The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

Buchanan becoming more and more racist

Glendale : CA : USA | 6 months ago  
Views: 2,178
  • US Supreme Court nominee and Federal Appeals Court judge Sonia Sotomayor (C)
    US Supreme Court nominee and Federal Appeals Court judge Sonia ...
    Source: AFP

I want to cast my vote for Pat Buchanan as the creepiest person in America.

I used to love to read his columns, just because he wrote so well, but I've gotten to the point where I can no longer stand what he's saying. Besides, to steal a line from the late, great Molly Ivins, they were better in the original German.

If you have been watching cable news the last week or two, Buchanan has been all over the place presenting the white racist position on Judge Sonia Sotomayor's nomination to the Supreme Court.

I suppose we should probably cut Buchanan some slack. He'll be 71 later this year and it's clear that his bile ducts aren't working as well as they once did. He's getting quite a bit of backup and some of it is coming out of his mouth.

Buchanan doubtless views himself as one of the last defenders of the white race, and he fears we're going to be overrun by all the little brown people if we don't stand strong.

"What is happening now to white men right now is exactly what was done to black folks for years."

I suppose he means white men are being castrated or killed for looking at black women, or maybe it's all those lynchings of white men we've been hearing about.

Pat, with all due respect, you're nuts.

Looney tunes.

Around the bend.

A taco short of a combination plate, a few bricks shy of a load, a couple of sandwiches short of a picnic.

Your elevator isn't going to the top floor.

The saddest part of all this is that he doesn't get called on those statements. If I were to go on MSNBC and tell them that aliens from the planet Zartek were speaking to me through my fillings and telling me to prepare the world for an invasion, I would expect someone to tell me I was batshit crazy.

Not our Pat. He's an elder statesman.

Of course, so was Gabby Hayes.

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon

Related Allvoices Contributions

News Stories
 
  • News Source: United Press International | 6 months ago
    House Speaker New Gingrich Sunday backed off earlier comments that Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor was a racist. Appearing on CBS's "Face the Nation," Gingrich said he had "reframed" his thoughts about Sotomayor. Gingrich last month said...
  • News Source: The Guardian | 6 months ago
    You do not choose to be a son or a daughter," argues Kwame ­Anthony Appiah in The Ethics of Identity . "A Serb or a Bosnian; a Korean or an Mbuti ... In all sorts of ways ... our identities are neither wholly scripted for us nor wholly scripted by...
  • News Source: The Hill | 6 months ago
    So I think those who oppose her nomination would like to create a side debate by taking her words out of context.” On CBS's “Face the Nation,” Axelrod criticized Gingrich and others who have leveled the racism charge. “I was gratified that...
  • News Source: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette | 6 months ago
    Newt Gingrich retracted an ugly, vicious lie he said about federal appeals judge and Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor. The former House speaker had accused her of being a "racist" for saying in 2001: "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with...
  • News Source: News 24 | 6 months ago
    The American right has unleashed a campaign to portray Barack Obama's supreme court nominee, Sonia Sotomayor, as racist for suggesting white men don't always make the best judges -- and as un-American for using the Spanish pronunciation of her name.
  • News Source: The Guardian | 6 months ago
    If Sonia Sotomayor , Obama's nominee for the United States Supreme Court, is confirmed this summer, she will be the first Hispanic to serve on the court in the country's history...Sotomayor is a 54-year-old, self-described "Nuyorican", a child of...
Blogs
 >
  • Blog Source: tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com
    "In her world," Buchanan wrote yesterday of Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor, "equal justice takes a back seat to tribal justice." "How can any Republican senator vote to elevate to the Supreme Court a judge who, all her life, ...
  • Blog Source: www.tagg-lines.com
    Buchanan: Sotomayor Practices "Tribal Justice". "In her world," Buchanan wrote yesterday of Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor, "equal justice takes a back seat to tribal justice." ...
  • Blog Source: mediamatters.org
    Given that record, it seems absurd to say that Judge Sotomayor allows race to infect her decisionmaking. Previously: Buchanan says Sotomayor's purported discrimination against "white males" similar to "what was done in the South" ...
  • Blog Source: tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com
    As I noted earlier today, Buchanan often saves his most controversial polemics for readers of the conservative magazine Human Events, which runs his column twice a week. Yesterday, in that column, he accused Sotomayor of practicing ...
  • Posted By Changez Changez | 6 months ago
    Pat buchanon has always been on the right-conservative side and lately that means defending the positions and money owned by a lot of old white men like himself. I guess it's unsurprising to find him spewing over Sotomayor's nomination since the president is already a black man. In any case there has been a lot of talk about Sotomayor, even here.
  • Posted By JerrySatire JerrySatire | 6 months ago
    The sad part is, Pat Buchanan enjoys being a racist. In his mind this country should always be run by non-Jewish, white men. How sad is that? [:-[
    JerrySatire@aol.com www.Lampoon.net
  • Posted By bwinwright bwinwright | 6 months ago
    Patrick Buchanan is one of the Jesuit General's key people in the American media. He is a Roman Catholic, trained at the Jesuit controlled Georgetown University, and is a master at propaganda. What most do not understand is that the Jesuits control both the left and the right in America. Criminals like Bill Clinton, also controlled by the Jesuits and trained at Georgetown University, and the Bush family and Buchanan are all good buddies behind the scenes. It's much like WWF wrestling. It's all fake, completely controlled from behind the scenes.

