The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

Van Jones...Sticks and Stones Hurt...But Words Hurt Too?

Washington : DC : USA | 3 months ago  
Views: 133
  • Van Jones
    Van Jones
    Source: AFP
Van Jones

News reports today mention the resignation of Anthony "Van" Jones - activist turned special adviser to President Obama on Green Jobs.

What forced him to resign? Well in true "watch what you say or do" fashion, word has come about that he signed a petition prior to becoming one of Obama's special advisers, speculating that President Bush might have allowed attacks on 9/11 as a pretext for war.

The news report also mentions that he made derogatory statements about Republicans in February.

It is unfortunate that these actions have become the thorn in his side to bear, but I respect his decision to remove himself from the Obama circle, lest this talk becomes more directly associated with Obama's capabilities as a leader and judge of character.

I guess this is a case and demonstration of being aware of your choice of words and actions. Do not be afraid to speak your mind, but tact goes a long way. I know that this was an issue when Obama spoke out on the Gates Arrest. It was called into question when Sotomayor made the "wise latina remark" and mentioned that "Courts make policy". The most well-intentioned actions can be derailed by miscommunication.

I agree with Howard Dean. I do not seriously believe Jones had any real belief in a 9/11 conspiracy theory, but he signed the petition - a tough lesson for him.

And as far as the assertions by Republicans that Jones associated with Communists -

Wouldn't that be a "duh" moment given the evolution of the group Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement? In addition, as painful as it may be to accept, communist were frequently in the mix when it came to advocating for the oppressed and powerless in the U.S., i.e. the Civil Rights movement. Dr. King, Jr. kept the company of close advisers that were affiliated with the Communist Party at one time or another. Bayard Rustin, a homosexual, black, male, communist (all bad back in that time period, but to belong to all of those groups? He might as well have been the epitome of un-American in many people's minds) that helped to organize the March on Washington in 1963. Was King communist by association then? Or dangerous to American values and progress? J. Edgar Hoover would have liked you to think so. I didn't think we were still in the era of McCarthyism where the mention of knowing someone who knows someone who is communist is cause to try someone for treason against the country, or to assume they are unfit to uphold the democratic morals and freedoms inspired by individualism that America is founded upon.

Lets not make this more than it is. I would love to hear these "derogatory statements" he made about Republicans. But unfortunately it seems that the way the idea is conveyed is more important than the idea itself. I am sure Jones had serious grievances about the behavior of Republicans as of late, but maybe his delivery was "too blunt" for some and "too real" for most. And I would also be interested to know his thoughts on this petition that he signed.

Whatever the case, it seems that the lesson here is, for better or for worse, in today's age, "Sticks and stones can break your bones, but words can definitely hurt you."



Contributor, Young Writer's Block
Contributor, The Carmon Report

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon

Related Allvoices Contributions

News Stories
 
  • News Source: Truthdig | 3 months ago
    Fox program en masse after the civil-rights group Color of Change mounted a campaign urging advertisers to boycott Beck, who labeled President Barack Obama a “racist.” As the campaign progressed, Beck began his attacks against Van Jones. Jones...
  • News Source: The Progressive | 3 months ago
    Van Jones was probably the single most prominent progressive in the Obama Administration. A founder of the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights and a leading green jobs advocate, Van Jones represented us in the White House...Gone because Glenn Beck and...
  • News Source: The Nation | 3 months ago
    In March, I wrote here on The Notion in celebration of the appointment of Van Jones . I am both politically committed to and academically interested in issues of environmental justice...The modern environmental justice movement emerged more than...
  • News Source: Uinta County News | 3 months ago
    Van Jones, Mainstream Environmentalist    [ Chris Horner ] I'll admit, I'm surprised Van Jones is out of the White House. After all, they had already overlooked his batty theories about government involvement in creating economic growth.   I kid,...
  • News Source: Politico | 3 months ago
    He is a minor player, he has no power, no budget, why take him? It's because he looks like Obama and he has all those same attributes of being well-educated and he's an electrifying speaker with an elite education," said John Anner, a good friend of...
  • News Source: CNSNews.com | 3 months ago
    The White House environmental adviser under fire for inflammatory statements made before he joined the administration resigned after what he called a "vicious smear campaign against me."   Van Jones "understood that he was going to get in the way"...
Blogs
 >
  • Blog Source: citizenwells.wordpress.com
    The Obama Green Energy Czar, communist, left wing radical, resigned on Saturday, September 5, 2009. From the Guardian UK, September 6, 2009: “Obama adviser Van Jones resigns”. “Jones was linked to efforts suggesting government role in 9/11
  • Blog Source: www.lewrockwell.com
    They have, of course, censored the real reasons why Van Jones is gone. No one remembers a 9-11 truther moment from 5 years ago, or cares, and the part about “derogatory comments about Republicans” is a bit anemic, if not laughable. Van Jones was
Videos
 >
 
