'Canadian Galapagos' bird sanctuary threatened by proposed wind farm
Crabbing industry would be hurt, too
“The whole of the Queen Charlottes is a bird sanctuary drawing many to the west coast to view [over 200 different] bird species.
Today, bird watchers, naturalists and all who enjoy and appreciate the outdoors can view birds like a Bald Eagle, Great Blue Heron, Mallard and Pintail Duck, Trumpeter Swan, Canada Goose, Sharp-shinned Hawk, Red Tailed Hawk, Peregrine Falcon, Green-winged Teal, Bufflehead, Common Merganser, Black Oystercatcher, Northern Saw-whet Owl, Belted Kingfisher, Red-breasted Sapsucker, Fox Sparrow, Song Sparrow and so many more.”
This is from to the PelagicBirds.com and Copper Sky Sailing Adventures, which build their travel packages around the exquisite landscape and abundance of birdlife.
“For many, a birding trip to the Queen Charlotte Islands is the trip of a lifetime with easily observed species that are difficult to find elsewhere. Surrounded by old growth temperate rainforest, steep rocky coast lines, sheltered bays, and open ocean, this area would be awe inspiring even without the amazing bird species.”
The area is so unique it is referred to as The Canadian Galapagos.
The crabbing is also outstanding, whether you happen enjoy a day on the water to gather the night’s meal, or a yummy meal at a local seafood eatery.
I wish I could write this story as a travel brochure for this gorgeous North American gem, but if the proposed prop-style wind farm is built here, right in the midst of migratory flyways and breeding grounds, there will be no reason to bring your birding glasses. Or your crab traps.
True, wind energy is a much needed alternative to our current use of fossil fuels, and there are some promising new designs being built. Improvements over the archaic and deadly prop-style turbines include vertical-shaft and tail-bladed models.
The plan for the Queen Charlotte wind farm, however, is to use the old-style three-bladed prop-style designs that are not only inefficient but infamous bird and bat killers.
Despite industry propaganda, bird mortality from such farms is alarmingly high, and worse, due to the placement of the farms, many of the casualties are endangered or protected species like Golden eagles.
Birds can’t see the spinning blades and are slaughtered by the thousands, decapitated and dismembered. Bats feeding on insects around the turbines get knocked out by the change in air pressure near the spokes before being struck.
Claims made by the industry that “more birds are killed by cars and buildings than by wind farms” are nonsense, especially when it comes to soaring birds; but even if it were true, the ‘logic’ of such an argument is ludicrous. It’s like saying, “Since so many people die of heart disease, it’s not worth preventing cancer.”
Besides, when it comes to endangered species, each and every individual counts.
A recent Newsweek article spotlighted the controversy surrounding wind farms, but left out some very important information. First, it made no mention of the improved designs available; it also mistakenly repeated incorrect (downplayed) bird strike and wildlife mortality statistics. Bird kill actually runs into the millions annually, with a majority being eagles and other birds of prey.
Consider this quote from Michael Fry, Director of Conservation Advocacy, American Bird Conservancy:
“We . . . use the 2004 summary data from NWCC wind-wildlife workgroup. At 3-11 birds per MW per year, and 29,440 MW installed as of June 2009, the total would be about 88,000-2.5 million birds per year for collisions only.”
Why should we care about some birds when clean energy is so important?
Beyond the ecological and intrinsic value, wildlife watching – and particularly bird watching -- is a very lucrative industry in Queen Charlottes.
“We have 35,000 residents, but interestingly, 45% are non-resident. We are the playground for over three million people in the immediate area, not counting tourists coming from around the world,” states this report by Ms. Anne Murray, House of Common Committees, Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, Oct 25, 2001.
. . . [the] Fraser River estuary . . . meets the criteria of globally significant numbers and diversity of birds, having the highest number of bird species in the whole of Canada. This is just another example of how important British Columbia is for biodiversity.
Over 250 species of birds live or pass through here. Eighty percent of the world's population of Cassin's auklet and 60% to 90% of Barrow's goldeneye breed in British Columbia, as well as the endangered marbled murrelet. It is a mecca for bald eagles and peregrine falcons.
