Local to Global News Report Your News
Sign up now!

Whaling industry supported by tax-payer money

By: birdpond send a private message
Gland : Switzerland | 7 months ago
6 0
Views: 5,241
  • Graphic chronology of key dates in the fight over whaling
    Graphic chronology of key dates in the fight over whaling
    Source: AFP
Graphic chronology of key dates in the fight over whaling

Gland, Switzerland: According to a news release dated June 18, 2009 by the World Wildlife Fund, the governments of Norway and Japan are using taxpayer money to subsidize their unprofitable whaling industries. This is the conclusion from a first-time analysis of the economics of whaling.

It is no wonder that the industry is failing. Public outcry against whaling is growing, harvestable numbers of cetaceans are dwindling, and the market price for the meat is dropping, due in part to mounting evidence that the meat is unfit for human consumption (see my story on the Japanese dolphin slaughter.)

The report goes on to say:

Sink or Swim: The Economics of Whaling Today found that Norway and Japan provide commercial whalers with huge government subsidies—even though killing whales is unlikely to ever be profitable without taxpayer support.

"In this time of global economic crisis, the use of valuable tax dollars to prop up what is basically an economically unviable industry, is neither strategic, sustainable, nor an appropriate use of limited government funds," said Dr Susan Lieberman, Species Programme Director, WWF International.

The analysis considers a range of direct and indirect costs associated with whaling and the processing and marketing of whale products, such as whale meat. Researchers conclude that these costs, combined with declining demand for whale meat and the risk of negative impacts such as trade or tourism boycotts, make commercial whaling unlikely to produce benefits for either country's economies or taxpayers.

In Norway, for example, the government since 1992 has spent more than US$4.9 million on public information, public relations, and lobbying campaigns to garner support for its whaling and seal hunting industries, according to the report. In addition, government subsidies for the whaling industry have equaled almost half of the gross value of all whale meat landings made through the Rafisklaget, the Norwegian Fishermen's Sales Organisation.

The report notes similar use of taxpayer funds by Japan. During the 2008-09 season, the Japanese whaling industry, for example, needed US$12 million in taxpayer money just to break even. Overall, Japanese subsidies for whaling amount to US$164 million since 1988.

Other major findings in the report include:

  • Wholesale prices of whale meat per kg in Japan have been falling since 1994, starting at just over $30/kg in 1994, and declining to $16.40 in 2006.
  • Norway has spent an additional US$10.5 million covering the costs of an inspection programme from 1993 until 2006, when it was scrapped due to the losses it was causing the country's whalers. Japan and Norway, in defiance of the International Whaling Commission's moratorium on commercial whaling, kill up to 2,000 whales a year, exploiting loopholes in the IWC's founding treaty that allow whaling under 'objection' to management decisions (Norway) and "scientific" whaling for research purposes (Japan).

Ahead of the 61st IWC meeting next week, researchers point out that killing more whales likely would hurt whale-watching and tourism, trade, and the international image of Norway and Japan – impacts which would far outweigh any economic benefits of whaling.

The release concludes:

"It is clear that whaling is heavily subsidised at present . . . In both Japan and Norway, substantial funds are made available to prop up an operation which would otherwise be commercially marginal at best, and most likely loss making."

"Norway and Japan are hurting tourism, a potential growth industry in both countries in order to spend millions of dollars obtaining whale meat, the sale of which makes no profit," said Sue Fisher, WDCS US Policy Director. "How much longer are they going to keep wasting their taxpayer's money?"

Forcing tax-payers to fund this unsound, unpopular, controversial and bloody industry is adding insult to injury.

For more information please see the links on the sidebar.

The analysis was conducted by independent economists eftec and commissioned by WWF and the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society.

IWC 61 is being held in Madeira, Portugal, from 22-26 June.

About WWF

WWF, http://www.worldwildlife.org/, is one of the world's largest and most respected independent conservation organizations, with almost 5 million supporters and a global network active in over 100 countries. WWF's mission is to stop the degradation of the earth's natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by conserving the world's biological diversity, ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable, and promoting the reduction of pollution and wasteful consumption.

