The decision on whether to act on the Global Climate Change (GCC) is probably one of the easiest ones ever. GCC has been discussed for ages. Everyone have their view. Their opinions....
Are you willing to take the chance that what a predominant part of scientists are saying is true? It seems like a bit of a too high stake game for sure. If anything we would have made the earth a better place to live.
if GW is false, the damage is not just money; it is credibility of the whole environmental movement. GW has become the Eco-Iraq. If GW is true, and we do nothing, it is still unclear how bad it will be - a slight warming might be beneficial. Consequently, the undue haste to 'do something' may cost much more than GW itself. Better to let the scientists do science with the overlay of political urgency.
If you want to add your voice and contribute to this existing news event, use the event code
(Event Code: @335026), that you will find on each news event page, as the first word of the
SMS or MMS message followed by a space then add your contribution (text, image or video). For example:
@335026 This is an amazing video of Greg Norman hitting a hole-in-one in Sydney, Australia.
The first word of the message should be @335026 (event code), to make sure the system attaches
your voice to the right news event.
This beta report credibility rating is intended to help our community sort through uncensored citizen media reports. For more information, see the Report Credibility section in our FAQ