“Whale watching and pelagic birdwatching are extremely important ecotourism activities, and the clear, cold waters of B.C. are recognized as a premier scuba diving destination,” Ms. Anne Murray goes on to say.
Non-consumptive recreational activity (mostly bird watching) in the Queen Charlotte vicinity accounts for over 99% of all visitor expenditures (2006).
This illustrates just how valuable preserving wildlife is to the health of local economies, not just the health of the planet.
Unfortunately the NaiKun Wind Energy Group plans on planting its turbines in Hecate Strait, between the Queen Charlotte Islands and Prince Rupert on the mainland -- critical habitat and migratory flyway for untold numbers of rare and endangered species.
“This proposed windfarm is being slated for an area where any bird mortality will probably end up in the ocean, rather than recorded. Any lights put on the towers over the water will attract fish. This is a well documented fact known by the fisherman familiar with oil the platforms in the Gulf of Mexico. The attraction of fish will bring birds to the site. Turbines will look like a solid landing place for birds to stop and rest as they are flying offshore and result in even more death to the sea birds.” (Wiegand; Private correspondence)
Even if birds don’t matter to you, what about jobs? If you live and work in Queen Charlotte, crabbing is a much-needed source of income. At the local level, NaiKun's proposal is ringing alarm bells.
Under the current proposal, 110 wind turbines would be erected “right in the middle” of the region's most productive crab fishing area, Geoff Gould, Executive director of the Area A Crab Association, said. It would have a capacity of about 396 megawatts.
The proposed turbine array would occupy about 85 square kilometres and “[T]hat would mean, we're quite sure, that we would no longer be able to crab in that area,” Mr. Gould said, in a letter posted on Environmental, by Wendy Stueck, Globe and Mail, Thursday, Jun. 04, 2009.
More, NaiKun is offering financial incentives to the native population in exchange for their support of the project. According to a news release dated August 13, 2009,
“NaiKun Wind Energy Group Inc. (TSX VENTURE:NKW) and the Haida Enterprise Corporation announced today that they have signed an agreement for the Haida Nation to acquire up to 40 per cent of the wind energy project being developed through NaiKun Wind subsidiary NaiKun Wind Generating Inc.
"This is an important step for the NaiKun Wind project," said Paul Taylor, NaiKun Wind's President and CEO. "Having the Haida Nation with an ownership interest in the proposed project company underscores their support and commitment."
While it may be a very smart ploy to offer possible opponents a financial stake in the venture in order to gain their support, it’s also frightening. There might be some cooperation by Nation Leaders due to bribery, but support from the native community itself is questionable, to say the least.
Opponents – including indigenous peoples -- are wary of speaking out for fear of reprisals.
A situation like this begs closer scrutiny. Why there is not more outrage from the apathetic public? Why is no one questioning the impact from the long arm of European/Wall Street investments degrading the quality of life for Canadians?
“Bring your binoculars, because Haida Gwaii hosts over 250 different bird species, including the rare horned puffin. You'll spot masses of gulls, eagles and ravens during the fish-spawning season,” the National Geographic Traveler boasts.
This is what’s at stake if the 550 prop turbines get built.
No matter which way one looks at this project, it appears someone needs to put the brakes on and come up with a less destructive alternative.
While there’s still something left to save.
Related articles:
Wind farms may be wrong answer for wildlife
Wind energy CAN work for wildlife
-
- Share:
-
-
-
-
-
-
Reach -
Credibility
-
The other new development for this is that they want to DREDGE critical marine habitat/sea beds for the construction, will completely destroy the fisheries, endanger even more wildlife etc.
I hope more people get involved to stop crimes like this.
The Newsweek article is useless in solving the Prop turbine bird/bat mortality problem and dealing with the proliferation of the prop turbines across America. First of all NOTHING is said about new turbine designs. There are new vertical shaft turbine and other designs that produce far more wind energy than prop turbines. This is very important because this would also solve the bird mortality problem and produce more energy. Birds and bats fly around these designs and do not try to fly through blades spinning at 200 mph. It is absurd that this was left out of the article.
The use of the word “Mitigate” by the wind industry is a joke. The industry uses this term regularly and they claim to have a right to mitigate any environmental problem. This term is also used in all their Environmental Impact Reports. Anytime you see this word put out by the industry think of it as posturing, a legal dance, or a comforting hand holding session by the industry that goes nowhere.
