Committee chairs have been decided in the US House of Representatives, and there are no women among them. The only open slots, including panels in Washington, are the House Ethics Committee and House Administration Committee which are still to be named, according to Politico.
The meetings to decide who will chair committees is closed to the public, so the all-male decision makers cannot be scrutinized for their decision making process or their reasoning for not having any women in any of these key positions.
According to the 2010 census, the US population is 50.8 percent female, and one would think the “people’s house” in Washington would make some attempt to be representative of women in leadership roles.
Michigan Representative Candice Miller was the top female considered to lead a major committee, but she lost out to Texas Rep. Mike McCaul for the chairmanship of the Homeland Security Committee.
Republican women did make gains with the help of Republican leadership. Washington Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers will be House Republican Conference chairwoman, Kansas Rep. Lynn Jenkins will be her vice chair. No Democratic women were among the considerations, which is glaring because there are Democratic women who will be ranking members on committees. House Democrats should have five women as ranking members committees as follows: Rep. Nita Lowey (N.Y.) or Rep. Marcy Kaptur (Ohio) on Appropriations, Rep. Maxine Waters (Calif.) on Financial Services, Rep. Louise Slaughter (N.Y.) on Rules, Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson (Texas) on Science and Rep. Nydia Velazquez (N.Y.) on Small Business.
There were places in the House for women to be considered as new chairmanships, but they were all awarded to men: New chairmen include Reps. Jeb Hensarling of Texas atop Financial Services, Ed Royce of California on Foreign Affairs, Bob Goodlatte of Virginia on Judiciary, Lamar Smith of Texas on the Science, Space and Technology Committee and Bill Shuster of Pennsylvania atop Transportation and Infrastructure.
Republicans are not the only ones who can “change” the rules
Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin) will be keeping his chairmanship of the Budget Committee thanks to the GOP bypassing its own rules and giving a waiver to Ryan, so he can keep his post for a fourth term. The Democrats need to remind the Republicans they are not the only ones who can change the rules.
Yesterday, the Senate asked a federal judge to dismiss a citizen lobbying group’s lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Senate rules setting a 60-vote threshold for defeating filibusters. Harry Reid the Senate Majority Leader wants the ability to bring a bill before the Senate with the approval of a simple majority of its 100 members. A minority of 41 opponents could still resort to a filibuster to prevent the Senate from voting on the bill itself, but only by talking continuously about it on the Senate floor, according to a Washington Post report.
The states’ constituency of the women elected to the US House need to make their voices heard in Washington. There are ranking women both Democrat and Republican, and they deserve to have leadership positions to, at the very least, represent the demographics of the United States for equal and fair representation.
Resources
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/111
Or add related content to this report
News Stories | Blogs | Images | Videos | Comments
It's clear that these guys simply do not believe in a real democracy; that they are ignoring the results of last month's election; that they will continue with their right wing agenda until they are all defeated. Can you imagine what would be happening now had Romney actually won?
Rated up/shared.
I cringe to think what would have happened if Romney would have gotten elected. The American people knew whom they could trust, and it was not the Republican party.
The GOP is going to pay at the polls in 2014.
P.S. Rep. Candice Miller (R-MI) is on the House Administration Committee. I guess Republican or Conservative women do not count.
This article was about awarding chairmanships to women in the House, not whether they are on a committees. (If you would have read the column.)
BeanerECMO- they have to piss and moan about the fact that Mrs. Miller is the chairwoman of a SUBcommittee. This is all an non-issue.
Best PERSON for the job is the ONLY way humans will move ahead. That means height, age, skin colour, eye colour, hair colour, gender, marriage status, sex drive, and countless other frivolous things do not matter. The only thing that matters is that you are the best PERSON for the job.
It just so happens that men were the best PERSON for these positions. Stop your crying. Stop trying to make this a gender issue. Stop using situations like this to further a political agenda. The world is sick of hearing about it.