  • Posted By Redhanded101 Redhanded101 | 3 months ago
    No one should be sticking up for this guy, he made his own bed.This is a prime example of a double standard and reverse racism.A few years back Don Imus made a stupid remark about the Rutgers womans basketball and calling them "Nappy headed hoes". Al Sharpton pounced on this and forced Don Imus to step down and opologize. So when Van Jones, a man selected by the president of the US to provide advice and input and bipartisan ideas, he cannot make the kind of comments he made and expect to get away with it.Just imagine if a White Green Jobs Czar had called President Obama a Crack Head? What if a White man in the same position as van Jones had made the remark that Black Pollutists were responsible for steering poison into White communities? They would be fired on the spot.So please spare us the company line and expect people to have sympathy for this guy.The sad part in all of this is that President Obama himself did not ask him to resign.
  • Posted By SpkTruth2Pwr SpkTruth2Pwr | 3 months ago
    I agree with you. I am not saying that he deserves sympathy. I am saying that he is learning a hard lesson - that what you say, regardless of the truth or fable of it, can be completely distorted by the way you wish to convey it. The only thing that I said in his favor is the piece arguing about why saying he associated with communists is relevant. My tone is just to be objective. I don't know what he said about Republicans in February. But I do know that signing a petition that supports the belief in a 9/11 conspiracy theory is bad, whether or not he signed supporting the theory or absent-mindedly.I say I respect him, because he had the gall and responsibility to step down without having to be urged by Obama.
  • Reply By Redhanded101 Redhanded101 | 3 months ago
    If you take him at his word, that he resigned for the greater good, than I will cut him a little slack. He was just becoming too much of a distraction.The White House was not the Arena to discuss and go more into detail about his remarks. What we need to ask him is why he felt the way he did and what corroborating evidence he may have.
  • Posted By lecia lecia | 3 months ago
    I do not seriously believe Jones had any real belief in a 9/11 conspiracy theory, but he signed the petition...if he didn't "believe" it then why did he sign it? ever heard that saying "actions speak louder than words"?
  • Posted By SpkTruth2Pwr SpkTruth2Pwr | 3 months ago
    @lecia I definitely understand actions speaking louder than words, but I am also looking at it from another context. I know I have been on campus back when i was in school, and signed something simply because the group the person said they were representing or the general cause they were purporting to support, without actually reading all of the bullet points and declarations in the document. So I am saying it is very likely to sign something without reading it or being aware of all the content you are endorsing with your signature. People do it all the time in daily life, whether it is a contract, an agreement on a loan, etc. It is not good judgment to sign ANYTHING that you do not thoroughly look over, but does that happen? yes.So I would say it is highly likely the group could have approached him saying any number of things about the petition, and he exhibited bad judgment by not reading first.
  • Posted By SpkTruth2Pwr SpkTruth2Pwr | 3 months ago
    @lecia example: I am approached on the street by an advocate from a Christian group that says "we want government to do more to encourage family as an institution in this country I immediately think, "wow, well I am a Christian, so we have that in common, and I do believe family is an essential building block in society. So yeah, I support the government doing more to promote the idea of two parents in the household, etc. etc."Now I sign and go on about my day. BUT the petition should have been read more closely. Maybe the petition says, as a FUNDAMENTALIST Christian organization, we believe women should stay at home and be housekeepers subservient to their husbands. We believe this is the only way to encourage family as it SHOULD be, and it will not wreck the home. We want the President to push for women to only be able to work part-time or not at all, so they can spend more time with their children and serving their husband devotedly."Now I am just making this up off the cuff. But the idea is that I would DEFINITELY not support this petition. However, out of bad judgment, I didn't read that far into it, because I assumed we were on the same page because I had something in common with the group. I shouldn't have signed it, but I did. Do I actually believe what I signed? Heck no. I would have known that if I had read it.
  • Reported by SpkTruth2Pwr
    Report Your News Got a similar story?
    Add it to the network!

    Or add related content to this report

    Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @4094163

    Most Popular Reports

    Related Tweets

    Related Allvoices Reports

    Related People

    Contributions

    Help and Accounts


    Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

    © Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.