The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

Obama to Push Gay Agenda on the Military

By: Mfloyd send a private message
Washington : DC : USA | 10 months ago  
Views: 69
  • Gay Vote
    Gay Vote
    Posted by: Mfloyd
    Fitzsimmons
Gay Vote

As Barack Obama prepares to be sworn in as commander in chief on January 20, homosexual-rights activists are gleeful about changes he will bring to the armed services. Based on his campaign promises, Obama is expected to overturn the military's policy regarding sexual conduct. Commonly referred to as “don’t ask, don’t tell” the military prohibits the service of openly practicing homosexuals. This policy was created early in the Clinton administration after a long and divisive fight and the hard-fought compromise has drawn the ire of liberals such as Obama ever since.

“It's time to turn the page on the bitterness and bigotry that fill so much of today's LGBT (Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender) rights debate,” Obama said while campaigning. “The rights of all Americans should be protected -- whether it's at work or anyplace else. 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' needs to be repealed because patriotism and a sense of duty should be the key tests for military service, not sexual orientation."

Not reported in the media or discussed by advocates are the opinions of the men and women actually serving our country that would be affected by this change in policy. A poll of some 2,000 active duty military taken in December by the Military Times found that 58 percent opposed a policy change. Of those polled, 10 percent said they would not reenlist, and 14 percent reported they would consider not reenlisting if the policy is changed to please homosexual activists.

Essentially, the United States military, the greatest fighting force ever assembled, has had a policy in place against homosexual conduct since its formation. This policy annoys certain liberals who want to force their social agenda on the rest of the country and ignore those affected.

Bill Clinton tried in the 1990s to end the prohibition of homosexual activity in the armed forces, but his attempt to do so was heavily criticized by members of both parties. The opposition was led by Sam Nunn, a Democrat from Georgia. After much haranguing, a compromise was reached that stated “…the prohibition against homosexual conduct is a long-standing element of military law that continues to be necessary in the unique circumstances of military service.”

Barring a pre-enlistment question about homosexuality "was the only compromise Congress let Clinton get away with," says Elaine Donnelly, president of the non-profit Center for Military Readiness which supports continuing the ban. "The law respects the power of sexuality and the normal human desire for modesty in sexual matters." There have been on-and-off efforts to repeal this law over the last few years, but those are expected to intensify with Obama's support.

While Obama is clearly in favor of repealing this law, the question becomes, when will he push for it? Some pundits believe that Obama will act quickly because he is eager to appease the gay leaders after he upset many homosexuals by selecting Rick Warren, a staunch supporter of traditional marriage, to give the invocation at his inauguration. Obama also appears to be tapping Bill White, a gay man, to be his Navy secretary, which will certainly bring the policy regarding sexual conduct to the forefront.

As Obama weighs his options, a reason for him to pause is a Wall Street Journal survey. It found that the top issue motivating people to vote Republican, which returned control of Congress to the GOP in 1994, was Clinton’s attempt to lift the military ban on homosexuality. There is certainly no public mandate for this social change.

If Barack Obama stays true to his campaign promises, the armed forces will likely lose hundreds of thousands of troops. When our troop numbers are already stretched thin, we don’t need radical policies driving away more. Nevertheless, Obama appears poised to stubbornly buck centuries of military tradition by going against the will of the American people, as well as those in the military who will be affected by this change. If this happens, he is sure to have a full-blown enlistment crisis on his hands. At that point the only solution to the manpower crisis may be a return of the draft.

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon

Related Allvoices Contributions

News Stories
 
  • News Source: Baltimore Sun | 10 months ago
    The Senate has confirmed Hillary Clinton to become secretary of state. The Senate vote today was overwhelmingly in favor of the former first lady despite lingering concerns by some Republicans that her husband's charitable fundraising overseas could...
  • News Source: NewKerala | 10 months ago
    The crowd greeted the President-elect to the stage shouting: "Obama, Obama". Earlier, thousands of spectators crammed the street outside one of the security gates at the ceremony Thursday. Saddleback Church founder Rick Warren delivered the...
  • News Source: Rediff | 10 months ago
    The United States Senate has put off for a day the vote on President Barack Obama's [ Images ] choice Hillary Clinton [ Images ] as Secretary of State after strong opposition from a lawmaker who is seeking more transparency from the Clinton...
  • News Source: Androscoggin News | 10 months ago
    Nearly every presidential administration begins with a review of the current shape of government -- which agencies are doing what work, at what cost and to what end. The Obama administration is no exception, with the new president promising a top-to-...
  • News Source: Canadian Broadcasting Corporation | 10 months ago
    The objection of a single Republican senator thwarted the plans of Hillary Clinton to be confirmed as U.S. secretary of state on Tuesday...Senate swiftly endorsed six members of President Barack Obama's cabinet, but put off a vote on Clinton's...
  • News Source: Yedioth Ahronoth | 10 months ago
    The Democratic-led US Senate began confirming new President Barack Obama's Cabinet on Tuesday, but it put off until Wednesday a vote on the designee for secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton.   Obama's fellow Democrats had wanted Clinton also...
Blogs
 >
  • Blog Source: 2minuteview.blogspot.com
    Barring the pre-enlistment question about homosexuality "was the only compromise Congress let Clinton get away with," says Elaine Donnelly, president of the non-profit Center for Military Readiness which supports continuing the ban. ...
  • Blog Source: www.democrats.org
    Within days of becoming president, Bill Clinton sought to eliminate the long-standing prohibition against homosexuals enlisting into military service. His proposal met such stark opposition from within the ranks of the military that he ...
  • Blog Source: james4america.wordpress.com
    I believe this will negatively affect reenlistment, especially if there is an “openly gay” soldier in their unit. I’m not sure how to express some of my concerns. I am of the opinion that a gay lifestyle is a “choice”, and people are ...
  • Blog Source: hottopics.gay.com
    In addition almost a quarter of the respondents said that a repeal of the policy would have a negative impact on their willingness to re-enlist or extend their service, or continue a military career after their current time was up. ...
  • Blog Source: urbangrounds.com
    An Army Times poll reports that up to 10% of the current military force would not re-enlist if homosexuals are allowed to serve openly. I somehow doubt that 10% would be offset by an increase in the number of recruits who would fill ...
  • Blog Source: guarino.typepad.com
    It is difficult to see how this long-discussed policy change will robustly enhance morale among the troops, or lead to dramatic improvements in enlistment/reenlistment figures among the folks willing to put their lives on the line. ...
Images
 >
 
Posted By Suffolk1 Suffolk1 | 10 months ago
It's not about the gay agenda. It's about the freedom to be open about who we all are as people. Who are we to oppress others because of who they are? Hiding behind this anarchic "don't ask, don't tell" only perpetuates this second-class identity for gays, which is terrible. Be brave enough to accept the human race is made up of different people... Fear cripples. Honesty liberates. Just strikes me as absurdly ignorant and a little bit pathetic to consider gays in the army are a threat to our social fabric...
Reported by Mfloyd
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @2285351

Most Popular Reports

Related Allvoices Reports

Related People

Contributions

Help and Accounts


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.