months ago
    While President Obama will likely make news tonight by telling a joint session of Congress what he wants and is willing to accept from a health care reform proposal, he may also repeat some points he has made over the past few months that have been...
Blogs
 >
  • Blog Source: rebellenation.blogspot.com
    Enacted in 2001 and 2003, the Bush tax cuts are projected to cost about $2.1 trillion in lost revenue in the 10 years since they were first passed, according to Citizens for Tax Justice, a liberal-leaning research group in Washington, ... Republican
  • Blog Source: nwi-opinion.blogspot.com
    Enacted in 2001 and 2003, the Bush tax cuts are projected to cost about $2.1 trillion in lost revenue in the 10 years since they were first passed, according to Citizens for Tax Justice, a liberal-leaning research group in Washington, ... Republican
  • Blog Source: yidwithlid.blogspot.com
    The other is the cost, estimated at $1 trillion over a decade. While Democrats say the plan will be budget-neutral, Republicans say the cost savings and tax increases being used to fund new programs would better go toward reducing the ... Orrin Hatch,
  • Blog Source: anidiotsravingsattheedge.blogspot.com
    ... Charles Grassley (R-IA), Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Olympia Snowe (R-ME), and Orrin Hatch (R-UT) -- voted to allow the use of the budget reconciliation process to pass legislation during the Bush administration, including tax cuts. ...
  • Blog Source: www.luxlibertas.com
    “In every case, he fought as hard as he could . . . but, when he recognized that he couldn't get everything he wanted, he could get a good bill by working with the other side,” Utah Republican Senator Orrin Hatch said on ABC's “This ... All
  • Blog Source: www.washingtonexaminer.com
    Orrin Hatch plan to discuss legislation that calls for the nation's first limits on pollution linked to global warming. At a forum scheduled for Thursday in a state auditorium, Herbert and Hatch plan to talk about how cap and trade ...
Videos
 >
 
  • Posted By amalgam80 amalgam80 | 2 months ago
    If you liked the article please become a fan and read some of the other articles written by me. Thanks.
  • Posted By Changez Changez | 2 months ago
    I just find it surprising that Clinton handed the country a surplus for the first time in decades and people still call him a bad president because he had a minor affair; on the positive side -

    a) he did away with a massive deficit
    b) He was popular around the world despite doing various things that would be considered morally or legally on the red line, like bombing Iraq and Sudan, but he was such a good and suave politician he got away with it - therefore he was a good representative for the US abroad which is a major part of a President's duties.
    c) given the dot.com bubble, he still presided over and helped manage and nurture one of the largest expansions in the US economy ever,
    d) He presided over the only and most advanced settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian issue with the signing of the Oslo accords and the establishment of the PA.
    And people still attack him because of his 'morals'. But he never went to war without some reason, and he drew the line at some places, part. when it came to the possibility of nuclear war.

    Bush led the country into one useless war, which he lied to start, and several other smaller conflicts, he spent billions of dollars, got in to pwoer despite being unelected, spent american lives, oversaw the deaths of 600,000 iraqis, was the most unpopular president in the history of the US abroad, oversaw a 2 trillion dollar deficit, and people still defend him, just because of his party. Why they can't jusdge him as an individual without the party I don't knw, because then you see, he's a man without brains or morals.
  • Reported by amalgam80
    Report Your News Got a similar story?
    Add it to the network!

    Or add related content to this report

    Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @4113256

    Most Popular Reports

    Related Tweets

    • ktumulty

      @ktumulty New Blog Entry, "Health Exchanges: The More, The Better for Small Business" - http://tinyurl.com/re857z

      2 months ago
    • TheFix

      @TheFix As predicted -- Tpaw and ACORN http://bit.ly/n31QD

      2 months ago
    • Juliedeardorff

      @Juliedeardorff Medical bills cause two-thirds of bankruptcies. Of those cases, 78 percent HAVE #healthinsurance http://bit.ly/zuOyJ

      2 months ago
    • jonesdel

      @jonesdel Average family health insurance policy $6,438 in 2000, $13,375 in 2009 http://bit.ly/zTPSP

      2 months ago
    • amolrajan

      @amolrajan so tomorrow's Daily Mail has a story on oen of the government's senior law persons employing an illegal immigrant

      2 months ago
    • jaketapper

      @jaketapper ACORN orders freeze on new clients, orders audit > http://bit.ly/iT3Pw

      2 months ago
    • codywillard

      @codywillard If you get the tax breaks for healthcare, if employers get taxbreaks for HC, if HC's free for poor people...uh, who's paying in? #tfree

      2 months ago
    • LATimescitydesk

      @LATimescitydesk CA Senate passes reduced prisons package, $200 million short of savings assumed in budget: http://bit.ly/FW0tn

      2 months ago
    • hannibalrex

      @hannibalrex I like @OptARM, but this is a nutty post: http://bit.ly/6hsG6. Americans == "overindulged"? Really?!? http://bit.ly/6jNxI

      2 months ago
    • kenrudin

      @kenrudin OK, so the president spoke. But what did people hear? And what will Congress do? http://tinyurl.com/m2jdyu

      2 months ago

    Related Allvoices Reports

    Related People

    Contributions

    Help and Accounts


    Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

    © Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.