About WDCS

WDCS, http://www.wdcs.org/, the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society, is the global voice for the protection of cetaceans (whales, dolphins and porpoises) and their environment. Established in 1987, WDCS has offices in Argentina, Australia, Austria, Germany, the UK and the USA and a worldwide network of consultants, researchers and supporters. WDCS aims to reduce and ultimately eliminate the continuing threats to whales, dolphins and their habitats and to raise awareness of these wonderful animals and the need to protect them in their natural environment. WDCS's work combines concern for the welfare of the individual animals with efforts to ensure the protection of entire species, populations and their habitats.

To see Cathy's other stories please click here.

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon
Posted By saralemaster saralemaster | 7 months ago
whaling is hideous. I can't believe Switzerland, of all places, is supporting this.
Posted By Changez Changez | 7 months ago
Honestly, what is the point of the whaling industry? Commercial whaling kills several thousand whales every years and that does not include illegal whaling activity. It is not even a profitable industry anymore and whale meat is so full of toxins and poisons it is hardly worth eating. Already the populations of humpback and sperm whales are near extinction. Do we really need to debate on whether such a destructive and barbaric practice need continue simply because some governments have an emotional attachment to it.
Posted By AdnanYounus AdnanYounus | 2 months ago
nice report, gud thinking, keep it up
News Stories
 
  • News Source: The Observer | 7 months ago
    International talks on the future of whaling ended in shambles last night, with no deal between pro- and anti-whaling nations, and the outgoing whaling commission chairman suggesting more whales could be saved if the ban on commercial whaling was...
  • News Source: Lexington Herald-Leader | 7 months ago
    There's only one more year," Hogarth told the AP. "If not, then it's over and we'll have to look at the IWC ... (at) how it functions in the future." Trying to find a compromise between countries that want to keep killing whales and those who say it...
  • News Source: Labor Herald | 7 months ago
    Speaking at a briefing on the World Wildlife Fund's (WWF) report Small cetaceans: the forgotten whales at the 61st International Whaling Commission meeting in Madeira, Portugal, the Minister said this substantial financial contribution will enhance...
  • News Source: The Age | 7 months ago
    The plight of small whales is being overshadowed by their larger counterparts, environmental group WWF says. It says small whales, dolphins and porpoises are disappearing from the world's oceans and waterways as they fall victim to fishing gear,...
  • News Source: United Press International | 7 months ago
    Leisel Jones , an Australian Olympic champion swimmer, presented a petition against the taking of whales Tuesday to the International Whaling Commission. The petition's 15,000 signatures were gathered by the World Society for the Protection of...
  • News Source: The Daily Telegraph | 7 months ago
    He was speaking on the second day of the IWC conference in Portugal, where pro and anti-whaling countries are thrashing out the issue of whether to permit increased hunting of the marine mammals. "The bottom line is clear," said Mr Garrett, who...
Blogs
 >
  • Blog Source: globalgeopolitics.net
    "If you can't sell to your friends, and the three biggest fisheries companies in Japan have already said they don't even want Japanese whale meat, then there is no possibility that there is a viable export market from Iceland to Japan," said Wakao
  • Blog Source: acs-iwc.blogspot.com
    Other issues that will be discussed include everything from the effects of global warming on cetaceans, Iceland possibly joining the European Union and the possible implications for its whaling program, toxins in whale meat and many ...
  • Blog Source: acs-iwc.blogspot.com
    a) Greenland states an increased need for whale meat due to a 9% expansion in their human population, but this expansion is in the entire population of Greenland, not just the native community; b) Meat from a subsistence hunt is ...
  • Blog Source: sassyclassy1.blogspot.com
    Since the 1960s' save-the-whale movement started in California, we have made some progress reversing the momentum toward extinction that came from centuries of whaling. Despite global campaigns, whale meat is still sold in a number of nations. There
Videos
 >
 
Reported by birdpond
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @3520179

Most Popular Reports

Related Allvoices Reports


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.