The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

House passes Clean Energy bill

By: wotznew send a private message
Washington : DC : USA | 5 months ago  
Views: 29

The American Clean Energy and Security Act passed in the House of Representatives by a narrow margin of votes, 219-212. Nonetheless, this marks a move towards making a change in America, rather than politics as usual. And it is a victory for President Obama, who considers this bill one of his current top goals since it was a campaign pledge.

The bill, as most of this nature are, is rather comprehensive and therefore complex. But in a nutshell, its primary theme is aimed at the world climate, and is considered to slow the amount of global warming by capping carbon pollution and charging companies that pollute, while striving to make clean energy cheaper and allow for a wider profit margin. By doing so, it will create new energy-related research and development jobs, as well as inevitably lead to the formation of new energy companies or new divisions of existing companies. Obama clearly calls this a "jobs bill."

The Republicans have countered calling it an existing jobs killer and an energy tax. It is reported that Warren Buffet concurs that this should be considered a huge new tax. Regarding how it will affect the American public, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that the results of this bill will end up costing the average household an additional $175 a year.

A contributing factor to why the bill passed in the House is the broad-based sectors support. Besides House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic party, the bill has received some unlikely support from power companies, labor unions that include those of polluting companies (i.e. steel), large corporations, and even the agricultural sector.

Part of the general opposing argument was that by penalizing companies that pollute in the United States, they would move operations to countries that do not have such penalties. But the bill also includes stipulations to invoke a tariff on products from countries that don't start to reduce their carbon footprint by a certain date. In Obama's words, the bill is "balanced and sensible."

Before the vote, House Minority Leader John Boehner of Ohio stated, "This will be a defining moment and a defining vote in this Congress." How prophetic those words have become.

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon

Related Allvoices Contributions

News Stories
 
  • Submitted By: StuDio | 5 months ago
    The American Clean Energy and Security Act passed in the House of Representatives by a narrow margin of votes, 219-212.  Nonetheless, this marks a move towards making a change in America, rather than politics as usual.  And it is a ...
  • News Source: Uinta County News | 5 months ago
    Speaker Nancy Pelosi issued the following statement on unemployment numbers for June issued today by the Department of Labor . "Today's unemployment numbers are another reminder of the years of failure to invest in making Americans the most highly...
  • News Source: Uinta County News | 5 months ago
    I was pleased to see Rep. John Salazar went against his party to oppose the American Clean Energy and Security Act Friday. The bill, which supposedly seeks to reduce carbon emissions by 80 percent in 2050, is in reality, a tax upon the working class...
  • News Source: Mother Jones | 5 months ago
    The climate bill is a "piece of sh*t" (that family-values crowd sure has a way with words)...Here's an assessment of the bill by Dennis Kucinich: The bill allows two billion tons of carbon dioxide a year, roughly equivalent to 30 percent of all US...
  • News Source: The New York Observer | 5 months ago
    On June 26, 2009 the House of Representatives took the historic step of passing the first piece of U.S. legislation to reduce emissions of greenhouse gasses.  While the bill, like all legislation, is not perfect, it is a giant step in the right...
  • News Source: The Washington Times | 5 months ago
    The 1,000-page-plus climate-change bill the House passed last week, as was the case with President Obama's economic stimulus bill, was written with very little time for many to have read the final version. And House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, California...
Blogs
 >
  • Blog Source: scaredmonkeys.com
    Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) had a few choice words about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-Calif.) landmark climate-change bill after its passage Friday. When asked why he read portions of the cap-and-trade bill on the floor Friday night,
  • Blog Source: www.truthout.org
    Pelosi, Waxman, Hoyer, Clyburn, Markey and Larson. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, flanked by Congress members, discusses the Clean Energy and Security Act, which passed a House vote yesterday. (Photo: Getty Images). Washington - In a ...
  • Blog Source: chicagobluesgirl.com
    Increase environmentally-safe energy production on remote lands and far off our shores; Promote the use of alternative fuels that will reduce carbon emissions, such as nuclear, clean-coal, and renewable energy technologies; and ... 2 Responses to
  • Blog Source: www.huffingtonpost.com
    On Friday, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) delayed a vote on the American Clean Energy and Security Act with a nearly hour-long speech. He knew the Republicans didn't have enough votes to defeat the bill. ... Pelosi showed she is on the
  • Blog Source: restoretherepublic.com
    On Friday afternoon, the United States House of Representatives passed the “Cap and Trade” bill, formally titled the “American Clean Energy and Security Act.” This bill has been touted as the legislation that will save American jobs ...
  • Blog Source: www.huffingtonpost.com
    Knowing that he didn't have the votes to stop the clean energy jobs bill, Republican Minority leader John Boehner instead turned to a tactic familiar those who want stand in the way of progress -- delay. ... Always a model of grace, Speaker Nancy
Videos
 >
 
  • Posted By Write4Life Write4Life | 5 months ago
    Obama is opposing the tariff. Stating it would be unfair to burden other countries that are in recession.

    In addition, 44 Demiocrats voted No - all from Coal states.

    Your figure of $175 per family per year has a lot of dispute and the support from power companies is due to the massive lobbying campaign that resulted in their being awarded a majority of the "free" allowances.

    It's nothing more than business as usual and the result will be job losses all for the smallest of temperature changes - over a CENTURY and not at all if other nations do not curb their pollution amounts.

    So the question I would graciously ask now - would be - Do YOU think the Senate should STILL endorse the bill if the tariff measure is removed and would you still stick to the theory the bill will not cause manufacturers to shift operations to China nad India where LABOR is already cheaper?
  • Posted By StuDio StuDio | 5 months ago
    Anyone who followed the debate Friday afternoon heard how shallow and weak the arguments in favor of this piece of … legislatiion … are. Statistics proving this kind of plan had not worked in Spain or Japan were undisputed. All the suppporters could do was to sputter back the normal "global warming" and "the end of the world is near" rhetoric. What passed this piece of … legisltation … in the House was not the sound arguments but the blatant arm-twisting of fence-sitting Democrats and weak0willed Republicans. Those eight - Bono Mack, Carlisle, Kirk, Lance, LoBiondo, McHugh, and Reichert - will need to be watched carefully to see what inticements the White House dangled in front of them to win their support.

    In the meantime, the Republican leadership should have those eight seats moved across the aisle because these are certainly not "representatives" of the people.
  • Reply By Write4Life Write4Life | 5 months ago
    Completely correct!
  • Reported by wotznew
    Report Your News Got a similar story?
    Add it to the network!

    Or add related content to this report

    Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @3559379

    Most Popular Reports

    Related Tweets

    Related Allvoices Reports

    Related People

    Contributions

    Help and Accounts


    Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

    © Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.