    Just look at the supreme court today. Of the 9 justices, how many are currently Roman Catholic. Could it be 5? And, of course, what religion do you suppose Sotomayor might be?

    No folks, the internet has helped clear away the smoke screen of lies and deceit. While most are distracted by the fake bickering between the left and the right, the Jesuit General and his Rothschild-led central banking trillionaires are pulling all the strings from behind the scenes.

    Men like Patrick Buchanan, Henry Kissinger, and Zbigniew Brzezinski are all high level minions of this Jesuit General-led criminal cabal.
    Because they have owned and totally controlled the mainstream media for so long, most people still do not have a clue. Thank God for the internet!

    Of course, they are coming after the internet with their Cyber Czar.
    They hate for us to know just how diabolical they really are, and WHO they really are.
  • Reply By Ross1776 Ross1776 | 6 months ago
    If this was your "Jesuit" conspiracy, then Buchanan would be all for Ms. Sotomayor, as she has identified herself as a "Latina" and Catholic, from what information I have been able to find. He would not be taking the positions he has at all. So I really hate to burst your bubble but while there may be some truth to the NWO and globalization plan of those New World Order followings of the CFR and old European banking houses - don't think you could count Mr. Buchanan in as one of those followers - in fact he has been pushing for America to re-establish it's sovereignty, and protection of both American soil as with border security, and also American jobs as with taxing the outsourcing and insourcing, from everything I've read.

    In fact, actually can somewhat still read the Constitution, believe it or not, which Mr. Obama clearly cannot, and is no "Constitutional lawyer," that's for sure. And what university is more "liberal" and "government as sovereign" than Yale and Harvard? Sort of fascism in the law is what they teach, as in "case law" and "judge made law" rather than our Constitution, or the founder's intent behind that "contract."

  • Posted By Write4Life Write4Life | 6 months ago
    I am not relating this to Buchanan - but to generalizations being made that anyone who brings up opposition to Sotmayor is racist.

    I do not have an issue with her- but will the left wing when she is selected and then throws out a pro-life verdict?

    The Supreme court already had FIVE catholics on it - that's an issue - by people with no faith -or a different faith - are they biased?

    I am white - but I believe a justice should base decisions on LAW not personal beliefs - she does not always do that as demonstrated in her reviews - Does that make ME racist?

    An opposition view is not allowed by the left wing...a point that should be addressed more often and the LEFT controlss mainstream media... not the right.

    bwinright - I agree that the internet has made it easier to uncover the truth on people.
  • Reply By CaliforniaMike CaliforniaMike | 6 months ago
    That wasn't at all what I said. Buchanan's racism goes back much further and much deeper than just this case.
  • Posted By JarretteFellowsJr JarretteFellowsJr | 6 months ago
    In case you were wondering, you know you're not a red neck when you can't stand to hear what they say, write, and believe.
  • Posted By Write4Life Write4Life | 6 months ago
    CaliMike - I know - that's why I said - not relating to Buchanan... more about the comments in the media that opposition to Sotomayor MUST mean racism. Sorry about not making that clear...MA
  • Posted By JollyRoger JollyRoger | 6 months ago
    Being both a racist and a sexist, I tend to believe Buchanan is merely telling the (apparent) truth in suggesting that Sotomayer would probably lean away from white males in a decision. I am a white male. I don't feel threatened. I don't mind the advantage falling elsewhere for a change. (Its fallen in my favor for over two hundred years and the government sucks as much for me as anyone else. Knock youself out).

    PS - bwinright, you're a fruitcake. The Jesuits, for chrissake.
  • Posted By Ross1776 Ross1776 | 6 months ago
    Actually, I do believe in having read Mr. Buchanan's columns, that what he is referring to is affirmative action and that the white male is now in the position that black male used to be in. And it appears it is the liberal loony tunes that would make such parallels as you have in your commentary.

    And what is more racist than the groups actually that Ms. Sotomayor worked for or belong to, such as "La Raza" which actually means "the Race" and although of Puerto Rican heritage (not even a "foreign" Latin country such as Mexico), she has used the race card quite a bit in many of her comments, and also representations as a "Latina," although Puerto Rico has been a U.S. terroritory for quite some time, so technically really is not a "Latina" at all.

    Who's the loony tunes?
  • Reply By CaliforniaMike CaliforniaMike | 6 months ago
    Latina means woman of Latin descent. There are plenty of women born in Los Angeles who call themselves Latinas, just as there are plenty of people who have never been to Africa who call themselves African-American.

    La Raza is the moderate Latino group; look at MEChA for a more radical view.
  • Reported by Michael Rappaport
    Report Your News Got a similar story?
    Add it to the network!

    Or add related content to this report

    Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @3366217

    Most Popular Reports

    Related Allvoices Reports

    Related People

    Contributions

    Help and Accounts


    Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

    © Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.