Republicans abandon Norquist pledge after 2012 election losses
Linkedin

Republicans abandon Norquist pledge after 2012 election losses

Tampa : FL : USA | Nov 26, 2012 at 9:59 AM PST
XX XX
Views: Pending
 
Grover Norquist

President Obama won a second term and Republicans got beat up. That is pretty much what the 2012 election results said. Voters also sent a message to Grover Norquist: His pledge to never raise taxes is antiquated drivel.

For more than 26 years, the Norquist pledge has held the US economy hostage. With no ability to raise revenue, the federal deficit has risen. And the person strangling it, a conservative lobbyist, has never even run for national office.

How did Norquist manage to take so much power? Money.

Norquist has been funding GOP campaigns for decades through his advocacy group, Americans for Tax Reform. In exchange for his support, candidates sign the Norquist pledge, which forbids them from bringing a dime of extra revenue into federal coffers. Of course the greatest beneficiary of this pledge is Norquist himself, along with other millionaires and billionaires.

What went wrong for Norquist was overreach in his protect-the-rich scheme. The deep recession that followed the Wall Street mortgage-greed debacle caused the entire US financial system to go into a meltdown. The working-class Americans on the losing end of the bailout deal got tired of being suckers for CEOs, so they voted mostly for Democrats in 2012.

Not surprisingly, the name “Grover Norquist” did not appear on any ballot. However, if Norquist had run on his own pledge to protect tax breaks for millionaires, he would surely have lost.

Americans are catching on. Tax breaks for millionaires really don’t create jobs.

Norquist has used the threat of backing primary challengers to lawmakers who dare to break their vow to his pledge. But that didn’t work in the 2012 elections. In Indiana, Richard Mourdock beat long-time GOP senator Richard Lugar in a primary challenge, only to go on to lose badly to Democrat Joe Donnelly. A similar scenario played out in Missouri with Todd (“legitimate rape”) Akin, and Sen. Claire McCaskill, a Democrat, went on to win re-election handily.

With his weapon to challenge disobedient incumbents losing its power, Norquist is fast becoming irrelevant.

In defense of his fading control over the Republican Congress, Norquist hit the Sunday talk show circuit. “No Republican has voted for a tax increase,” Norquist said on CNN’s “Starting Point.” “We’ve got some people discussing impure thoughts on national television.”

The “impure thoughts” Norquist referred to are coming from Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and others, who see the wrath of voters in 2014 coming their way if they push the country off the “fiscal cliff” because Norquist wants them to protect tax breaks for millionaires.

According to Politico, Norquist said, “They all said that two years ago when we were arguing over the debt ceiling limit … and during the debt ceiling, we cut spending, we didn’t raise taxes. So other Republicans didn’t listen to Peter King or these others.”

Norquist is putting up a courageous fight, but on some level he must know that the era of the party of “no” to any and all revenue increases must come to an end. The reality is, people making $8 an hour simply can’t payoff $14 trillion in debt all by themselves.

Recommended:

Tax breaks for the rich make the economy worse

Minnesota voters defeat voter ID law on ballot

Christmas shopping with credit cards is not a holiday bargain

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker announces new voter suppression plan

Back
1 of 16
Next
Grover Norquist
Image: Wiki Commons
itobin53 is based in Tampa, Florida, United States of America, and is an Anchor for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Posted By PrairieDogPress PrairieDogPress | 7 months ago
Hopefully, sweeping changes in Obama's second term will include sweeping self-serving people like Norquist right out the door.
Posted By jinkinpark jinkinpark | 7 months ago
A great and well written report. Rated up.
Posted By Wordsmith76 Wordsmith76 | 7 months ago
The criminals who attempted to murder our democracy must be brought to justice. How can we wage war in foreign countries to bring freedom and democracy to these oppressed peoples when we allow tyrants to rule here at home? Great article. Rated up.
Reply By robertweller Robert Weller | 7 months ago
Good point. It is not just Obama dealing with the rich, right-wing GOP. It also is Obama dealing with himself. Releasing Bradley Manning, closing Gitmo, legalizing marijuana, bringing the troops home, stopping the Hollywood-Pentagon spying on the Internet connection.
Posted By robertweller Robert Weller | 7 months ago
I have hated this guy ever since he posed for Grant Wood's American Gothic.
Posted By FloridaFan FloridaFan | 7 months ago
Generalities are so sweet. In fact, however, the signatories to Norquist's pledge were mostly legislators. They did pretty well in 2012. Although Obama trumpets that his win was a mandate for tax increases, 50% to 49% is not a landslide or a mandate And wait until the tax increases hit. Will it still be racist to criticize the Lord and Savior? Or will it become religious bigotry?

