According to the latest reports out of Washington, last-minute negotiations between Republicans and Democrats have led to a tentative agreement to raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans, but here's the catch: The House has adjourned and will not vote on the measure until sometime next week.
This means that a deal will not be reached in time to avoid the combined spending cuts and tax increases commonly referred to as "the fiscal cliff."
However, the New York Times is reporting that if Congress acts quickly in 2013, the economic impact will be limited.
President Obama expressed optimism earlier in the day that a deal could be reached. "Today, it appears that an agreement to prevent this New Year's tax hike is within sight," NBC News quoted Obama as saying. "But it's not done."
With compromises apparently reached on letting the Bush tax cuts expire on individual incomes above $400,000 and household incomes of $450,000, as well as a tentative agreement on estate tax details, the main remaining point of contention has to do with "sequestration," automatic spending cuts to numerous programs that would kick in if a deal is not reached.
Earlier, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada told reporters Monday that he sees progress in negotiations between congressional Democrats and Republicans in down-to-the-wire attempts to reach a budget agreement before midnight.
When asked by reporters Monday morning if he thought a deal could be reached, Reid said: “I really hope so. We’re not there yet, though.”
Social Security
According to various reports over the weekend, the Republicans agreed to take cuts to Social Security off the table, and President Barack Obama has agreed to an increase in the level where Bush-era tax cuts would expire, from the $250,000 the administration originally proposed to somewhere between $400,000 and $500,000.
As of 8:45 p.m. EST on New Year's Eve, no further information on the fate of Social Security under the tentative deal has been released.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, told reporters that he and Vice President Joe Biden had been in contact around 12:45 a.m. and again at 6:30 a.m. on New Year’s Eve.
Speaking on the Senate floor Sunday, McConnell said: “The sticking point appears to be a willingness or interest or frankly, the courage to close the deal. I’m willing to get this done, but I need a dance partner.”
If no deal is reached by midnight tonight, the Bush-era tax cuts enacted more than a decade ago will expire, leading the US over the so-called fiscal cliff. If that happens, all taxpayers, not just those making less than a few hundred thousand dollars annually, will see their taxes increase in 2013.
Commentary:
Oh, the drama. I thought the president’s nickname was “No Drama Obama,” but I guess congressional Republicans have other ideas.
We may or may not see a budget deal before midnight, but why did we have to see such theatrical shenanigans leading up to this point? Whatever happened to getting the job done without all the oh-so-public back-and-forth?
Some might say that’s the way Washington works, and to a large degree, they’re right. But with the vast majority of Americans siding with Obama on the income tax aspect of the deal, and Americans of all ages still voicing their support for Social Security and Medicare, it seems like legislators who are truly striving to represent the people would take that into consideration from the beginning.
Maybe they did. Maybe they only put Social Security “on the table” so they could take it off later, ever so subtly softening Americans’ resistance to the idea of Social Security cuts in the process. But Obama was not re-elected to weaken Social Security, and few if any representatives or senators were elected to force his hand on these popular programs.
If anything, the No. 1 question going into the budget negotiations should have been “What do we have to do to preserve Social Security?” Maybe the answer lies in gradually raising the cap for Social Security taxes from $110,000 in annual income to a higher figure that would allow the program to remain strong and effective for many decades to come. After all, more Americans of all parties support that approach than simply taking the budget ax to programs so critical to our most vulnerable citizens.
Sources & Resources:
GOP senators: Social Security off table, Washington Post, Dec. 30, 2012
Reid Hopeful Negotiators to Reach Last-Minute Budget Deal, Bloomberg Businessweek, Dec, 31, 2012
Millennials Favor Preserving Social Security Over Reducing Deficit, Despite Skepticism: Pew Poll, Huffington Post, Dec. 31, 2012
Additional sources and resources linked to in text.
Or add related content to this report
News Stories | Blogs | Images | Videos | Comments
Remember the main sticking points all revolve around giving tax breaks to millionaires. They already do not pay into SS and Medicare above $106k a year. Repubs are also fighting to keep taxes low on $5 million estates. Last time I looked, most people don't have multimillion dollar estates.
The GOP is about keeping the rich govt-dependent - to defend their money.
When I first read about chaining SS to the CPI instead of cost living raises, the thought did cross my mind that this was a political move to incite public outcry, thus, forcing the GOP to accept raising taxes on the rich. It worked on me! I wrote about the inherent problems with chained CPI, and I don't think the American people would ever accept it if they are aware of the dangers.
Here is my report on why chained CPI is wrong.
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/13636530-chained-cpi-adjustment-is-punitive-for-seniors-living-on-social-security
........................
You want to cut the debt? How about starting with the U. S. Military Budget. At $800,000,000,000. we can certainly afford to stop bombing and then rebuilding countries whose population condem our efforts. Congress and the president have forgetten what country they live in. How about bringing our military home and retraining them to help the rest of us, here at home, first.
......... Since the previous state legislature underfunded the teacher's pension fund, we'll all be staring at a 30% increase in our School Property Tax, in the next couple of years.
Our mainstream media keeps most of us from ever knowing what's going to hit working families and retirees the hardest until it's too late for us to put a stop to this abuse.
... Even though opponents, spearheaded by the phoney-baloney IFO, claim the Pennsylvania Taxpayers Independence Act underfunds schools by a few billion dollars, would you rather pay a few thousand more in school property tax, next year and/or in 2014, or pay a few hundred more in income tax and 1% more in sales tax? That IS The Question facing you in 2013. ... A few hundred verses a few thousand. .
.. The Pennsylvania Taxpayers Independence Act allows your income tax to go up from 3.1% to 4% or 5% to assist the 1% raise in sales tax to fund every single public and charter school in Pennsylvania -- instead of the current system that authorizes your school board and county tax office to collect as much money as they see if from every property owner in Pennsylvania -- AND IF you do not pay the property taxes, they have the power to foreclose on you and throw you out of your home. ... This goes for military service people, farmers, teachers, newspaper employees, plumbers, etc. - Even renters are at risk when the landlord doesn't pay the taxes. .... So, P-L-E-A-S-E consider joining us here, at the PTCC http://www.facebook.com/groups/pataxpayers and pass the word to everyone you know, via your contact and friends lists, even folks in other states because, the property taxes are deteriorating their quality of life as well!