The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

It's Time to Bailout Homeowners

By: Faugh send a private message
Mill Valley : CA : USA | 5 months ago  
Views: 54

The whole idea that the U.S. banks should continue to be in charge of mortgage lending is preposterous. Currently, the banks have received endless amounts of bailout funds (TARP) from the United States government, money they received for free, and are very slow lending that money out to needy homeowners. This whole fiscal mass is the result of the housing downturn. We need to get cheap mortgages to the homeowners. The U. S. government should be the agent for all of those loans, bypassing the U.S. banks, the ones who got us in this mess in the first place

These loans should be very low interest, say about 3%, thereby reestablishing equity in almost every home in America that is underwater. Our entire economy is one that is based on the spending habits of the consumer. That consumer for the most part has been drawing those funds from the increased equity in their homes.

We need to restore values to the American homeowner, just as we are restoring those values to capitalism and American business. This kind of action would be a great long-term investment in America.

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon

Related Allvoices Contributions

News Stories
 
  • News Source: San Bernadino County Sun | 5 months ago
    They said that a year ago while home values continued plunging, but nowadays straddling the fence too long could mean the difference between getting a great bargain or losing it. Welcome to home shopper's limbo, a place from which David and Denise...
  • News Source: Guardian Unlimited | 5 months ago
    There was rare positive news on repossessions today after the body representing UK mortgage lenders said it had overestimated the number of people who were likely to lose their homes this year. But the announcement by the Council of Mortgage Lenders (...
  • News Source: Sify News | 5 months ago
    A number of executives of banks that received federal bailout money have continued to use corporate jets for personal use despite controversy over such perks, according to a report Friday. The Wall Street Journal said flight records show that...
  • News Source: Los Angeles Times | 5 months ago
    Rising Treasury bond yields show Wall Street is concerned that the agency's policy may lead to an inflationary bubble. The risk is that higher interest rates will hold back the economic recovery. Bloomberg News June 22, 2009 Rising Treasury bond...
  • News Source: The Age | 5 months ago
    The corporate regulator and Financial Literacy Board have launched a guide to reverse mortgage products. The guide, "Thinking of using the equity in your home?" has been designed to assist homeowners considering such products.
  • News Source: Las Vegas Review-Journal / Sun | 5 months ago
    It comes after months of badgering Washington Mutual to work with him on a loan modification or some type of relief until business picks up again. After all, he hears frequent reports of the government's plan to help troubled homeowners avoid...
Blogs
 >
  • Blog Source: thegioicuaann.blogspot.com
    And even as the United States began to execute its bailout plan, the tactics continued to shift, with the Treasury announcing that it would spend some of the funds to buy commercial paper, a vital form of short-term borrowing for businesses ...
  • Blog Source: www.totalnoid.com
    Bank of Kansas, which is based in South Hutchinson, acquired all of First National Bank of Anthony's $156.9 million deposits. It also purchased the bulk of the failed bank's $156.9 million worth of assets. ...
  • Blog Source: wildcatobservations.blogspot.com
    We were asked—or required—to expand lending, to conserve capital while providing liquidity, to meet housing goals for the underserved, to serve shareholders and homeowners alike. … I wish I had gone to the government and ... Is it any wonder
  • Blog Source: roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com
    Gray Davis because voters saw his administration as corrupt and devoted to big-government schemes, such as raising the dreaded car tax. New leadership promised to abolish that tax and to end unsustainable deficit spending. ...
  • Blog Source: www.huffingtonpost.com
    Moreover, it is not just banks but government itself that must be deleveraged -- the opposite of what is happening now with bailouts. Thyssen's solution is to encourage government regulation, oversight and investment in commercial banking, ... in a
  • Blog Source: pressing4truth.blogspot.com
    It would mean considering pro-free-market remedies such as letting banks foreclose, letting prices reach market levels, letting bad banks fail, dismantling Fannie and Freddie, ending bailout promises and getting rid of the Fed's power to manipulate
Videos
 >
 
Posted By ChrisJonesLehi ChrisJonesLehi | 5 months ago
So many problems with this idea, I hardly know where to start.

1. A program like this would cost the US gov't about $4 trillion. That money can be obtained by doing one of two things - raising our taxes or printing the money and causing inflation to explode. Which would be your choice?

2. A program like that would not "restore equity" to homeowners. It is not interest rates, which are laughably low even now, but property values, that determine equity positions. If you decreed that every loan in the US were now at 3%, that would not restore any property's ridiculously inflated previous "value"

3. Creditworthy homeowners that have equity are already refinancing in droves. So this program would be for a) non credit-worthy borrowers or b) those with no equity, meaning that the US government would now be holding millions of fixed-rate notes that are worth less than face value. This is a good idea?

4. There is no provision or authority in the Constitution for the government to do this. It would absolutely be struck down.

5. All economies are based on consumers. The problem is that the US consumer was financing his spending by borrowing the money instead of earning it first. Until that changes, no plan will help. Your idea makes the problem WORSE, not better.

6. Even if this program were not unconstitutional, which it is, or destructive, which it also is, it's impossible. Every homeowner in America would apply for this loan. To WHOM? The DMV? There is ZERO federal apparatus to administer a program of this scope. Think, just for a second, about how many loan officers, processors, and underwriters you'd have to hire, and how fast, in order to even start this. Think of how many MILLION workers would be fired as every mortgage loan job in the US dried up, along with all the support staff.

7. It would be cheaper, and much faster, for the government to just hire everyone in the US at $55,000 a year and pay them to do nothing. Yes, the economy would immediately collapse, but since that's where you're headed with this anyway, wouldn't it be a lot faster and easier if you didn't have to produce your W2s in the meantime?

I strongly, strongly recommend some reading on basic economic theory before making proposals of this kind.
Posted By InspectorGadget InspectorGadget | 5 months ago
Maybe we need to get you in that board room with the entire economic team. However, at least the housing market has been showing signs of picking up. Looks like people are starting to buy again.
Reported by Faugh
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @3508540

Most Popular Reports

Related Allvoices Reports

Contributions

Help and Accounts


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.