A school in Utah is apologizing for showing a video titled "I Pledge" at an elementary school assembly after an activist called it "propaganda."
The argument is that it only shows one side of a number of issues, and in that respect I can certainly understand the criticism. However, the video includes clips of various celebrities making generic pledges to make this country better, specifically by volunteering, helping to eradicate hunger and slavery and protecting the environment. Other than a clip of Anthony Kiedis pledging to help Barack Obama, there's very little that's inherently political or partisan.
But the fact that the president of the Utah Eagle Forum wou;d call this propaganda shows how some people are still turning some universal concerns into political wedge issues. It's propaganda to pledge to drive slower so you use less gas? Isn't that being fiscally responsible? It's partisan to volunteer your time to UNICEF? When did UNICEF become a liberal group? It's propaganda to raise awareness of autism?
After seeing the video, I decided this isn't a case of a video being one-sided. It's a case of our democratically elected president calling for action from Americans, and a group that opposes him ideologically and can't get on board with even the most vague pledges because they don't like the guy we elected. I'd like to know what he would have done if the kids had seen a video from George W Bush calling for increased military service. Is that right-wing propaganda?
But let me open it up to all of you. Watch the video and let's discuss whether it's partisan or whether it's the president asking Americans to get involved in public life.