I read a news headline this morning that said the US is refusing to recognize Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as the elected head of Iran. As I read the news story, I found that the headline was inaccurate. The only reaction from the US had been that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that she hoped the results of the Iranian election reflected the desires of the Iranian people. This is not exactly a "refusal" to recognize the results of the election. And even if the US does refuse to recognize Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as the legitimate democratically elected President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, so what? The US apparently does not have a problem with recognizing the following unelected heads of state:
King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz of Saudi Arabia
"President" Hosni Mubarak of Egypt
King Abdullah II of Jordan
King Mohammad VI of Morocco
Emir Sabah Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah of Kuwait
Emir Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al Thani of Qatar
Sultan Qaboos bin Said al Said of Oman
King Hamad bin Issa al Khalifa of Bahrain
"President" Khalifa bin Zayed al Nahyan of the United Arab Emirates
"President" Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority, a despicable man who launched a coup against the democratically elected government of Hamas, declared himself "President," and then violated the Palestinian Constitution by extending his term for another year even though his term expired January 9, 2009.
The United States of America is not satisfied with having its Shahs ruling the Arab world.
Barack Obama wishes to have another pro-US Shah ruling Iran as well.