In today's WTF story, a United States Circuit Court of Appeals denied a mother's claim when she tried to apply for social security benefits from the dead father of her child, who was born via in-vitro fertilization through his sperm that was extracted after death and implanted 4 years post-mortum. The ruling cited the reason for the denial being that the girl was not dependent upon the social security money at the time of his death in 1995. After his death, his sperm was taken and frozen where in 1999 his widow gave birth to the daughter.
(Sources: AZ Central 'No Benefits for LA girl born from dead man's sperm'. Associated Press. Jun. 18, 2009 09:52 AM)
Unfortunately the above article did not cite why the mother applied for 'Child Surivor' benefits from the Social Security Administration when the child was born 4 years after the father's death. The ruling should not come as a surprise to anyone; however given the fact that the mother waited almost 4 years after her husband's death to have the child and subsequently file for the benefits should provide sufficient explanation for the woman's general state of mind.