Local to Global News Report Your News
Sign up now!

Just revealed! Proof of global warming Bush didn’t want the world to see

Seattle : WA : USA | 6 months ago
15 3
Views: 5,958
  • declassified photographs
    declassified photographs
    Posted by: DelilahStarling
    reduction in sea ice between 2006 and 2007
declassified photographs

Canadian Astronaut, Bob Thirsk, made some interesting observations from the International Space Station on Sunday, July 26, 2009.

Thirsk had not seen the glaciers from space for twelve years and he was taken by surprise at the difference he observed—and he felt sad. He saw signs of human destruction as he gazed down at the planet, through a fragile, thin layer of Earth’s atmosphere that protects all life.

This jives with the release of photographs declassified in July, 2009, by the Obama administration, showing striking images of extreme changes in Artic ice near the borders of Alaska.

The U. S. Military had thousands of photographs that were kept secret by the Bush administration. This particular set of photographs emphasizes the dramatic reduction in sea ice along Port of Barrow, Alaska, taken from satellites in July, 2006. Photographs from the same position at the site were taken again in July, 2007. The difference was astonishing. Photographic evidence for 2008 and 2009 don’t give reason to be optimistic about a reversal in the damage.

The pictures are proof of more than 1 million kilometers of vanishing sea ice in 2007 as compared to the previous year is a jaw-dropping loss. Polar bears, seals, and wildlife are already being nudged closer to extinction by melting sea ice, dwindling habitat, and reduced food source.

“These are one-metre resolution images, which give you a big picture of the summer time Arctic”, said Thorsten Markus of Nasa’s Goddard Space Flight Centre.

This new discovery has the head of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Jane Lubchenco very concerned, because there have been no funds to replace aging eye-in-the sky satellite fleet, which has hindered the agency’s ability to keep comprehensive tracking records of climate change.

“Our primary focus is maintaining the continuity of climate observations, and those are at great risk right now, because we don’t have the recourses to have satellites at the ready and taking the kinds of information that we need,” said Luchenco, who was appointed by Obama. “We are playing catch-up.”

In February, 2009, a NASA satellite carrying the first carbon mapping technology crashed three minutes after take-off somewhere near Antarctica.

Steps to rejuvenate America’s scientific climate watching ability has already been undertaken by the Obama administration, with the allotment of $170m to upgrade climate modeling ability at NOAA.

Playing catch-up” is appropriate after eight years of climate change complacency by President George W. Bush, who spent most of his time in office denying that global warming was a problem. His administration damaged relationships with many countries dedicated to climate change regulation, by refusing to sign the Kyoto Accord, in early 2001, claiming it was too expensive and would hurt the U.S. Economy.

The Obama administration has been the best hope we have to restore a leadership position in climate urgency. It is imperative that the climate billed passed by congress, also be passed by the senate, so the president can go to the climate change summit this December in Copenhagen and take a leadership role at the table.

These previously classified photographs, locked away from the American public, illustrate not only the urgency of the vanishing Arctic, but the smugness and apathy of an administration that knowingly placed greed, big oil, and cronyism, above the need to protect a planet, whose entire population could be at risk.

Copyright 2009

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon
Posted By ahol888 Adrian Holman | 6 months ago
Is it really startling that George W. Bush concealed the truth? I thought that Ivy League schools such as Yale were places in which a person could receive a superior education. Mr. Bush graduating from Yale is an apocalyptic moment.
Reply By Ross1776 Ross1776 | 6 months ago
The East Coast blue noses are socialists, and love anything foreign. Or haven't you realized that? They are actually what the founders would call "Tories" today.
Posted By birdpond birdpond | 6 months ago
Too bad there are still deniers who will scoff and offer convoluted circular logic to support their premise that it's really all just a hoax-- or just a 'natural cycle'. They can't accept that humans can cause any damage to the planet.

Reply By Ross1776 Ross1776 | 6 months ago
Sure humans can cause damage. But natural disasters much more. And science can't predict those, so this entire scam for Wall Street is seen for what it is. They have been giving billions to the energy companies since the 1970's for research and development into alternative fuels. And back in the 1970's, it was the environmentalists such as yourself that actually didn't want those "ugly" wind towers in their own backyards so nixed the ideas.

And nuclear generators haven't resulted in cheaper costs for the consumers at all. Arizona's Palo Verde was then "privatized" after the Arizona ratepayeers paid the costs for that nuclear plant. So in effect, our costs went up in order to pay also those shareholder benefits for that public utility company.