Part of the mitigation process involves studies. Studies are important in the mitigation process for two reasons, first it is a good reason to stall for years and second studies can be slanted or rigged. This is how the industry dealt with the slaughtered birds of prey issue at Altamont pass. Look at the two golden eagle studies and the vertical shaft turbine comparison study for Altamont pass. These are published as being credible and scientific but they were rigged for the benefit of the wind industry. Anyone that tried to stop the killing at Altamont Pass was engaged in this entirely corrupt process. At this point any new studies are virtually meaningless. The problems are already known……… birds and bats are not compatible with prop turbines and never will be. Blades tips that spin at over 300 ft or the length of a football field per second are much faster than any bird.
Committees and proposed legislation as mentioned in the article are also useless. It is just part of the posturing process. Look at this statement in the article. “Mostly conducting research such as determining the extent to which an area being considered for wind development can harm wildlife. If the potential is great, the AWWI will recommend the project be abandoned; if there are less dangerous consequences, the committee may suggest certain measures to minimize any potential impact. Curtailment—or shutting down the turbines at times when bats or migratory birds appear and are more vulnerable to collision—is one such measure.”
The “AWWI will recommend” and ”the committee may suggest certain measures”. These are carefully chosen words written by lawyers that mean absolutely nothing. It is again just industry posturing from our corrupt green friends. The final statement in the article……….."We understand that certainly there are impacts, but they need to be viewed in the larger context, "It's not wind energy versus nothing; it's wind energy versus some other form of energy which will also invariably have an impact—potentially more of an impact than a wind project.”
This is again, meaningless garbage used to rationalize the mortality issue. As we know and it does not state anywhere in the article is that a prop turbine wind farm targets and chops up protected species every time they put one of these projects into their critical habitats. Over 90% of the species killed by prop turbines are protected by laws.
Finally the article gives the wind industry the last word. This is very important because the last statement is used illustrate the slant of the article and persuade the readers. The article puts some of the problems out there but in the end it is made it look like the industry is aware of and handling the problems. In actuality the wind industry is just selling lethal and archaic technology, to a misinformed public.
There is a much bigger and more important story here if you decide to run with it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9srPoOU6_Z4&feature=autofb
The prop turbine in this video is not even spinning at full speed. It is spinning at 12 rotations per minute. At full speed it will spin at 20 rotations per minute making this wind turbine even more dangerous to anything that happens to fly by.
Fraud is commonly used in the permitting process. I recently came across this fraudulent statement used by the wind industry in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the PDV Wind Project in Kern County, CA ………….“Scientific literature also suggests that diurnal vultures, such as the California condor, are not at substantial risk for collisions with wind turbines.”
The scientific community is very aware that each year thousands of vultures of every type are slaughtered by prop wind turbines. The numbers of dead vultures worldwide indicates that these slow flying gliders are not at all able to “skillfully” avoid the 200 mph tip speed a prop wind turbine as claimed in the Final PDV EIR. This video clearly demonstrates the danger prop wind turbines are to all birds and the corruption involved in the cover-up.
Kern County recently gave the wind industry a permit to construct the large PDV prop wind turbine farm in condor habitat. A decision on another large prop wind farm, the Alta Oak Wind Project, will be given in November 09. It too will be located in condor habitat.
The public is not aware that there are alternative wind turbine designs available that do not slaughter our precious wildlife and they also produce more energy. One of them is produced by Environmental Technologies LLC. If the corrupt entities of Wall Street, Washington, and our courts were not protecting this industry, this terrible problem would already be resolved.
Cell phones use report code: Related Tweets
-
@Acererak @JulietteR midway fears no wind!
3 months ago -
@jenny8lee @jimhong it was a photo of a sign on a farm.
3 months ago -
@j_timmer Suffering through the heat out here was just rewarded by a peregrine falcony flying by. Don't see them as often as the hawks.
3 months ago
Site Links
Site Topics
Contributions
- Report Your News
- Add your voice and contribute via your cellphone - check out how to Report News via Your Cellphone
- Blog Widget
- Widget for Blog Owner
