Iran claims deployment of Patriot missiles will harm Turkey's security

Iran claims deployment of Patriot missiles will harm Turkey's security

Tehrān : Iran | Dec 23, 2012 at 5:49 AM PST
Views: Pending
A Kuwaiti reporter gets a close up look at a Patriot missile launcher in 2003

Ever since NATO’s decision to deploy Patriot missiles to the Turkish-Syrian border, Iran has been claiming that the missiles are not there to protect Turkey from the Syrian threat but rather to turn Iran into an easy target. Almost everyday, Iran has been warning of the danger of these missiles, claiming they are a threat to the entire Middle East.

On Saturday, the Iranian Students News Agency (ISNA) quoted Iran’s defense minister, Brig. Gen. Ahmad Vahidi, as saying that the installation of the Patriot air defense missiles, which NATO claims is to defend Turkish territory from neighboring Syria, will only harm Turkey’s security.

The minister did not clarify what he actually meant, but he stressed that Western countries have always sought to guarantee their own interests. He added: “We are against the presence of Western countries in regional interactions.”

At the same time, Vahidi denied that his own country is providing troops and arms to help Syrian President Bashar al-Assad defeat the armed opposition forces.

“Syria has no need for the training of its forces by the Revolutionary Guard of Iran, because Syria has a powerful military that has prepared itself for involvement with the Zionist regime,” Vahidi said.

The international community has accused Iran, which has supported the Assad regime since the beginning of the crisis in March 2011, of supplying weapons and expertise to the Syrian army.

Last September, Iran’s Al Alam TV reported that the commander of the Revolutionary Guard, Gen. Mohammad Ali Jafari, acknowledged for the first time since the popular revolution against the Syrian regime began that members of the elite Al-Quds force were in Syria and Lebanon to provide non-military assistance and were willing to intervene on the ground if Syria was attacked.

Later, the spokesman for Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ramin Mehmanparast, stressed that there is no Iranian military presence in the region, especially not in Syria.

Meanwhile, NATO said in a statement that the deployment of Patriot ground-to-air missile batteries in Turkey was a defensive step only and that it would not support a no-fly zone or any offensive operation.

All six Patriot batteries provided by the US, Germany and Netherlands will be under NATO command and control and are scheduled to be operational near the Turkish-Syria border by the end of January 2013, according to NATO’s statement.


As I previously mentioned, Iran feels that the Patriot missiles were also deployed as a measure against Iranian missiles. For this, the Iranian reaction varies from condemnation and warning. Besides, Iran announced that it would stage naval war games in the Strait of Hormuz in order to test new military systems and practice new military tactics.

I neither deny nor confirm that Iran’s fears are true. The Syrian army cannot, at this time, fight the armed opposition, so how can we expect the regime to carry out a war on Turkey in retaliation to its support for the Free Syrian Army?

Of course, America and Turkey know the Syrian threat will not exceed firing tank shells or mortar, which could, by mistake, fall into Turkish territories.

What is happening on the Turkish-Syrian border is the same scenario that is happening on the Israeli-Syrian border, so the question is: why not deploy Patriot missiles over there?

I think this matter is very clear for the Iranians, therefore I tend to believe that the monument of missiles is meant to target Iran. Hitting Iran would be in Israel’s and Turkey’s interest, as Turkey is worried from the opposition strikes and arming provided by the Iranian regime.

As for Iran’s defense minister, who denies supporting the Syrian regime, please note that anyone who goes to Damascus might think himself in Tehran due to the large number of Iranians there, whether businessmen or army officers. This was popular before the revolution.

Nowadays, Iranian militants and Hezbollah elements are present along with the elements of the Iraqi Mahdi militia. This is all for ideological reasons because if the Alawite regime should fall, they understand that it would mean the fall of the other systems in the region too, or at least support will stop for the Shiites in the Middle East and pave the way for the Muslim Brotherhood.


1 of 4
Iran DM : deployment of Patriot missiles will harm Turkey security
saleh1966 is based in Gaza, Ġazzah, Palestine, and is an Anchor on Allvoices.
Report Credibility
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear

News Stories

  • NATO missile plan bad for Turkey: Iran

      Zee News
    Patriot missiles along the Turkish border with Syria would be detrimental to Turkey. "The deployment of Patriot missiles in Turkey will play no role in Turkey's security and will be harmful to Turkey," Iranian Defence Minister Brigadier General Ahmad...
  • When it comes to Syria, Russia sends missiles, mixed signals

      Fox News
    Israel   Russia continues to send mixed signals over its stance in support of the Syrian regime, with President Vladimir Putin hinting that President Bashar al-Assad's downfall is likely even as unconfirmed reports indicate Russia is shipping high-...
  • Extremists and conquerors of Syria's war?

      Jerusalem Post
    After 11 months of conflict and despite recent progress made by the rebels, most parts of Syria are still under Assad's rule. Abdalghne Karoof After 11 months of conflict and despite recent progress made by the rebels, most parts of Syria are still...
  • Air strike kills dozens of Syrians in bread line

      Jerusalem Post
    The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a British-based group with a network of activists across Syria, said that 60 people were killed. The number is likely to rise because there are dozens of wounded being treated in the area and nearby hospitals,...
  • Syria's war-battered pound floats on rebel funds

      The Daily Star
    200, 100, 50 Syrian pounds) are seen on display at the central bank in Damascus July 27, 2010. In Syria's eastern town of Deir al-Zor, a rebel commander flush with cash was swapping his dollars for Syrian pounds to pay fighters battling President...
  • Israel says Syria chemical weapons are secure for now

      The Daily Star
    A boy walks past shops, damaged by what activists said were missiles fired by a Syrian Air Force fighter jet of forces loyal to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, at Douma near Damascus December 17, 2012. Syria's chemical weapons are still secure...



More From Allvoices

Related People

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Most Commented Reports

Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc. 2008-2014. All rights reserved. Powered by PulsePoint.