So wake up. This is a Wall Street scam and nothing more. Since our planet has been warming since the Ice Age, and that is truth. Or do you deny THAT simple fact?
Posted By mona37 mona37 | 6 months ago
while in reality humans cause the bigger damages to the planet! even the fact of just concealing these facts and truth from the people is a damage to nature in it's self if you know what i mean. we are destructive and it is very sad!
Posted By Righter Righter | 6 months ago
http://amerpundit.com/2008/03/18/icebergs-melting-seals-disappearing-arctic-warming/
It is called cyclical...It has happened before and it will happen again.
Who would you blame because Wisconsin is no longer covered in icebergs?
Posted By Righter Righter | 6 months ago
This is cyclical change. It happened thousands of years ago. No one was here to document it. Who will you blame for the icebergs no longer covering Wisconsin? Ancient animals b.m. must have given off a great deal of heat to cause enough global warming to melt those! It happened in the 1920's? Pull archives of most major papers from the day and you will find that.
Posted By Ross1776 Ross1776 | 6 months ago
What a joke. Since there has been "global warming" since the Ice Age, just what exactly does this prove? And have the scientists been able to predict tomorrow's ice storm, or the path of a hurricane coming within the next week.

Are you another one of those government paid bloggers on some of these sites, spinning propaganda to fit their continued raping of the public for their own "welfare" and best buddies on Wall Street?
Posted By Righter Righter | 6 months ago
Unfortunately, the left is the problem with nuclear energy. Harry Reid will not allow the waste to be disposed in the Nevada desert, which is the only logical dumping ground. Hence, the price has become exorbitant, which is why it can't be used. Dump Harry and we'll have one answer.
And, yes, the left also has one of the biggest culprits against wind power. Ted Kennedy has fought several major experiments with that because sitings were located too near.....You guessed it? The Kennedy Compound on Hyannisport.....
There are enough conspiracies to cover both sides of the aisle. It is just too bad that the major media and people like Delilah Starling are the only ones that some intelligent people listen to regarding this and many other debates.
Please start thinking for yourself. Don't believe these plants from the bho administration, nasa, and the far left.
The truth is painful but, it will set you free.
Unfortunately, no one will provide it to you on a website for free. You will have to dig and find it on your own.
And, I'm still waiting to hear from Ms. Starling and her Nasa colleagues, how they are going to blame George Bush for melting those glaciers that once covered most of my state..........
Reply By Ross1776 Ross1776 | 6 months ago
And the habitat within any state's borders should be their own concern and no one elses - not the federal government's, anyway. Since it is the state residents who live and work there. And that is why the federal government was supposed to have only limited powers and duties.

And minding its own business in this and other areas, and also in some of their foreign policy decisions, certainly would be better for this country, and in turn, also good for the planet.
Reply By Ross1776 Ross1776 | 6 months ago
Yes and aren't you glad they did? Since Wisconsin is quite lovely, also with a great deal of indigenous wildlife. And you know, global warming just might solve the problems that Lousianna has with the wetlands now eroding, and also certainly would keep the Grand Canyon from icing up and disappearing. When God takes something away, he does usually replace it with something better.

That's nature.
Posted By jongleur jongleur | 6 months ago
DelilahStarling, Thank you for sharing this illuminating story. Righter and Ross1776 make no shortage of excuses and rationalizations. Of course large swings in climate are cyclical, but not at the accelerated hyper-destructive pace of recent "progress." Maybe Destructo-George's hot air didn't melt the glaciers directly, but his shameful policies have destroyed them nevertheless. Bush can climb back under the slimy rock he came from and anyone that believes he is any more than a liar and a cheat and a thief can jump under the same rock right there beside him.
- jongleur
Reply By Ross1776 Ross1776 | 6 months ago
Never heard actual "proof" and "evidence," especially of well known history called "excuses."

Must be another one of those politically correct terms such as "racist," when anyone disputes such propaganda.
Reply By Ross1776 Ross1776 | 6 months ago
Actually, the Arctic for the last several years has been in a cooling cycle, but liberals love to spin falsehood and then also expound on it with more falsehood. And the Earth has been on a warming cycle since the Ice Age, and most likely will have another someday rather than the scenario they are projecting. Since all you environmentalists will actually facilitate it with your nonsense.

This is for the utlity companies and Wall Streets profits, and Congress is heavily invested in Wall Street. Are you? As I would imagine most that are stock investors probably (mostly men) are behind this for their little ego trips - since Wall Street is like Vegas, and gaming and gambling one of a many premier pasttimes.

So I would imagine you've got some holdings, and one of those in the propaganda mill. Or work for a utility company, or an industry which will benefit from this garbage at the public's expense.

Since most liberals are socialists, after all, and want everyone and anyone to pay for their agendas, rather than work for a living.
Reply By birdpond birdpond | 6 months ago
Ross1776, if it's really just an evil liberal plot by us utility workers and eco-terrorists so we can raise taxes on innocent conservatives, then why is concern about climate change a GLOBAL issue that the United States has been dragging its feet in addressing?

