The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

FOXES GUARDING THE HENHOUSE: Yet Another Example of Why Politicians Can’t Be Trusted With Our Money.

Washington : DC : USA | 3 months ago  
Views: 38

FOXES GUARDING THE HENHOUSE: Yet Another Example of Why Politicians Can’t Be Trusted With Our Money.

Less than three months after jockeying for position to stand in front of reporters’ cameras in order to vilify auto executives for flying into Washington DC on private corporate jets to beg for a bailout, the House voted to spend $550 million for eight Air Force planes for use by "senior government officials."

Let’s see, … ‘senior government officials,’ now, who’s on that list? Mmm, oh, yeah, -- like maybe, members of Congress, for instance? Yeah, I think so.

The Pentagon definitely did not request that many. The plan to upgrade the fleet of government jets, which was included in a broader defense-funding bill, has also sparked criticism from the Pentagon, which has said it didn't need half that many new jets.

But that didn't stop a House appropriations subcommittee and its chairman, John Murtha (D-Pa.), from slipping $550 million for them into the defense budget.

The resistance to buying eight Gulfstream and Boeing planes comes as members of both chambers of Congress embark on the busiest month of the year for official overseas travel.

Bipartisan opposition is emerging in the Senate to a plan by House lawmakers to spend $550 million for additional passenger jets for senior government officials.

House Minority Leader John Boehner opposed the jet purchase. Several other senators said they shared the concerns and would work to halt the funding for the jets when the legislation is taken up by the Senate in September, including Sens. John McCain (R., Ariz.,) Jack Reed (D., R.I.), Richard Burr (R., N.C.), Christopher Bond (R., Mo.) and John Thune (R., S.D.).

"The whole thing kind of makes me sick to my stomach," said Sen. Claire McCaskill (D., Mo.) in an interview Sunday. "It is evidence that some of the cynicism about Washington is well placed -- that people get out of touch and they spend money like it's Monopoly money."

The funding for new planes is "a classic example of Congress being out of touch with the realities of deficit spending," said Mr. Thune.

The Obama administration had sought $220 million to buy four passenger jets, including two that are currently being leased by the Air Force, to replace a fleet of older planes. Before leaving town for the August break, House lawmakers doubled the aircraft order to eight, at a total cost of $550 million.

It was only after word leaked out that Murtha saw the error of his ways. Now the House will seek to buy only the four planes the Pentagon wants. Congress will just have to make do.

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon
News Stories
 
  • News Source: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette | 3 months ago
    Sometimes even the House of Representatives can be shamed into doing the right thing. Last week, lawmakers dropped a plan to spend $550 million -- twice the money the Pentagon had requested -- on four Air Force passenger jets for use by senior...
  • News Source: Androscoggin News | 3 months ago
    W hen it came to the controversial purchase of a few extra Gulfstream jets to help politicians bop around the world, well, after a while even the House realized it was time to bail out. The House had planned to spend $550 million to bulk up the...
Posted By firesisle firesisle | 3 months ago
Great article Eddie... LOL; it's amazing how disclosure suddenly creates frugality in Congress.
Posted By EddieBuddha3 EddieBuddha3 | 3 months ago
Thanks, firesisle, and yeah, shining a harsh light on these people's greed in a public venue makes them dance to an entirely different tune.
Posted By EddieBuddha3 EddieBuddha3 | 3 months ago
Thanks, firesisle, and yeah, shining a harsh light on these people's greed in a public venue makes them dance to an entirely different tune.
Posted By mllovric mllovric | 3 months ago
All the air force jets are expendable when it comes to war. 17/8/2009.
Posted By EddieBuddha3 EddieBuddha3 | 3 months ago
Ummm, -- perhaps it should be recognized that the US Air Force has a secondary mission assigned to it. That is, essentially, as an 'air-taxi service' to everyone from the president (Air Force One -- his helicopters are manned and maintained by an entirely other branch of the armed forces) to 'lowly' federal legislators (anybody remember how Newt Gingrich got angry about having to exit Air Force One through the rear of the plane -thus spoiling his opportunity to be photographed next to Mr. Clinton, looking all powerful and everything- that he went back to Congress and, with fellow Republicans, tried to close down the national bureaucracy?).

I have to doubt that any of the vehicles in that fleet will ever be deployed into a combat zone, no matter how pressing the need.
Reported by EddieBuddha3
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @3926296

Most Popular Reports

Related Tweets

  • palafo

    @palafo @robertgdaniel Yeah, that's how it came to my attention. Someone I stopped following was using it.

    3 months ago

Related People

Contributions

Help and Accounts


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.