By the way, Norquist's pledge never had the force of law. It's nice to see it replaced by the pledge to protect and obey the Constitution. Do you suppose we could the Dems to sign that one?
Reply By canucanoe2 canucanoe2 | 7 months ago
The legislators that did well in 2012 did so because of gerrymandering, NOT because of their popularity. Try again.
Reply By FloridaFan FloridaFan | 7 months ago
Last I looked, you didn't get elected by Gerry or Mandy. It took the majority of votes in your district. Nice try. 50 cents for another spin.
Reply By canucanoe2 canucanoe2 | 7 months ago
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/harold-meyerson-gops-gerrymandered-advantages/2012/11/13/4785e4d6-2d2f-11e2-a99d-5c4203af7b7a_story.html

Being a bit disingenuous, aren't we? Both parties do it, but if you look at the new district boundary lines and say they weren't drawn to benefit the republicans in the last election then you are either woefully ignorant or you are an outright liar.
Reply By FloridaFan FloridaFan | 7 months ago
No, Canoe. Every party redistricts. It is usually a result of population shifts. People move from district to district, requiring district boundary changes for proportionality. On election day, however, winners have to get a plurality of the vote.
Reply By canucanoe2 canucanoe2 | 7 months ago
Are you trying to say that the Reps DIDN'T redistrict?
Posted By Kashifpk Kashifpk | 7 months ago
Great Artical. Informative. Thanks for sharing your nice views. Rated up.
Posted By Connorcat Connorcat | 7 months ago
Poor Doover Whoretwist. He won't be twisting anyone or anything anymore.
Posted By atifji75 atifji75 | 7 months ago
Well compiled and Nice presentation. Thanks for sharing. Rated Up !
Posted By FloridaFan FloridaFan | 7 months ago
I read Meyerson's piece. I noted that he said Democrats did it too. But was okay because the district results reflected the state's and the nation's proportionality.

Here's something you and Meyerson should think about: Why not just do away with districts and have the state's voted divvied up proportionally?

Because the system was set up so that the states could vote to reflect their interest and the House was set up so that states would not dominate every elective body. I suggest you get your head out of the Washington Post and into some history books, where the rest of woefully ignorant, outright liars hang out. Your next spin is free.
Advertisement
 

News Stories

 
  • Republican signatories to Norquist pledge indicate they would break it to ...

    Boston.com
    Grover Norquist It didn't come from negotiation principals like President Obama or House Speaker John Boehner, but rather rank-and-file members of Congress. Members of both the House and Senate said simply that the Emperor has no clothes on. And that...
  • Top Republicans Everywhere Are Breaking With Grover Norquist And Calling ...

    BusinessInsider
    Add Republicans Lindsey Graham, John McCain and Peter King to the list of top party members in Congress who are increasingly breaking with conservative Grover Norquist's " Taxpayer Protection Pledge." All three said on Sunday talk shows that they are...
  • Graham willing to break tax pledge

    Charlotte Observer Online
    Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said Sunday he was willing to violate Grover Norquist's Taxpayer Protection Pledge to strike a deal with Democrats over the so-called fiscal cliff, while a second Republican, Rep. Peter King, N.Y., echoed the assessment...
  • More Republicans To Grover Norquist: What Tax Pledge?

    International Business Times
    Grover Norquist has single-handedly tied the hands of 95 percent of congressional Republicans on tax increases, but John Boehner says he's just "some random person." Corker told CBS This morning on Monday that he owes Norquist no obligation.
  • Leading Republicans Are Giving Up On Grover Norquist

    BusinessInsider
    Anti-tax evangelist Grover Norquist, one of Washington's most influential figures, is facing an apparent erosion of his power as leading Republicans begin opting out of pledges to his cause. Norquist has amassed considerable clout over the last...
  • Sen. Graham ready to 'violate' anti-tax pledge for ‘fiscal cliff' deal

    The Hill
    But Graham cautioned that he he would violate the pledge "only if Democrats will do entitlement reforms" and ruled our increasing tax rates. "I am willing to generate revenue," he said. "I will not raise tax rates to do it; I will cap deductions."...

Images

 >
 

More From Allvoices

Related People

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_110_event
 


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2013. All rights reserved.