Tree-huggers' conspiracy?

Why does the March/April issue of Archaeology contain an article on how climate change is already damaging archaeological sites around the world? Bodies in ancient burial sites thousands of years old have now started to rot!

Please don't tell us it's a world-wide plot by Al Gore to institute a Global Energy Tax. That just sounds paranoid and desperate.
Reply By DelilahStarling DelilahStarling | 6 months ago
Birdpond, very insightful information to bring to the table.

As for Ross1776, in the words of Shakespere, "the lady doth protest too much".

Anyone who makes as much noise as he does: clammering, name calling, stomping up and down to make everyone pay attention to his views, usually does so out of desperation, paranoia, and personal fear. Fear that they could be proven wrong and then their head would have to explode.

I appreciate everyone's opinions, but when they are expressed with such dogmatic, disrespectful, and insulting dialog, they will not be taken seriously.

Thanks for your support birdpong!


Reply By DelilahStarling DelilahStarling | 6 months ago
jongleur, Thank you! I do enjoy the colorful way you describe things:))

As for the Bush/Cheney administration; I feel angry that they essentially bogged down U.S. progress on every vital issue for eight years. It will truly go down in history as the worst administration on any substantial level to disgrace the office...ever.
Reply By Ross1776 Ross1776 | 6 months ago
Obama is far worse. He's not a Constitutional lawyer, that's for sure. Not even a lawyer at all actually.

So his subterfuge as far as his background and experience was even greater than Bush's. And is campaign rhetoric actually much worse insofar as just these short six months. What a buffoon. Looks great in front of a teleprompter, but behind closed doors is worse than even Nixon at this point. Who was far worse than Bush, really, although there hasn't been a good leader in this country for literally decades.

Since they are all members of the same club. The CFR and their "global government" socialistic agenda, while waving the flag and referring to the founders who they bury with their treason each and every day they are in Washington.

Don't know what planet you are on Delilah, but it sure isn't this one.
Reply By Ross1776 Ross1776 | 6 months ago
Haven't you noticed that the war is still going on, and has been escalated by Obama. Or does that fact escape you attention, since that is the biggest drain still on our economy, and illegal to begin with? And Obama's laying off all those "middle class" GM workers and "Joe the Plumbers" he vowed he would support. And just entered into that "Cap and Trade" that will erase that piddly $600 tax credit (since the annual costs to the ratepayer for that legislation is over $4,000 per year).

Do those little "details" escape the liberal radar?
Posted By Righter Righter | 6 months ago
Starling's credentials as a certified liberal who can only see things from one side speak for themself: The Daily Kos....
Liberal socialism at its best. If it were a newspaper it would kill the birds whose cages it lined.
Reply By jongleur jongleur | 6 months ago
Righter, I do respect your opinions, but Wow you're just so dramatic spewing such flippant labels--only your ego is more gargantuan than that judgmental chip on your shoulder.
- jongleur
Reply By DelilahStarling DelilahStarling | 6 months ago
Gee, Righter. I see I have a fan. Thanks for following my work.
Posted By 4everfaded 4everfaded | 6 months ago
I heard George Carlin say on stage that we are so arrogant to think we in any way will destroy this planet.The fact is,just thru ignorance,we can and probably will destroy almost all life on earth.Our exsistance on this rock can be measured by earths time as a few blinks of an eye.On the same stage Carlin said we were put on this earth to produce plastic.The one thing mother earth could not produce herself.She had all the ingrdients but not the apposable thumbs.As far as cycles on earth goes,ignorance dictates we are the center of our universe.I read that in 2012 we will be exposed to the real galactic center without one of our planets to block the gamma rays for a period of time we may not survive.Go to You Tube and search for perpetual energy and stop talking conspiracies and stsrt knowing.Look up tha name Tesla and his affiliation with a man called Chase.Then I strongly recomend searching under 2003 comets almost colliding with our sun.That one and the energy video are to me the most amazing,eye opening reason we need to know and stop assuming.
Reply By Ross1776 Ross1776 | 6 months ago
Thank DuPont for the plastic. The French. Wouldn't you know.
Posted By RandallKlopping Randall Klopping | 6 months ago
It just endlessly astounds me the lengths to which human being will go to evade the truth / reality! Especially with something as evident and dangerous as global warming!!!
Reply By 4everfaded 4everfaded | 6 months ago
Reality,what a concept.Belief has overtaken truth.Image is everything.
Why is the word that unlocks Reason.
Reply By RandallKlopping Randall Klopping | 6 months ago
With the grammar I am having to guess, are you claiming it doesn't exist?
Reply By jongleur jongleur | 6 months ago
RandallKlopping, Well stated and the lies and misinformation and discombobulated rhetoric boggle my brain. With such obvious evidence of global warming, the naysayers must be hallucinating or just from another planet. Terrific to have another pragmatic "voice of reason" here at Allvoices!
- jongleur
Reply By RandallKlopping Randall Klopping | 6 months ago
I've spent hundreds of hours studying the research papers and going through the evidence. Every time I try to debate it with those who still refuse to believe its funny because they can never provide and scientific evidence but try to post links to blogs as evidence... LOL... I have access to multiple science databases and being that I'm stuck in a bed anyway, I've got lots of time to do my homework.
Posted By firesisle firesisle | 6 months ago
I find it interesting that the crab fishermen on the Bering Sea reported that this year's ice was the worst they ever remember. They fish in it every year and have for many, many years. I think they should have a pretty good idea...
Reply By RandallKlopping Randall Klopping | 6 months ago
firesisle - for the same reason that all of California's mountains last year showed drastic snow decrease with the exception of one that set a new record in snowfall. Weather patterns shift.
Reply By firesisle firesisle | 6 months ago
Exactly; what does it look like in 2008, or even 2009? A Google map search for Barrow, Alaska, in the satellite view, shot in 2009, shows lots and lots of pack ice. Unfortunately, it doesn't give the month it was taken.
Reply By RandallKlopping Randall Klopping | 6 months ago
That is because google map is using data several years old. I've heard some talk though don't know if true, that google hopes to get it set up so it always relatively current.
Posted By firesisle firesisle | 6 months ago
That may be true... I know the time stamp on the picture said 2009. I'd love some current data....
Reply By RandallKlopping Randall Klopping | 6 months ago
I suspect it is because there are security issues involved but that is only a guess.
Posted By firesisle firesisle | 6 months ago
It's true that the entire North-West Passage was free of ice in 2007; but anyone who wants to seriously do their homework will find that it's not anything new; the North-West Passage had also been open for shipping in 1945, and, in 1903, the great Norwegian explorer Amundsen had passed through it in a sailing ship. It's not global warming, it's normal climatic cycling.

