Why Obama signed the sequestration order
Linkedin

Why Obama signed the sequestration order

Washington : DC : USA | Mar 03, 2013 at 6:11 AM PST
XX XX
Views: Pending
 

As is being widely reported, President Barack Obama signed an order Friday night authorizing the reduction of $85 billion from federal accounts. Friday was the self-imposed deadline (by Congress and the president) to avoid these admittedly steep, one-year cuts. For his part, the president continues to argue to anyone who will listen that he opposes such cuts.

Here is the text of the statement he made after signing the order.

Yes, Obama has offered replacing the cuts, known as a “sequester” in government budget language, with tax increases and cuts spread out over time. Republicans, of course, rejected as a non-starter any plan or program that included even the hint of tax increases.

As reported by The Chicago Sun-Times, the government says the cuts result in almost immediate furloughs to some 700,000 to 750,000 federal government employees. Both current defense contracts and domestic government programs will also be affected. Supposedly, active military personnel and specified anti-poverty and low-income assistance programs will not be touched.

But already, only one day into the “sequester,” the hurt is being felt. In Seattle, for example, the King County Housing Authority announced that it has ceased issuing housing vouchers under a federal program that benefits “elderly or disabled households, veterans, and families with children.”

Meanwhile, in Washington, D.C., fingerpointing and the blame game consume most of president’s and Congress’ time.

Opinion:

Am I missing something here? I have read, heard and watched reports that either congress or the president could have stopped this “sequester” with, in Congress’ case, the stroke of a pen. Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) introduced a one-sentence bill sometime ago to simply “repeal” the sequester. The president, of course, could have even more easily just kept his pen in his pocket and not signed the sequester order. What gives?

The Republicans and the Tea Party, enamored of Grover Norquist’s goal, promise and pledge to shrink government to a size suitable for “drowning in the bathtub,” have finally got what they’ve always wanted, dreamed of -- an across-the-board, no-questions-asked bludgeoning of the federal budget.

The Democrats, led by an admitted “moderate Republican” and “first black president,” have also achieved their goal. Slashing of the budget at the expense of those who can least afford any cuts whatever, while protecting their biggest campaign benefactors. (For more on Obama's view of himself and his role as "Republican-light," see, http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/13638564-obama-calls-himself-a-moderate-republican).

You will notice, I hope, that the two parties are not at all at odds with each other on this. That is why Conyers’ bill went nowhere and why the president had no trouble signing the sequestration order.

Sure, both parties claim to hate the very idea of “sequestration.” But that claim is not merely disingenuous; it is false on its face. What they hate is not sequestration, but being blamed for it. Thus, as each new cut in vital services kicks in over the next year, we, the public, will be treated to new and improved versions of the blame game.

But the cuts will continue. My 93-year-old aunt’s “Meals on Wheels” wagon will stop rolling. More working poor people will become homeless. More students will not be able to pay tuition.

But the corporate jetsetters will still be flying high.

Thank you, Mr. President.

If you like to write about US politics, enter Allvoices’ "The American Pundit" political writing contest. Allvoices is awarding four $250 prizes each month between now and Nov. 30. These monthly winners earn eligibility for the $5,000 grand prize, to be awarded in December. If you do not already have a free account, sign up here.

The American Pundit on Twitter: https://twitter.com/AmericanPundits

Allvoices on Twitter: https://twitter.com/allvoices

Allvoices on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/freelance.journalism

References:

http://www.suntimes.com/news/18559007-418/obama-signs-order-for-85-billion-in-across-the-board-budget-cuts.html?intcmp=emailheadlines

http://www.rte.ie/news/2013/0302/371680-obama-signs-sequester-order-after-talks-fail/

http://www.cnbc.com/id/100514019

http://www.wcvb.com/news/politics/Deep-spending-cuts-take-effect/-/9848766/19139492/-/qbx4yr/-/index.html

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/mar/1/no-movement-obama-hill-leaders-meet-sequester-cuts/

http://www.talkleft.com/story/2013/3/1/214821/4982

Herbert Dyer, Jr. is based in Chicago, Illinois, United States of America, and is an Anchor on Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
 
Advertisement
 

News Stories

 
  • Obat Tradisional Miom

    Submitted By: herbal47 | over 1 year ago
      » Selamat datang di pusat informasi produk Jelly Gamat Gold-G. Web resmi dari agen pusat untuk melayani pemesanan dari seluruh Indonesia dengan layanan  “Barang sampai, baru bayar!!”  , yaitu sistem pengiriman barang lebih dulu dengan transfer ...
  • Obama's second-term agenda threatened by looming fiscal issues

      The Globe & Mail
    House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi listens to a question during a news conference at the U.S...Video The economic effects of the spending cuts may take time to kick in, but political blowback has already begun and is hitting Obama as well as...
  • The Issue: Washington has elevated fingerpointing to an Olympic sport in ...

      United Press International
    UPI/Kevin Dietsch  License photo If fingerpointing were an Olympic sport, Washington would win the gold hands down. As the clocked ticked down on the sequester -- $85 billion in budget cuts that will run through the end of the fiscal year --...
  • Lobbyists' fight against sequester cuts moving into a new phase

      The Hill
    With lawmakers unable to reach a last-minute deal to avert $85 billion in budget cuts, President Obama has ordered agencies to implement the sequester. That means a 9 percent cut across the board for non-defense spending and 13 percent for defense...
  • The sequester and the Tea Party plot

      SF Bay View
    Popular Tags Archives Feeds by Robert Reich Imagine a plot to undermine the government of the United States, to destroy much of its capacity to do the public's business and to sow distrust among the population. Around the country, people are...
  • Sequester Cuts 2013: What's Happened So Far

      International Business Times
    Reuters Since Friday at midnight, Americans have officially been living in Sequesterville. Since Friday at midnight, Americans have officially been living in Sequesterville...President Barack Obama and the Congress have blamed each other for...

Blogs

 >

More From Allvoices

Related People

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Most Commented Reports



Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc. 2008-2014. All rights reserved. Powered by PulsePoint.