The satellite photos have only been archived for the last 29 years;
Posted By Juggernaut180 Jim Johnston | 6 months ago
So here’s my 2 cents for what they’re worth (not a great deal given the current global economic downturn, no doubt).
We seem to live in an age where the majority are educated to a standard greater than at any time previously. Partly because of widely available education systems and partly because of far wider access to all sorts of information once outside of those education systems for continued learning.
Unfortunately, it seems difficult, especially with the advent of the internet, to determine what information is correct, what has been adjusted to suit one parties view and what is just blame bullsh*t.
The global warming argument is a case in point. I would hope we can all agree there have been changes in the global weather. It certainly seems to be agreed that the ice sheets are melting. What isn’t agreed is the cause for this.
But because we live in an age with so much information available, and as we have the educations to allow us to take on board information and form opinions, we decide individually to take up a position on the global warming debate. However, any information we take to decide and then support our position is based on hearsay evidence, as none of us, I suspect, have conducted the studies or surveys we refer to in our supporting arguments. We rely heavily on those evidence sources to be correct and, more importantly, correctly interpreted and, in this day and age, this is probably the single most difficult thing to be assured of.
So, given that even now scientists whose lives are devoted to the study of this phenomenon cannot agree absolutely as to whether global warming is or is not a man made issue or simple weather cycle, it is not surprising that we can do little to resolve the issue amongst ourselves when debating the same following this story.
Posted By spike-breaker08 Haven | 4 months ago
discovered or not discovered, we must all act to save the mother every single day..

Related Allvoices Contributions

News Stories
 
  • News Source: Uinta County News | 6 months ago
    The United States released more than a thousand intelligence images of Arctic ice to help scientists study the impact of climate change, within hours of a recommendation by the National Academy of Sciences. In an unusually fast move by a US...
Blogs
 >
  • Blog Source: www.energybulletin.net
    Indeed, last month the administration released a report, produced under NOAA's leadership, detailing the effects that global warming is already having on the U.S. and the impacts it is likely to have in the future. ...
  • Blog Source: climatechangepsychology.blogspot.com
    Graphic images that reveal the devastating impact of global warming in the Arctic have been released by the US military. The photographs, taken by spy satellites over the past decade, confirm that in recent years vast areas in high latitudes ... The
  • Blog Source: www.truthout.org
    The NOAA is under additional pressure to provide environmental data because of the re-emergence of the El Niño climate phenomenon, where warming of the tropical Pacific causes heatwaves, droughts and flooding around the world. ...
Videos
 >
 
Reported by DelilahStarling
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @3780053

Most Popular Reports

Related Tweets

Related Allvoices Reports

Related People


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.